Comparative Efficacy of PRP and Dry Needling in Management of Trigger Points in Masseter Muscle in MPS Patients
Comparative Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection and Dry Needling in Management of Trigger Points in Masseter Muscle in Myofascial Pain Syndrome Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Title: Comparative Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma injection and Dry Needling in management of trigger points in masseter muscle in Myofascial Pain Syndrome patients. Rationale: Pain and trismus caused by Myofascial pain syndrome in masticatory muscles are one of the prime concerns for the patients. In the recent times, Platelet Rich Plasma therapy has been studied extensively and has produced promising results. It is used to promote sarcomere repair by concentrating growth factors and decrease inflammation by inhibiting pro-inflammatory and apoptotic cells. Thus, the present study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma injection in trigger points in masseter muscle in myofascial pain syndrome patients. Research Question P: Population (Patients with trigger points in masseter muscle) I: Intervention (PRP injection) C: Control (Dry needling) O: Outcome (Improvement in symptom of pain ) T: Time Frame (1 year) S: Study Design (Randomized clinical trial) Setting in Haryana , India Is Platelet Rich Plasma more effective as compared to dry needling alone in treatment of trigger points in masseter muscle in Myofascial Pain Syndrome patients ?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedFebruary 27, 2020
February 1, 2020
10 months
February 18, 2020
February 25, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
assessment of pain improvement upto 3 months
using Visual Analog Scale score; (0-10); 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain
3 months
Maximal Mouth Opening change from baseline to 3 months
measured by digital vernier callipers
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Range of Right and left Lateral excursion movements
3 months
Range of Protrusive movement
3 months
Need for pain medicine utilization
3 months
assessment of Patient satisfaction
3 months
assessment of Sleep pattern
3 months.
Study Arms (2)
TEST GROUP
EXPERIMENTALTest group will be administered 0.5 ml of PRP solution per trigger point in masseter muscle.
CONTROL GROUP
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn control group, dry needling will be performed.
Interventions
Clinically proven cases of Trigger points in masseter muscle will be randomly and equally divided into test group and control group. The selected subjects will be divided into two groups. Test group will be administered 0.5 ml of PRP solution per trigger point in masseter muscle according to symptoms of patient at baseline (0 week). PRP will be prepared as per methodology mentioned by Okuda et al 2003.
In control group all the armamentarium and procedure will remain same except that no PRP solution will be delivered. Only dry needling will be performed on the baseline.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The following patients will be included in the study:
- Patients diagnosed with myofascial pain within masseter muscle as per RDC/TMD (Ia and Ib)
- Patient's consent for participation in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with phobia to needles
- Patients who have undergone previous treatment for myofascial pain in past 3 months
- Patients with active infection at the site of injection
- Patients with history of head and neck fracture in the past 6 months.
- Patients with healing disorder or systemic disease where healing response is compromised
- Patients on anticoagulant medication
- Patients with bleeding and clotting disorder
- Patients with epilepsy/seizures
- Pregnancy/ Lactation
- Patients addicted to alcohol/ drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
PGIDS
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2020
First Posted
February 27, 2020
Study Start
February 24, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02