Peri-capsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Arthroplasty
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigator will examine the efficacy of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block in hip surgeries as a post-operative pain management technique in comparison with fascia Iliaca block in hip surgeries
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2019
CompletedDecember 21, 2018
December 1, 2018
4 months
December 18, 2018
December 19, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
morphine consumption
total morphine consumption over 24 hours
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
pain scale Visual analogue Scale
24hours
muscle power
24 HOURS
Study Arms (2)
FIB
EXPERIMENTALhip fracture with fascia Iliaca block
PENG
EXPERIMENTALHip fracture with Pericapsular nerve group block
Interventions
The regional block was performed with the patient in the supine position. A curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5MHz) was initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees (Figs. 2, 3). In this view, the IPE, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed. A 22-gauge, 80-mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic solution (20ml of bupivacaine 0.25%) was injected in 5-mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane for a total volume of 30 mL
In supine position, a high frequency linear probe will be placed in the inguinal crease. Scan starting laterally from the femoral artery and nerve in inguinal crease to identify the sartorius muscle, tracing the muscle until it's origin to anterior superior iliac spine. The shadow of the bony of iliac crest \& iliacus muscle will be seen, the end point of the injection is deep to the fascia iliaca and above the iliacus muscle in the lateral part of the iliacus muscle. After negative aspiration, 30 mL of 0.25 % of bupivacaine will be injected under the fascial plane incrementally, aspirating every 5 ml.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for hip replacement surgeries e.g. hip hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty under subarachnoid block (SAB)
You may not qualify if:
- Coagulopathy
- infection at the injection site
- allergy to local anesthetics
- severe cardiopulmonary disease (≥ASA IV)
- diabetic or other neuropathies
- patients receiving opioids for chronic analgesic therapy
- contraindication to spinal anesthesia
- inability to comprehend visual analog scale (VAS).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, Giza Governorate, 1234, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- To achieve double blinding, patients will receive the block by the anesthetist. Another doctor not involved in the block procedure will evaluate the patients postoperatively.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2018
First Posted
December 21, 2018
Study Start
February 15, 2019
Primary Completion
May 31, 2019
Study Completion
June 20, 2019
Last Updated
December 21, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12