Gait Analysis of a Lateral-Pivot Design Total Knee Replacement
1 other identifier
observational
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous motion analysis studies have demonstrated excellent ability to distinguish subtle differences in gait between normal subjects and those suffering from arthritis. With proper techniques and analysis differences between osteoarthritis patient groups can be distinguished. Previous research has indicated that subjects who received a single-radius design total knee replacement have superior gait performance that those who received a multi-radius design total knee replacement. The DJO Global Empowr PS Knee System is a single-radius lateral pivot design. This design should achieve reproducible more natural knee function and improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. A motion analysis laboratory will be used to collect gait data from patients who are going to receive a Empowr PS knee device and also from age-matched control subjects. These data will be compared with data previously collected from patients who received Stryker Triathlon devices, Biomet Vanguard devices and age-matched healthy control subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 2, 2029
ExpectedMay 6, 2022
May 1, 2022
6.2 years
February 12, 2020
May 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (27)
Knee flexion angle during swing
Compare maximum knee flexion angle in degrees during swing between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
Pre-op
Knee flexion angle during swing
Compare maximum knee flexion angle in degrees during swing between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
Knee flexion angle during swing
Compare maximum knee flexion angle in degrees during swing between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 months post-op
Knee flexion angle during stance
Compare maximum knee flexion angle in degrees during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
pre-op
Knee flexion angle during stance
Compare maximum knee flexion angle in degrees during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
Knee flexion angle during stance
Compare maximum knee flexion angle in degrees during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 months post-op
Knee adduction angle during stance
Compare maximum knee adduction angle in degrees during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
pre-op
Knee adduction angle during stance
Compare maximum knee adduction angle in degrees during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
Knee adduction angle during stance
Compare maximum knee adduction angle in degrees during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.knee replacement (DJO Empowr) and single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) and multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacements.
12 months post-op
Knee flexion moment
Compare maximum knee flexion moment normalised to subject body weight (N-m/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
pre-op
Knee flexion moment
Compare maximum knee flexion moment normalised to subject body weight (N-m/kg) during stance between between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
Knee flexion moment
Compare maximum knee flexion moment normalised to subject body weight (N-m/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 months post-op
Knee adduction moment
Compare maximum knee adduction moment normalised to subject body weight (N-m/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
Pre-op
Knee adduction moment
Compare maximum knee adduction moment normalised to subject body weight (N-m/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), oe a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
Knee adduction moment
Compare maximum knee adduction moment normalised to subject body weight (N-m/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 months post-op
Knee power
Compare maximum knee power in the sagittal plane normalised to subject body weight (W/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
Pre-op
Knee power
Compare maximum knee power in the sagittal plane normalised to subject body weight (W/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 month post-op
Knee power
Compare maximum knee power in the sagittal plane normalised to subject body weight (W/kg) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 month post-op
Vertical GRF
Compare maximum vertical ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
pre-op
Vertical GRF
Compare maximum vertical ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
Vertical GRF
Compare maximum vertical ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 month post-op
AP GRF
Compare maximum anterior-posterior ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
Pre-op
AP GRF
Compare maximum anterior-posterior ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
AP GRF
Compare maximum anterior-posterior ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 months post-op
ML GRF
Compare maximum medial-lateral ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
pre-op
ML GRF
Compare maximum anterior-posterior ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), or a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement.
6 months post-op
ML GRF
Compare maximum anterior-posterior ground reaction force normalised to subject body weight (unitless) during stance between healthy controls, and subjects with a dual pivot design total knee replacement (DJO Empowr), a single-radius (Triathlon, Stryker) knee replacement or a multi-radius (Vanguard, Zimmer Biomet) knee replacement.
12 months post-op
Secondary Outcomes (30)
Ankle dorsiflexion angle during swing
Pre-op
Ankle dorsiflexion angle during swing
6 months post-op
Ankle dorsiflexion angle during swing
12 months post-op
Ankle plantarflexion angle during stance
pre-op
Ankle plantarflexion angle during stance
6 months post-op
- +25 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
DJO subjects for surgical technique
Subjects who meet the inclusion criteria and receive a DJO Empowr total knee replacement but will not participate in motion data collection
DJO subjects for data collection
Subjects who meet the inclusion criteria and consent to be in the study will receive a DJO Empowr total knee replacement and participate in motion data collections at pre-op, and 6 and 12 months post-op. Subjects will also participate in pre-op, 6 month, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, and 10 year post-op clinical data collections
Prospective control subjects
Healthy age matched subjects who did not have any knee osteoarthritis and participated in motion data collections.
Stryker TKA subjects
Subjects who met the inclusion criteria and consented to be in a study whereby they received a Stryker Triathlon total knee replacement and participated in motion analysis pre-surgery and 6 and 12 months post-surgery.
Biomet TKA subjects
Subjects who met the inclusion criteria and consented to be in a study whereby they received a Biomet Vanguard total knee replacement and participated in motion analysis pre-surgery and 12 months post-surgery.
Retrospective control subjects
Healthy age matched subjects who did not have any knee osteoarthritis and participated in motion data collections.
Interventions
Patients will receive a DJO Empowr PS Knee System total knee replacement
Patients received a Stryker Triathlon Total Knee System total knee replacement
Patients received a Biomet Vanguard Complete Knee System total knee replacement
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will consist of 4 groups: 1) Healthy age matched controls, 2) Retrospective subjects who have previously received either a Stryker Triathlon TKA or a Biomet Vanguard TKA and participated in IRB approved gait analysis at pre-op, 6 month, and 12 month post-op time points
You may qualify if:
- Controls:
- At least 50 years of age.
- Subjects who provide signed and IRB approved informed consent for gait analysis data collection
- Retrospective subjects:
- Subjects who had primary total knee replacement with either Stryker Triathlon Total Knee System or Biomet Vanguard Complete Knee System.
- Subjects at least 50 years of age at the time of the surgery.
- Subjects who previously provided signed and informed consent for gait analysis data collection under approval of the Sun Health Institutional Review Board
- Cases that followed product labeling.
- Prospective subjects:
- Subjects who are eligible for DJO Global's Empowr total knee replacement.
- Subjects at least 50 years of age at the time of the surgery.
- Subjects who are willing to provide signed and IRB approved informed consent for gait analysis data collection.
- Cases that followed product labeling.
You may not qualify if:
- Controls:
- Controls with any musculoskeletal injury or disorder.
- Controls that are pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant.
- Controls with a BMI\>40
- Retrospective subjects:
- Subjects with inflammatory arthritis or psoriatic arthritis at the time of surgery.
- Subjects that are pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant.
- Subjects with a BMI\>40
- Subjects who had an active infection or suspected latent infection in or about the joint at the time of surgery.
- Subjects whose bone stock was compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which could not provide adequate support and/or fixation of the prosthesis.
- Subjects who had any mental or neuromuscular disorders which created an unacceptable risk of prosthesis instability, prosthesis fixation failure, or complication in postoperative care.
- Subjects with severe instability of the knee joint secondary to the absence of collateral ligament integrity and function.
- Prospective subjects:
- Subjects with inflammatory arthritis or psoriatic arthritis at the time of surgery.
- Subjects that are pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- More Foundationlead
- Encore Medical, L.P.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
MORE Foundation
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott Siverhus, MD
The CORE Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2020
First Posted
February 19, 2020
Study Start
February 2, 2017
Primary Completion
April 2, 2023
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 2, 2029
Last Updated
May 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share