Evaluation of Three Different Pulp Capping Materials in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Teeth
Clinical, Radiographic and Histological Evaluation of Three Different Pulp Capping Materials in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
109
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized, controlled, three-arm parallel-group, double-blinded clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and histopathological success of three different pulp-capping materials in one-stage indirect pulp treatment of primary teeth. The study included a total of 109 patients aged 5-9 years who had primary teeth with deep carious lesions with or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis. The teeth were divided into three groups according to the pulp-capping agents: (I) Calcium hydroxide (Ca\[OH\]2) (control group) (n=36), (II) bioactive tricalcium silicate (Biodentine) (n=37), and (III) resin-based tricalcium silicate (TheraCal LC) (n=36). All the teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at postoperative months 6, 12, 18, and 24. A total of 23 primary mandibular second molars that were in their regular exfoliation period (24-40 months) were extracted and fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution. The specimens were evaluated histologically to assess the integrity of the odontoblastic layer, tertiary dentin formation and the quality of the dentin formed, severity of pulpitis, and other pulpal changes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2020
CompletedFebruary 12, 2020
February 1, 2020
7 months
December 26, 2019
February 10, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Clinical success rate of indirect pulp treatment
Treatment is considered a clinical failure if one or more of the following signs are observed: Presence of tenderness to percussion or palpation, spontaneous pain or prolonged pain response, discoloration, infectious symptoms such as fistula or abscess, and pathological mobility. The treatment is regarded successful if clinical evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of clinical success from Baseline at 6 month
Clinical success rate of indirect pulp treatment
Treatment is considered a clinical failure if one or more of the following signs are observed: Presence of tenderness to percussion or palpation, spontaneous pain or prolonged pain response, discoloration, infectious symptoms such as fistula or abscess, and pathological mobility. The treatment is regarded successful if clinical evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of clinical success from baseline to 12 month
Clinical success rate of indirect pulp treatment
Treatment is considered a clinical failure if one or more of the following signs are observed: Presence of tenderness to percussion or palpation, spontaneous pain or prolonged pain response, discoloration, infectious symptoms such as fistula or abscess, and pathological mobility. The treatment is regarded successful if clinical evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of clinical success from baseline to 18 month
Clinical success rate of indirect pulp treatment
Treatment is considered a clinical failure if one or more of the following signs are observed: Presence of tenderness to percussion or palpation, spontaneous pain or prolonged pain response, discoloration, infectious symptoms such as fistula or abscess, and pathological mobility. The treatment is regarded successful if clinical evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of clinical success from baseline to 24 month
Radiographic success rate of indirect pulp treatment
For radiographic evaluation, the treatment is rated as a failure when one or more of the following signs are present: lesions in the furcation or periapical regions, internal or external root resorption, and thickening of the periodontal spaces. The treatment is regarded successful if radiographic evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of radiographic success from baseline to 6 month
Radiographic success rate of indirect pulp treatment
For radiographic evaluation, the treatment is rated as a failure when one or more of the following signs are present: lesions in the furcation or periapical regions, internal or external root resorption, and thickening of the periodontal spaces. The treatment is regarded successful if radiographic evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of radiographic success from baseline to 12 month
Radiographic success rate of indirect pulp treatment
For radiographic evaluation, the treatment is rated as a failure when one or more of the following signs are present: lesions in the furcation or periapical regions, internal or external root resorption, and thickening of the periodontal spaces. The treatment is regarded successful if radiographic evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of radiographic success from baseline to 18 month
Radiographic success rate of indirect pulp treatment
For radiographic evaluation, the treatment is rated as a failure when one or more of the following signs are present: lesions in the furcation or periapical regions, internal or external root resorption, and thickening of the periodontal spaces. The treatment is regarded successful if radiographic evaluation does not indicate any signs of failure.
Change of radiographic success from baseline to 24 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Histological success rate of indirect pulp treatment
up to 40 months (the teeth were extracted in regular exfoliation period (in which the underlying permanent tooth germ had completed 2/3 of root formation).
Study Arms (3)
calcium hydroxide
ACTIVE COMPARATORThirty six primary molar teeth with deep caries lesion were selected to apply indirect pulp therapy with calcium hydroxide. The carious peripheral dentin was removed at the enamel-dentin junction using a high-speed tungsten-carbide bur and the infected and necrotic soft dentin layer in the center was carefully removed to prevent pulp exposure. Cavity excavation was stopped when the residual dentin over the pulp tissue showed increased resistance to manual instrumentation, and the demineralized dentin (affected dentin) was left at the floor of the cavity.The residual demineralized dentin was covered with a thin layer of Ca(OH)2 (approximately 1 mm2) in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer. Afterwards capsule glass ionomer cement was placed on each capping material. Following the etching and bonding process, permanent restoration was finished with composite resin.
Biodentine
EXPERIMENTALThirty seven primary molar teeth were selected to apply indirect pulp therapy with Biodentine. The carious peripheral dentin was removed at the enamel-dentin junction using a high-speed tungsten-carbide-bur and the infected and necrotic soft dentin layer in the center was carefully removed. Cavity excavation was stopped when the residual dentin over the pulp tissue showed increased resistance to manual instrumentation, and the demineralized dentin (affected dentin) was left at the floor of the cavity. A thin layer of tricalcium silicate-containing pulp-capping material (Biodentine) (approximately 1 mm2) consisting of powder and liquid was applied to the demineralized dentin tissue and a 12-min setting time was allowed for hardening, in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer. Afterwards capsule glass ionomer cement was placed on each capping material. Following the etching and bonding process, permanent restoration was finished with composite resin.
TheraCal LC
EXPERIMENTALThirty six primary molar teeth with deep caries lesion were selected to apply indirect pulp therapy with TheraCal LC. The carious peripheral dentin was removed at the enamel-dentin junction using a high-speed tungsten-carbide bur and the infected and necrotic soft dentin layer in the center was carefully removed. Cavity excavation was stopped when the residual dentin over the pulp tissue showed increased resistance to manual instrumentation, and the demineralized dentin (affected dentin) was left at the floor of the cavity. Flowable form of resin-reinforced tricalcium silicate-containing material (TheraCal LC) was applied directly onto the demineralized dentin at a maximum thickness of 1 mm and was polymerized for 20 sec (Valo LED), in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer. Afterwards capsule glass ionomer cement was placed on each capping material. Following the etching and bonding process, permanent restoration was finished with composite resin.
Interventions
Biodentine has been shown to cause increased calcium ion release and this increase has been associated with the presence of pure tricalcium silicate and calcium chloride and the increased Ca(OH)2 formation
TheraCal LC (Bisco Inc, IL, USA) is a light-cured, resin-modified, calcium silicate-based material designed as a direct/indirect pulp-capping material. This agent has been shown to increase the pH on the pulpal surface thereby stimulating regenerative processes in the pulp, and ultimately contributing to the formation of dentin bridge
Calcium hydroxide (Ca\[OH\]2) is a successful pulp-capping agent activating the repair mechanism by stimulating the dentin-pulp complex. Ca(OH)2, with its bactericidal effects, protects the complex from bacterial effects and also has a stimulating effect on dentin remineralization
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Previously untreated, vital and asymptomatic lower primary molars with deep caries lesions considered likely to result in pulp exposure if they were treated by a single and terminal excavation
- Positive pulp sensibility tested by an electric pulp tester and cold stimulation,
- Mild discomfort from chemical and thermal stimuli,
- Cooperative children and parents willing to follow the instructions and report for follow-up.
You may not qualify if:
- Signs of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain, prolonged pain response etc.)
- The presence of percussion or palpation sensitivity, pathological mobility, or infection symptoms like fistula or abscess or discoloration in the clinical examination,
- Absence of normal lamina dura and periodontal range, presence of lesion, internal or external resorption or calcification in or around the root in the radiological examination,
- Children with special health care needs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assoc prof dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2019
First Posted
February 12, 2020
Study Start
February 8, 2015
Primary Completion
September 15, 2015
Study Completion
July 7, 2018
Last Updated
February 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share