NCT01440647

Brief Summary

Very premature infants often cannot breathe on their own and require assistance with a respirator. Conventional respirators deliver air or oxygen via a breathing tube placed through the mouth to the airway (endotracheal tube). A prolonged use of an endotracheal tube is associated with injury to the lungs. Currently, a premature baby has to be ventilated through an endotracheal tube until he/she can fully breathe independently. In the current study, in order to shorten the time with an endotracheal tube, we utilized an alternative, less invasive ventilation procedure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). This procedure provides help with breathing, but requires only nasal, not endotracheal tubes. We hypothesized that NIPPV might help babies breathe, at an early stage in their recovery, when they could not breathe independently yet. Thus, by switching babies at this early stage from a regular respirator to NIPPV, we should be able to shorten the use of an injurious endotracheal tube.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2007

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 12, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2013

Status Verified

February 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 22, 2011

Results QC Date

December 26, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Respiration, ArtificialInfant, PrematureBronchopulmonary DysplasiaContinuous Positive Airway PressureNon-Invasive Positive-Pressure VentilationIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationHigh-Frequency Ventilation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Days Being Intubated

    30 days from birth

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants With Reintubation

    0-7 days post-extubation

Study Arms (2)

NIPPV

EXPERIMENTAL

Extubation to NIPPV (nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation)

Procedure: Extubation to NIPPV

CPAP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After extubation this arm was placed on CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) and was not offered NIPPV in the first month on life

Procedure: Extubation to CPAP

Interventions

After extubation infants were placed on NIPPV as soon as all the extubation criteria were met

Also known as: NIPPV
NIPPV

After extubation infants were placed on CPAP

Also known as: CPAP
CPAP

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 48 Hours
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Gestational age 24 wks and 0 days through 27 wks and 6 days by obstetric criteria.
  • Infants who are intubated for respiratory distress and received surfactant within 48 hrs of life.
  • Infants whose ventilator settings are: ventilatory rate ≥ 26 breaths per minute. If the baby is on the high frequency oscillatory ventilator (HFOV) settings are MAP(mean airway pressure) ≥ 9, amplitude ≥ 2xMAP and frequency ≤ 13 Hertz.
  • Infants who have never been previously extubated.

You may not qualify if:

  • Infants enrolled in competing trials.
  • Participation refused by parent/attending physician/ parent unavailable for consent.
  • Infants with any major congenital abnormality.
  • Postoperative patients from any surgery.
  • Infants in extremis/decided upon not to receive intensive care.
  • Ventilator settings lower than the intervention group.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Women and Infants Hospital of RI

Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaRespiratory AspirationPremature Birth

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ventilator-Induced Lung InjuryLung InjuryLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesRespiration DisordersPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsObstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Abbot R. Laptook, MD, Professor of Pediatrics The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University M
Organization
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Study Officials

  • Olga A DeSimone, MD

    The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Abbot R Laptook, MD

    Women and Infants Hospital of RI

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2011

First Posted

September 26, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

January 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 12, 2013

Results First Posted

March 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-02

Locations