Living Well, Dying Well. a Research Programme to Support Living Until the End
iLIVE
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
11 countries
11
Brief Summary
The iLIVE project involves a cohort study in which patients with an estimated life expectancy of six months or less are followed until they die. In total, the investigators will include 2200 patients in 11 countries, i.e. 200 per country. The primary outcome for the cohort study is a descriptive assessment of the concerns, expectations and preferences around dying and end-of-life care of patients and their relatives, in different settings and cultures..
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for all trials
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 11, 2025
September 1, 2023
2.9 years
December 27, 2019
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Concerns, expectations and preferences around dying and end-of-life care (descriptive assessment of prevalence)
Self developed questions, adapted from the Serious Illness Conversation Guide and the AEOLI questionnaire.
Baseline
Concerns, expectations and preferences around dying and end-of-life care (descriptive assessment of prevalence)
Self developed questions, which were inspired by the Serious Illness Conversation Guide and the AEOLI questionnaire.
One month of follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (range 0-10, with higher score meaning worse outcome)
At baseline and after one month of follow-up
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C15-Palliative Care questionnaire, quality of life item (range 1-7, with higher score indicating better outcome)
At baseline and after one month of follow-up
EuroQol-5d questionnaire (range 1-5 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)
At baseline and after one month of follow-up
ICECAP Supportive Care Measure (range 1-4 per item, with higher score indicating worse outcome)
At baseline and after one month of follow-up
Use of medical interventions (hospitalisation, medication, surgery, other interventions)
One week
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients in the last phase of life
Patients in the last phase of life and their families
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
All competent adult patients with an estimated life expectancy of six months or less are eligible, regardless of their diagnosis, gender or age, or place of residence, and their relatives
You may qualify if:
- The patient is aware that recovering from his/her disease is unlikely, to be assessed by the attending physician
- The attending physician would not be surprised if the patient were to die within 6 months
- If the physician is uncertain about the surprise question, the patient is eligible if presenting with at least one SPICT indicator:
- General SPICT indicators:
- Unplanned hospital admission
- Performance status is poor or deteriorating, with limited reversibility (eg stays in bed or in a chair for more than half the day)
- Depends on others for care due to increasing physical and/or mental health problems; person's carer needs more help and support
- Progressive weight loss; remains underweight; low muscle mass
- Persistent symptoms despite optimal treatment of underlying condition(s)
- Person (or family) asks for palliative care; chooses to reduce, stop or not have treatment; or wishes to focus on quality of life
- Disease-specific SPICT indicators:
- Cancer:
- Functional ability deteriorating due to progressive cancer
- Too frail for cancer treatment or treatment is for symptom control
- Neurological disease:
- +27 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is incapable of filling in a questionnaire in the country's main language or in English (patients may be supported by relatives when filling in the questionnaire)
- The patient is incapable of providing informed consent to participate in the study, to be assessed by the attending physician
- Family, friend or other close relative of the patient
- years or older
- The relative is aware that it is unlikely that that patient will recover from his/her disease
- The relative is incapable of filling in a questionnaire in the country's main language or in English
- The relative is incapable of providing informed consent to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Centerlead
- University of Liverpoolcollaborator
- Klinikum der Universität Kölncollaborator
- Lund Universitycollaborator
- The University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnikcollaborator
- University of Berncollaborator
- Cudeca Hospice Foundationcollaborator
- Helse-Bergen HFcollaborator
- Landspitali University Hospitalcollaborator
- Pallium Latinoamérica N.G.Ocollaborator
- University of Humanistic Studiescollaborator
- Medical University of Viennacollaborator
- Arohanui Hospice Service Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (11)
Pallium Latinoamérica
Buenos Aires, Argentina
University Hospital Cologne
Cologne, Germany
Landspitali National University Hospital of Iceland
Reykjavik, Iceland
Agnes van der Heide
Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Netherlands
Arohanui Hospice Service
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik
Ljubljana, Slovenia
Centro de Cuidados Paliativos Cudeca
Málaga, Spain
Skåne University Hospital
Lund, Sweden
Bern University Hospital
Bern, Switzerland
University of Liverpool
Liverpool, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Agnes van der Heide, PhD
Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2019
First Posted
February 17, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
July 31, 2023
Study Completion
July 31, 2023
Last Updated
March 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-09