NCT04273958

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled study aims to investigate whether, during a painful medical procedure in an emergency department (ED), the diffusion of a virtual environment through a virtual reality (VR) headset worn by the patient has a greater impact on the patient's pain and anxiety levels than the diffusion of an identical environment through a computer screen. The study design allows differentiating the impact of the medium from that of the media. The feeling of telepresence of patients in both groups and its association with the impact of the medium will also be investigated. In addition, this study aims to explore whether the wearing of VR headphones is considered comfortable and acceptable by patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
117

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 12, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

February 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

painvirtual realityanxietyemergency departmentprocedural pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain reduction

    The primary outcome of this study will be the patients' self-assessment of their pain intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a 100-mm ruler during the procedure in the emergency department. The ruler will be presented to the patients on a digital tablet, and the patients will place the slider along the 100-mm line anchored at each end by the two labels "no pain" / "worst pain imaginable". The numerical value measured in millimeters will be automatically integrated into the electronic Case Report Form (CRF).

    Pain intensity will be assessed immediately before and immediately after the procedure.

  • Anxiety reduction

    The primary outcome of this study will be the patients' self-assessment of their anxiety intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a 100-mm ruler during the procedure in the emergency department. The ruler will be presented to the patients on a digital tablet, and the patients will place the slider along the 100-mm line anchored at each end by the two labels "no anxiety" / "worst anxiety imaginable". The numerical value measured in millimeters will be automatically integrated into the electronic Case Report Form (CRF).

    Anxiety intensity will be assessed immediately before and immediately after the procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Telepresence

    Telepresence feeling will be assessed immediately at the end of the procedure.

  • Level of dissociation

    Dissociation will be assessed immediately at the end of the procedure.

  • Patient's acceptance of the technology

    Acceptance will be assessed immediately at the end of the procedure.

  • Patient's comfort with the technology

    Comfort will be assessed immediately at the end of the procedure.

  • Motion sickness

    Motion sickness will be assessed immediately at the end of the procedure.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Virtual reality

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention will consist of the use of a virtual reality helmet during the painful medical procedure. The content has been developed by a private company with the goal of providing a relaxing and soothing exploration of a virtual world.

Device: Virtual reality helmet

Computer screen

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The comparator will consist in the screening of the same virtual world on the computer screen.

Device: Computer screen

Interventions

During a painful procedure, the patient will watch a virtual world in a virtual reality helmet, while wearing a noise-canceling headset with soothing music.

Virtual reality

During a painful procedure, the patient will watch the same virtual world, while wearing a noise-canceling headset with the same soothing music.

Computer screen

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient whose care requires a medical procedure (suture, cast placement and repositioning, fracture reduction, paracentesis, thoracocentesis and lumbar puncture).

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable patient (e.g., admitted to the intensive care unit or deemed unstable by the physician in charge);
  • Patients without decision-making capacity or with whom it is difficult to communicate:
  • Altered mental status (e.g., cognitive impairment, mental retardation, acute confusional state, acute psychosis).
  • Intoxication,
  • Drug abuse
  • Patient unable to communicate in French at a level sufficient to give informed consent and answer questions about pain and anxiety;
  • Patient who is hard of hearing;
  • Patient unable to see films on screen or in VR due to vision problems (e.g., blindness or without his/her glasses).
  • Patients unable to understand the use of the EVA strips;
  • Part of the body where the altered procedure is to be performed (e.g. sensitivity disorder, lymphedema...)
  • Patient with a head injury that prevents the use of RV helmet;
  • Intended use of sedation analgesia with a dissociative agent (midazolam, ketamine, propofol).
  • Incarcerated patient;
  • Patient transferred from another hospital;
  • Patient who participated in this study at a previous consultation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Bantick SJ, Wise RG, Ploghaus A, Clare S, Smith SM, Tracey I. Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI. Brain. 2002 Feb;125(Pt 2):310-9. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf022.

    PMID: 11844731BACKGROUND
  • Downey LV, Zun LS. The impact of watching cartoons for distraction during painful procedures in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Oct;28(10):1033-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31826cac1a.

    PMID: 23023471BACKGROUND
  • Sikka N, Shu L, Ritchie B, Amdur RL, Pourmand A. Virtual Reality-Assisted Pain, Anxiety, and Anger Management in the Emergency Department. Telemed J E Health. 2019 Dec;25(12):1207-1215. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0273. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

    PMID: 30785860BACKGROUND
  • Jeffs D, Dorman D, Brown S, Files A, Graves T, Kirk E, Meredith-Neve S, Sanders J, White B, Swearingen CJ. Effect of virtual reality on adolescent pain during burn wound care. J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):395-408. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000019.

    PMID: 24823326BACKGROUND
  • Toledo Del Castillo B, Perez Torres JA, Morente Sanchez L, Escobar Castellanos M, Escobar Fernandez L, Gonzalez Sanchez MI, Rodriguez Fernandez R. [Reducing the pain in invasive procedures during paediatric hospital admissions: Fiction, reality or virtual reality?]. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 Aug;91(2):80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.10.019. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Spanish.

    PMID: 30679136BACKGROUND
  • Garrett B, Taverner T, Gromala D, Tao G, Cordingley E, Sun C. Virtual Reality Clinical Research: Promises and Challenges. JMIR Serious Games. 2018 Oct 17;6(4):e10839. doi: 10.2196/10839.

    PMID: 30333096BACKGROUND
  • Vanhaudenhuyse A, Ledoux D, Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Laureys S, Faymonville ME. CAN SUBJECTIVE RATINGS OF ABSORPTION, DISSOCIATION, AND TIME PERCEPTION DURING "NEUTRAL HYPNOSIS" PREDICT HYPNOTIZABILITY?: An exploratory study. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2019 Jan-Mar;67(1):28-38. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2019.1553765.

    PMID: 30702397BACKGROUND
  • Li SF, Greenwald PW, Gennis P, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ. Effect of age on acute pain perception of a standardized stimulus in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):644-7. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.119849.

    PMID: 11719743BACKGROUND
  • Singer AJ, Richman PB, Kowalska A, Thode HC Jr. Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jun;33(6):652-8.

    PMID: 10339680BACKGROUND
  • Lang EV, Tan G, Amihai I, Jensen MP. Analyzing acute procedural pain in clinical trials. Pain. 2014 Jul;155(7):1365-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

    PMID: 24731852BACKGROUND
  • Page MG, Katz J, Stinson J, Isaac L, Martin-Pichora AL, Campbell F. Validation of the numerical rating scale for pain intensity and unpleasantness in pediatric acute postoperative pain: sensitivity to change over time. J Pain. 2012 Apr;13(4):359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    PMID: 22424915BACKGROUND
  • Bosso L, Espejo T, Taffe P, Caillet-Bois D, Christen T, Berna C, Hugli O. Analgesic and Anxiolytic Effects of Virtual Reality During Minor Procedures in an Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;81(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.04.015. Epub 2022 May 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAnxiety DisordersEmergenciesPain, Procedural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental DisordersDisease AttributesPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Olivier Hugli, MD, MPH

    University of Lausanne Hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The study will be a randomized controlled study. In order to minimize bias, one investigator will randomize the patient to one of the two groups, set up the medium to which the patient is assigned, and be present during the procedure. Patients will evaluate their pain and anxiety levels themselves using an electronic tablet, without the help of the investigator.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Each patient will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between the two arms of the study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2020

First Posted

February 18, 2020

Study Start

February 12, 2020

Primary Completion

September 30, 2020

Study Completion

September 30, 2020

Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations