A Study Protocol Comparing a Home Rehabilitation Program Versus e-Health Program in Low Back Pain
A Study Protocol Randomised Feasibility Trial Comparing a Home Rehabilitation Program Versus e-Health Program on Disability, Pain, Fear of Movement, Quality of Life and Spinal Mobility in Non-specific Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of providing an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the McKenzie Method for patients with chronic low back pain in primary care, compared with the same home rehabilitation program but without the support of an electronic program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2021
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2023
8 months
February 10, 2020
September 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline the acceptability and demand of the e-Health intervention for patients and physiotherapists in comparison with the home rehabilitation program for the optimization of their design, development and delivery
The extent to which participants who have received the intervention through a web application consider that the content and support materials (web application and initial learning sessions) are appropriate and satisfactory to obtain the expected results.The extent to which the physiotherapists who have administered the intervention consider that the training, content and support materials are appropriate.Brief questionnaire developed for this trial\* 10-items Patients rate their acceptability and demand of treatment received and trial participation, including the burden of outcome measure completion. Measured with 10-point numeric rating scales ranging from not at all satisfactory to extremely satisfactory
At baseline, immediate post-treatment and 6 months
Change from baseline the feasibility of the trial procedures
The extent to which participants believe that their eligibility, outcome measures, follow-up and intervention by the physiotherapist have been satisfactory. The extent to which physiotherapists who have participated in the trial consider recruitment, outcome measures, evaluation follow-ups and appropriate and satisfactory intervention procedures.Brief questionnaire developed for this trial\* 4-items Measured with 10-point numeric rating scales ranging from not at all helpful to extremely helpful
At baseline, immediate post-treatment and 6 months
Change from baseline adaptation of the e-Health intervention and the trial procedures for to randomized clinical trial definitive
The extent to which the content of the e-health intervention, support materials and learning classes should be modified to improve their acceptability and implementation for a future definitive trial The extent to which recruitment, follow-up procedures and the number and outcome measures should be modified during / at the end of the trial to improve its acceptability and implementation for a definitive future trial.Brief questionnaire developed for this trial\* 11-items Measured using yes/no responses
At baseline, immediate post-treatment and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex.
At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in pain intensity. Visual analogue scale.
At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia.
At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
Change from baseline on Quality of Life. SF-36 Health questionnaire.
At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Home rehabilitation program
EXPERIMENTALIt consists in a home rehabilitation program. Patients will recieve electroanalgesia with TENS and an exercise program following the McKenzie method. At first and second sessions, patients will be instructed on how to use electroanalgesia and how to perform the exercises. Then, patients will perform the therapy at home. Patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 4 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions
e-Health program
ACTIVE COMPARATORIt consists in a support system for the treatment of chronic low back pain based on web technologies. The system can register a subject and provide a treatment of electroanalgesia and exercise through the Mckenzie method. Video applications of electroanalgesia and exercises will be shown to patients who use their computer or mobile device to access the platform through the Internet. The treatments will be recommended by the system based on the database that is configured to accommodate the application of electroanalgesia and McKenzie exercises based on the diagnosis according to the McKenzie method.patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 4 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions
Interventions
It consists in a home rehabilitation program performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.
It consists in an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Low back pain ≥ 3 months.
- Age between 30 and 67 years old.
- Score ≥ 4 points on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
- Not being receiving physical therapy.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of lumbar stenosis.
- Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis.
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
- Treatment with corticosteroids or oral medication in recent weeks.
- History of spine surgery.
- Contraindication of analgesic electrical therapy.
- Have previously received a treatment of electrical analgesia or exercise.
- Central or peripheral nervous system disease.
- Agoraphobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Almeria University
Almería, 04001, Spain
Related Publications (10)
Von Korff M, Moore JC. Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00016.
PMID: 11346328BACKGROUNDSchaafsma FG, Whelan K, van der Beek AJ, van der Es-Lambeek LC, Ojajarvi A, Verbeek JH. Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3.
PMID: 23990391BACKGROUNDBecker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM, Donner-Banzhoff N. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181cd656f.
PMID: 21374895BACKGROUNDWalker BF. The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Jun;13(3):205-17. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003.
PMID: 10872758BACKGROUNDElfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):125-34. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00002.
PMID: 11805656BACKGROUNDHaladay DE, Miller SJ, Challis J, Denegar CR. Quality of systematic reviews on specific spinal stabilization exercise for chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;43(4):242-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4346. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
PMID: 23321935BACKGROUNDPalacin-Marin F, Esteban-Moreno B, Olea N, Herrera-Viedma E, Arroyo-Morales M. Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):947-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281a36c.
PMID: 23238489BACKGROUNDDescarreaux M, Normand MC, Laurencelle L, Dugas C. Evaluation of a specific home exercise program for low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Oct;25(8):497-503. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.127078.
PMID: 12381971BACKGROUNDPetersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S, Jacobsen S. The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 15;27(16):1702-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00004.
PMID: 12195058BACKGROUNDKhadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, Wells GA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3.
PMID: 18843638BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, PhD
Almeria University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2020
First Posted
February 25, 2020
Study Start
September 5, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 31, 2021
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09