Ultra-high-resolution CT vs. Conventional Angiography for Detecting Coronary Heart Disease
Ultra-High Resolution CT vs. Conventional Angiography for Detecting Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease - The Core-PRECISION MULTI-CENTER STUDY
1 other identifier
interventional
175
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
Cardiac catheterization with invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard for determining the presence or absence of significant coronary heart disease (CHD). However, cardiac catheterization is costly and, as an invasive procedure, it is associated with some risk of adverse events, rarely even stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Recent advances in multi-detector computed tomography angiography (CTA) have allowed rapid, noninvasive coronary artery imaging in patients with suspected CHD. CTA generally yields high accuracy for identifying patients with CHD when compared to cardiac catheterization. However, diagnostic accuracy is reduced in the setting of severe coronary artery calcification and coronary stents due to its inferior spatial resolution compared to cardiac catheterization. Because high-risk patients often have severe coronary calcification or stents, the application of CTA has been particularly limited in this important patient group. Recently, an ultrahigh-resolution CT scanner was released which has shown promise to overcome the limitation of conventional CTA in the setting of severe coronary artery calcification or stents. This ultrahigh-resolution "precision" CT scanner (UHR-CT) contains detector rows with half the width than currently available systems (0.25 mm vs. 0.5 mm) resulting in approximately twice the spatial resolution. The purpose of this investigation is to test the hypothesis that high-resolution CTA is not inferior to the current standard of cardiac catheterization for identifying significant CHD in patients with high-risk characteristics, including severe coronary artery calcification and coronary stents. The investigators propose to enroll 50 patients over 24-30 months in this investigation as part of a multicenter study. Patients referred for cardiac catheterization with known CHD and suspected obstructive coronary artery stenosis will be included. All patients will undergo both cardiac catheterization and UHR-CT for determining significant CHD as defined by coronary functional assessment. The primary end point will be the diagnostic accuracy by area-under-curve (AUC) method for identifying patients with hemodynamically significant CHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 16, 2026
CompletedJune 16, 2026
May 1, 2026
5.7 years
February 13, 2020
April 21, 2026
May 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Correctly Classified Coronary Artery Disease Patients (True Positives and True Negatives)
The primary outcome was the patient-level diagnostic accuracy of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD), using quantitative flow ratio (QFR ≤0.80) as the reference standard. For each patient, the highest-grade stenosis across all coronary vessels determined by UHR-CT and ICA was used to classify the test result. Diagnostic accuracy was defined as the percentage of correctly classified patients (true positives and true negatives) relative to QFR.
Up to 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of UHR-CT and ICA
Up to 90 days
Percentage Agreement Between UHR-CT and ICA
Up to 90 days
Accurately Detected Functionally Significant Stenosis
Up to 90 days
Other Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Accuracy Across Prespecified Subgroups
Up to 90 days
Study Arms (2)
CT Angiography
EXPERIMENTALResearch CT angiography.
Conventional Angiography
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard medical care which includes cardiac catheterization and invasive coronary angiography.
Interventions
Diagnostic invasive coronary angiography
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 45-85 years with history of CHD will be asked to participate. History of CHD is defined as prior documentation of a coronary artery stenosis of 50% or greater by coronary angiography or by prior documentation of coronary artery revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Women of child bearing potential must demonstrate a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours of the study CTA.
- Suspected obstructive coronary artery stenosis based on clinical history and/or noninvasive testing, prompting a clinical referral for invasive coronary angiography; and/or planned PCI within the next 60 days.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign the Informed Consent Form.
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast media
- History of multiple myeloma or previous organ transplantation
- Elevated serum creatinine (\> 1.5mg/dl) or calculated creatinine clearance of \< 60 ml/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula
- Atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia, or advanced atrioventricular block (second or third-degree heart block)
- Evidence of severe symptomatic heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV);
- Known or suspected moderate or severe aortic stenosis
- Previous coronary artery bypass or other cardiac surgery
- Patients without a history of CHD who had no or only mild coronary calcification on chest CT imaging within the past 5 years or had most recent coronary calcium scan with a score \<400
- Suspected acute coronary syndrome
- Presence of any other history or condition that the investigator feels would be problematic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Canon Medical Systems, USAcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
São Paulo, Brazil
Iwate Medical University
Morioka, Japan
Related Publications (7)
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):552-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056.
PMID: 16053973RESULTArbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 24;59(4):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.079.
PMID: 22261160RESULTWykrzykowska JJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, Godoy G, Miller JM, Lin S, Vavere A, Paul N, Niinuma H, Hoe J, Brinker J, Khosa F, Sarwar S, Lima J, Clouse ME. Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):85-92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2652.
PMID: 20028909RESULTTakagi H, Tanaka R, Nagata K, Ninomiya R, Arakita K, Schuijf JD, Yoshioka K. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography with ultra-high-resolution CT: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PMID: 29571798RESULTTanaka R, Yoshioka K, Takagi H, Schuijf JD, Arakita K. Novel developments in non-invasive imaging of peripheral arterial disease with CT: experience with state-of-the-art, ultra-high-resolution CT and subtraction imaging. Clin Radiol. 2019 Jan;74(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
PMID: 29627067RESULTEinstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11):1290-305. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688101. No abstract available.
PMID: 17846343RESULTRochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Miller JM, Niinuma H, Yoshioka K, Kitagawa K, Nakamori S, Laham R, Vavere AL, Cerci RJ, Mehra VC, Nomura C, Kofoed KF, Jinzaki M, Kuribayashi S, de Roos A, Laule M, Tan SY, Hoe J, Paul N, Rybicki FJ, Brinker JA, Arai AE, Cox C, Clouse ME, Di Carli MF, Lima JA. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J. 2014 May;35(17):1120-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht488. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PMID: 24255127RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study limitations include the selection of investigators at high-volume centers with skilled staff, personnel and readers, as well as the exclusion of patients with active arrhythmias.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Armin A. Zadeh
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Armin A Zadeh, MD PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2020
First Posted
February 17, 2020
Study Start
November 22, 2019
Primary Completion
July 31, 2025
Study Completion
July 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 16, 2026
Results First Posted
June 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data belong to sponsor who may or may not release data to other researchers