The Impact of Participation on Body Functions Among Youth With Physical Disabilities
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Youth with physical disabilities experience greater limitations to participation in community- based activities than do their average-developing peers, which can result in poor health outcomes. Emerging treatment approaches aimed at improving activity and participation have shifted from focusing only on impaired body functions towards the performance of functionally meaningful activities within the youth's natural environment. It is unclear; however, whether targeting intervention at the activity/participation level can simultaneously result in improvement of personal functional skills (e.g., reaching) and body functions (e.g., range of motion, balance) - components known to worsen with age and, thus, important to address and maintain within the rehabilitation process. Our team has partnered with key community-based stakeholders including youth, clinicians and policy-makers, and together we plan to examine whether engaging in an 8-week self-chosen community-based activity (e.g., sledge hockey, boccia) can lead to a significant improvement in three key body functions: motor, cognitive and affective. Thirty youth with physical disabilities will take part in the study and engage in an activity program of their choice. Changes in their body functions (e.g., movement, attention, mood) will be measured multiple times before, during and after engagement in the chosen activity/program. Findings of this study can guide clinicians, families and policy-makers to select effective approaches that not only promote participation but also facilitate additional motor and mental benefits from one single intervention. Such treatment approaches may also reduce the burden on the healthcare system as well as on the youth and families. Moreover, findings can advance our understanding of methods for testing complex and unique 'real-life' individual-based interventions that are highly relevant to practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2023
CompletedFebruary 22, 2023
February 1, 2023
1.7 years
February 26, 2020
February 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Behavioral Assessment System for Children
Evaluates cognitive and affective body functions using a 4-point scale. T-scores range from 0 to 120 in which lower scores indicate greater cognitive and affective body functions.
22 weeks
Trunk Impairment Scale
Assesses trunk control and includes 3 sub-scales; static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance and coordination. It contains 17 items rated on a 2-, 3- or 4- point scale. Total score measures motor body functions in terms of trunk control. Total score ranges from 0 (low performance) to 23 (high performance).
22 weeks
Functional Reach Test
Assesses motor body functions in terms of reaching. The maximum distance in inches the participant can reach forward while standing/sitting in a fixed position is measured; units: inches.
22 weeks
Jamar/Handheld micro Force Evaluation and Testing 2 (microFET2) Dynamometers
Measures motor body functions in terms of maximal grip, pinch strength and isometric muscle strength; units: pounds of force. Scores range from 0 to 200 pounds.
22 weeks
Goniometer
Measures active range of motion of specific joints relevant to the activity and based on the task analysis; units: degrees of range of motion.
22 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
10-point scale that measures activity performance. Score ranges from 1 (unable to perform) to 10 (performs extremely well).
22 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Life-Habits (LIFE-H)
This outcome will be assessed once at baseline only (week 1).
Study Arms (1)
Community-based activity program
EXPERIMENTALEngagement in 8-week community-based activity program
Interventions
Participants engage in a 8-week community-based activity program of their choice. In order to engage in the selected activity, an Occupational Therapist (OT) will meet with each youth in their home. Using the PREP 5 steps (Make goals; Map out a plan; Make it happen; Measure the process and outcomes; Move forward) the youth will choose a community program. The OT will then search for the appropriate program, identify and remove potential environmental barriers for participation in that activity (e.g., accessibility, equipment) and educate program instructors regarding the youth's specific needs. This process, which includes up to 12 hours of working with the OT, will set the stage for enrolment of the youth in a community program for a period of 8 weeks - the actual intervention phase. Other Names: • Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have a physical disability (e.g., cerebral palsy, spina bifida, musculoskeletal disorders)
- restricted mobility, such as an inability to navigate all surfaces and stairs independently and safely without the use of aids, physical assistance or external support
You may not qualify if:
- Youth who are recovering within the first year following a severe brain injury or an orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin treatment 6 months prior or anticipated during the study period or those with degenerative disorders will be excluded.
- Youth with significant intellectual delay will be excluded due to the demands required for completing self-reported assessments.
- Youth with co-occurrence of an untreated mental health condition will also be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McGill Universitylead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
- Drexel Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay Rehabilitation Center of CIUSSS West-Central Montreal (Mackay site)
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dana Anaby, PhD
McGill University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Assessors will be blinded to the time point in which the intervention begins and to the chosen activity
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2020
First Posted
February 28, 2020
Study Start
August 24, 2020
Primary Completion
May 24, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2023
Last Updated
February 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02