Study Stopped
PI left and study not feasible as written in the protocol
Effect of Synchronized vs. Continuous HFNC Using NAVA on WOB in Infants With BPD
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients will be randomized to begin the study with either NAVA-synchronized or continuous HFNC. Each patient will receive two 15-minute trials at different levels of continuous HFNC and two 15-minute trials at corresponding levels of synchronized HFNC. In synchronized HFNC, using the NIV NAVA mode on the ventilator each subject will receive a constant minimum flow, but with each neurally triggered breath (as measured with an Edi catheter), an additional flow will be given to the patient. This differs from continuous HFNC in which the subject receives a constant flow without variation. Subjects will be observed during the entirety of these trials. Values for the primary and secondary outcomes will be monitored, recorded, and calculated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 28, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2022
CompletedMay 5, 2022
April 1, 2022
2 months
August 29, 2019
November 29, 2021
April 8, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Work of Breathing
estimated using swing Edi
15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Thoracoabdominal Asynchrony
15 minutes
Uncalibrated Tidal Volume
15 minutes
FiO2 Requirement
15 minutes
Oxygen Saturation
15 minutes
Transcutaneous Oxygen Level
15 minutes
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Alternating between Synchronized and Continuous HFNC at 6 and 8 LPM (starting with synchronized)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will first receive HFNC synchronized to his/her own efforts via NAVA at 6 LPM followed by continuous HFNC at 6 LPM and then HFNC synchronized to his/her own efforts via NAVA at 8 LPM followed by continuous HFNC at 8 LPM
Alternating between Synchronized and Continuous HFNC at 6 and 8 LPM (starting with continuous)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will first receive continuous HFNC at 6 LPM followed by HFNC synchronized to his/her own efforts via NAVA at 6 LPM. Next, subjects will receive continuous HFNC at 8 LPM followed by HFNC synchronized to his/her own efforts via NAVA at 8 LPM.
Interventions
HFNC given in synchrony with the subject's own respiratory effort using NAVA at 6 LPM
Standard HFNC therapy at 6 LPM
HFNC given in synchrony with the subject's own respiratory effort using NAVA at 8 LPM
Standard HFNC therapy at 8 LPM
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronological age greater than 28 days
- Gestational age at birth less than 32 weeks and 6 days
- Diagnosis of BPD (supplemental oxygen requirement for greater than or equal to 28 days)
- Currently receiving noninvasive ventilation support (NIV NAVA, NIPPV, nCPAP, HFNC)
You may not qualify if:
- Major congenital anomalies of the heart and lungs
- Post menstrual age greater than 50 weeks 0 days
- Oxygen requirement greater than 40%
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Using the equipment available, we were unable to administer the 6 LPM (per the protocol), so this subject did not receive all of the interventions and therefore did not complete the study. We subsequently terminated the study due to lack of protocol feasibility and the departure of the original PI.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sherry Courtney
- Organization
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sherry E Courtney, MD
University of Arkansas
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2019
First Posted
February 18, 2020
Study Start
December 9, 2020
Primary Completion
January 28, 2021
Study Completion
January 28, 2021
Last Updated
May 5, 2022
Results First Posted
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share