Neuromuscular Monitoring:TOFCuff Versus EMG
Comparison of the TOFCuff Monitor Versus Electromyography in Neuromuscular Monitoring
1 other identifier
observational
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mechanomyography (MMG) is considered the gold-standard for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring. However, it is quite bulky and difficult to use on a routine basis. Therefore, alternative methods like Acceleromyography (AMG), Electromyography (EMG) and the TOF-CUFF method have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the TOF-Cuff monitor and Electromyography (EMG-NMT module with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor) data following rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade and its reversal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 10, 2020
CompletedSeptember 22, 2021
September 1, 2021
4 months
February 19, 2020
September 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
TOFR (Train Of Four Ratio)
For this measurement, patient is stimulated with four twitches at a known stimulation current. Each twitch is performed every 500ms. The neuromuscular response for each twitch is gathered. Train Of Four ratio consists of the weighting of the fourth stimulus against the first stimulus. It can be calculated also as a percentage.
Baseline
Counts
When performing the Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, count of the twitches that are higher than 0.
Baseline
PTC
Once patient is in a deep neuromuscular blockade, all twitches from Train Of Four (TOF) measurement are 0. In order to evaluate the neuromuscular response, Post Tetanic Count (PTC) measurement is performed. PTC is splitted in two steps. First, during 5 seconds a tetanic stimulation is performed at 50Hz. If no response is elicited, after a pause of 3 seconds 15 single-twitch stimualtion at 1Hz are performed. PTC value is the count of the single-twitches that are higher than 0.
Baseline
T1
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the first neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Baseline
T2
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the second neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Baseline
T3
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the third neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Baseline
T4
For Train Of Four (TOF) measurement, amplitude of the fourth neuromuscular stimulation response. Units depend on the measurement techniques.
Baseline
PID
Diastolic pressure in mmHg
Baseline
PIS
Systolic pressure in mmHg
Baseline
PIM
Mean pressure in mmHg
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Temperature
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Control samples
For each case, neuromuscular measurements gathered with GE CARESCAPE B450 monitor (E-NMT module).
Case samples
For each case, neuromuscular measurements gathered with TOFCuff monitor.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II, between 18-65 years and scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II
- Patients who give their written informed consent
- Elective surgery under general anesthesia that according to the anesthetic plan muscle relaxants will be administered
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to give their informed consent
- Patients who present any of the contraindications for the devices used in the study
- Women of childbearing age who do not use effective contraceptive methods, pregnant women, with suspicion of pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Patients with the following criteria: upper limb peripheral vascular pathologies, a difficult airway, myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular diseases, use of medication that may alter NMT
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Médico Teknon
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):110-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c07428. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
PMID: 19910616BACKGROUNDVeiga Ruiz G, Garcia Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreno Caparros M, Garcia Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Dec;64(10):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Jun 27. English, Spanish.
PMID: 28662770BACKGROUNDRodiera J, Serradell A, Alvarez-Gomez JA, Aliaga L. The cuff method: a pilot study of a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00777.x.
PMID: 16223405BACKGROUNDChecketts MR, Jenkins B, Pandit JJ. Implications of the 2015 AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:3-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13736. No abstract available.
PMID: 28044335BACKGROUNDDahaba AA, von Klobucar F, Rehak PH, List WF. The neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2002 Mar;94(3):591-6; table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00021.
PMID: 11867381BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorena Silva Gil, MD
Servei d'Anestesiologia Centro Médico Teknon
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Posted
February 24, 2020
Study Start
January 15, 2020
Primary Completion
May 10, 2020
Study Completion
May 10, 2020
Last Updated
September 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share