Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fracture
Analgesic Techniques Before Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Repair: Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a widely accepted anesthetic technique for hip fracture repair among elderly. Positioning for SA can be extremely painful. Effective management of pain is important for these patients comfort. Fascia Iliaca block (FIB) and Femoral nerve blocks are commonly used for analgesia in hip fracture patients. However, they often provide a modest reduction in pain. The Percapsular Nerve Group block (PENG Block) has the advantage that it covers the accessory obturator nerve. Aim of the study: compare FIB with PENG prior to positioning hip fracture patients for standardized SA. In a prospective randomized double blind we included 80 patients aged more than 65 years old, for whom pain was felt when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees. Patients were assigned to receive either ultrasound guided Fascia Iliaca block or Percapsular Nerve Group block using 20 mL Lidocaine 1.5% in both groups. We compared pain on positioning for spinal anesthesia using Verbal Rating Scale (VRS 0 = no pain , VRS 1 = mild pain, t 2= severe pain) for both groups. We also recorded different times to perfom block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2022
CompletedFebruary 13, 2024
February 1, 2024
1 month
February 9, 2020
February 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
positioning pain
Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]
up to 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Positioning Rating
up to 40 minutes
Imaging time
up to 10 minutes
Puncture time
up to 10 minutes
Performance time
up to 10 minutes
Number of punctures
up to 10 minutes
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
fascial iliaca
ACTIVE COMPARATOR: A linear high frequency ultrasound probe (10-15MHz) was placed in a transverse direction over the anterior thigh below the inguinal ligament. We identified the femoral artery and the iliacus muscle lateral to it, covered by the fascia iliaca. The needle was inserted in plane and a 22 gauge, 50 mm needle was advanced until the tips placed underneath the fascia iliaca. Following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic solution was injected in 5mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane for a total volume of 20 mL of 1.5% Lidocaine
Percapsular nerve group block
EXPERIMENTALA curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5MHz) was initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the iliopubic eminence (IPE), the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed. A 22-gauge, 100-mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic solution was injected in 5 mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane for a total volume of 20 mL of 1.5% Lidocaine.
Interventions
ultrasound guided block with 20 mL lidocaine 1.5%
ultrasound guided block with 20 mL lidocaine 1.5%
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients aged ≥ 65 years old and undergoing hip fracture surgical repair under continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA).
- Patients for whom pain was felt when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees (VERBAL PAIN SCALE =2)
You may not qualify if:
- \- ASA physical status ≥ 4.
- Impaired cognition or Dementia.
- Multiple fractures.
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia.
- Patient's disapproval.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Tunis El Manarlead
- Institut Kassab d'Orthopédiecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institut Kassab D'Orthopedie
Tunis, 2010, Tunisia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
khaireddine Raddaoui, MD
Tunis El Manar University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- all blocks were performed in a special area outside operating room by docters only implicated in performance assessement of block and not in patient care. Patients where after moved to operating room, care provider wil assess pain before spinal anesthesia
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2020
First Posted
February 26, 2020
Study Start
March 17, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
February 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02