Fertility Preservation in Male AYA With Cancer
Optimizing Fertility Preservation and Decision Quality in Male AYA With Cancer: A Family-centered Intervention
2 other identifiers
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Very little is known about how medical providers can help adolescent and young adults (AYAs) and their caregivers make decisions about fertility preservation (sperm banking) before beginning cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to see if having a guided conversation about fertility preservation increases preservation rates and/or satisfaction with the decision among AYA males with cancer. The primary hypothesis is that compared to standard of care control group (routine fertility consult at diagnosis, n=20), AYAs in the intervention arm (routine fertility consult at diagnosis + FP Decision Tool and Facilitated Conversation by trained interventionist) will have higher rates of FP uptake. The secondary hypothesis is that families in the intervention group will report better FP decision quality compared to those in the control arm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 4, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 29, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.9 years
February 11, 2020
March 14, 2025
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fertility Preservation (FP) Uptake
Fertility Preservation (FP) Uptake (measured by the number of adolescents/adolescents of caregivers who attempted FP)
Baseline to before AYA begins treatment (generally within one to two weeks from baseline)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - AYA
1-month post randomization
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - Caregiver
1-month post randomization
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - AYA
1-year post randomization
Brief Subjective Decision Quality (BSDQ) Questionnaire - Caregiver
1-year post randomization
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care (Control)
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will receive a standard of care fertility consult.
FP Decision Tool and Discussion (Treatment)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive a standard of care fertility consult and will participate in a family-centered psychoeducational intervention consisting of completing a FP Decision Tool and participating in a guided discussion about responses and discrepancies identified in the FP Decision Tool.
Interventions
The intervention will be administered by a trained interventionist. The interventionist will administer the digital FP Decision Tool to families in the intervention arm. The tool asks questions examining each AYA's thoughts or feelings regarding parenthood and fertility preservation. The parent version asks the same questions, plus additional questions asking the parent to rate their son's feelings on certain topics (i.e., whether their son wants to have a child, whether their son would be as happy with an adopted child versus a biological child). Items are coded based on the domains of the Health Belief Model (perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived threats, self-efficacy, and cues to action). Items are scored and the trained interventionist will facilitate a guided discussion based on the family's responses and discrepancies.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male
- Aged 12-25 years
- Expected to have adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and/or gonadal radiation) for newly diagnosed cancer
- Pubertal (at least Tanner stage 2-3, eligible for sperm banking as determined in the fertility consult)
- Proficient in English
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive deficit that precludes completing measures
- Parents are non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Leena Nahatalead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Related Publications (5)
Nahata L, Morgan TL, Lipak KG, Clark OE, Yeager ND, O'Brien SH, Whiteside S, Audino A, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA. Perceptions of participating in family-centered fertility research among adolescent and young adult males newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Nov;66(11):e27966. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27966. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
PMID: 31407498BACKGROUNDNahata L, Dattilo TM, Olsavsky AL, Lipak KG, Whiteside S, Yeager ND, Audino A, Klosky JL, Rausch J, Saraf A, O'Brien SH, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA. Impact of a novel family-centered values clarification tool on adolescent sperm banking attempts at the time of a new cancer diagnosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1561-1569. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02092-6. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
PMID: 33564937BACKGROUNDTheroux CI, Hill KN, Olsavsky AL, Klosky JL, Yeager ND, Audino A, O'Brien SH, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA, Nahata L. Satisfaction with Fertility Preservation Decisions among Adolescent Males with Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 16;13(14):3559. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143559.
PMID: 34298773BACKGROUNDNahata L, Olsavsky A, Dattilo TM, Lipak KG, Whiteside S, Yeager ND, Audino A, Rausch J, Klosky JL, O'Brien SH, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA. Parent-Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives and Sperm Banking Attempts in Adolescent Males With Cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;46(10):1149-1158. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab069.
PMID: 34333651BACKGROUNDStanek C, Theroux CI, Olsavsky AL, Hill KN, Rausch JR, O'Brien SH, Quinn GP, Gerhardt CA, Nahata L. Study protocol for fertility preservation discussions and decisions: A family-centered psychoeducational intervention for male adolescents and emerging adults newly diagnosed with cancer and their families. PLoS One. 2022 Feb 16;17(2):e0263886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263886. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35171948BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Leena Nahata
- Organization
- Nationwide Children's Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leena Nahata, MD
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, the interventionist, and research staff will not be blinded.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2020
First Posted
February 13, 2020
Study Start
February 8, 2021
Primary Completion
January 4, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 29, 2025
Results First Posted
July 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We do not plan on sharing individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers.