Does Heart Rate Variance (HRV) Biofeedback Help Regulate Emotions and Improve Mindfulness in Mentally Unwell Offenders?
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
14 participants residing in a forensic psychiatric hospital completed 15 Heart Rate Variance (HRV) biofeedback sessions. They completed 4 psychometric questionnaires, pre, during and post biofeedback training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 28, 2020
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
September 1, 2019
7 months
January 10, 2020
February 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Difficulties in Emotional Regulation (DERS)
a 36 item self-report questionnaire developed to assess adult difficulties in emotional regulation. six specific dimensions which include; difficulties accepting emotional responses (acceptance), controlling impulse behaviours (impulse), emotional awareness (awareness), emotional clarity (clarity), assessing emotion regulation strategies (strategies) and engaging in goal oriented behaviour when emotionally aroused (goals). Internal consistency for Cronbach's alpha was .93 for the total scale and for DERS-A, .85, DERS-I, .89, DERS-A, .86, DERS-C, .80, DERS-S, .88, and DERS-G, .84
30 minutes (pre, during and post biofeedback training)
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
Consists of 39 items assessing five facets of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience. Items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true). The FFMQ has been shown to have good internal consistency and significant relationships in the predicted directions with a variety of constructs related to mindfulness. The internal consistencies (Cronbach α) for these facets have been reported as 0.75 for FFMQ-NR, 0.83 for FFMQ-O, 0.87 for FFMQ-A, 0.91 for FFMQ-D, and 0.87 for FFMQ-NJ
30 minutes (pre, during and post biofeedback training)
Becks Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
A 21-item self-report scale that surveys common symptoms of depression on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. Internal consistency of the BDI-II was demonstrated to be good (Cronbach's α=.91; Beck, Steer, Ball et al., 1996) and the 1-week test-retest reliability was shown to be high.
15 minutes (pre, during and post biofeedback training)
Becks Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Consists of 21 statements used to measure the severity of an individual's anxiety. When completing the BAI, individuals rate the severity of each symptom on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely-I could barely stand it). Good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=.92) and test-retest reliability (r=.75).
15 minutes (pre, during and post biofeedback training)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Heart Rate Variance (HRV) biofeedback
10 minutes per session
Study Arms (1)
Heart Rate Variance (HRV) biofeedback training
EXPERIMENTALPatients to participate in 15 biofeedback sessions, 3 times a week (5 weeks in total).
Interventions
Patients asked to complete these 4 questionnaires pre, during and post biofeedback training
Sensors placed on fingers to capture heart rate and skin temperature
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female offenders aged 18 and above.
- Male and female offenders who reside in a medium and low Forensic Psychiatric Hospital.
- Individuals who have the capacity to consent to take part in the research
- Individuals deemed mentally stable and were found to have capacity to consent by their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT).
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals under the age of 18.
- Individuals who are not detained in a Forensic Psychiatric Hospital.
- Individuals deemed not well enough to consent by their Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT).
- A level of cognitive impairment determined by diagnosis that would prevent individuals from understanding the feedback obtained. via pictorial or verbal prompts
- Individuals with specific breathing difficulties (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) that would restrict them from being able to practice the breathing techniques.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Birmingham
Birmingham, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Georgina V Atkinson
University of Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2020
First Posted
February 17, 2020
Study Start
October 11, 2017
Primary Completion
April 27, 2018
Study Completion
March 28, 2020
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share