Influence of Luting Cement on the Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Pediatric Crowns
1 other identifier
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this split-mouth study was to compare the efficacy of using Bio-active cement versus Packable glass ionomer for cementation of posterior zirconia pediatric crowns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2019
CompletedJune 20, 2019
June 1, 2019
3.4 years
June 18, 2019
June 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
1 week
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
1 month
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
3 months
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
6 months
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
9 months
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
12 months
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
18 months
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
24 months
Number of debonded crowns
Binary outcome (debonded/not debonded), assessed by examination
36 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of fractured crowns
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Gingival condition
1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months
Study Arms (2)
Bio-active cement
EXPERIMENTALBio-active cement dispensed into the crown, and the crown was properly positioned over the tooth, cement was allowed to self-set for 20 seconds while maintaining gentle pressure on the crown, then flash cured using a light curing unit to remove excess cement, buccal and lingual surfaces were light cured for extra 10 seconds each.
Packable glass ionomer
ACTIVE COMPARATORDentin conditioner was applied to the prepared crown surfaces for 20 sec, then rinsed, and dried. Capsule was activated, mixed for 10 seconds in an amalgamator, then loaded into the capsule applier to extrude cement directly into the crown, the crown was properly positioned over the tooth, cement was allowed to self-set for 2 minutes while maintaining gentle pressure on the crown, excess cement was removed before complete setting of cement.
Interventions
A cement used for crown cementation, specially recommended for pediatric esthetic crowns
Glass ionomer cement with improved mechanical properties usually used for restoration of simple small cavities and in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old patients having two contra-lateral mandibular first primary molars indicated for restoration with crowns.
- Presence of sound tooth structure at the cervical margins of the teeth.
- Presence of opposing functioning teeth.
- Included teeth should be assessed clinically as free from active pulpal or periodontal conditions.
- Patient must be in general good health, with no medical contraindication to dental treatment.
- Patient must be available for required recalls as outlined in the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Teeth with defects like hypoplasia or hypocalcification.
- Patients with untreated periodontal disease.
- Patients with any pathological or systemic problems that would not allow the dental procedures in this study to take place.
- Teeth that exhibit mobility.
- Patients that show signs of severe bruxism or teeth clenching.
- Subjects with deleterious oral habits like pencil/pen chewing.
- Uncooperative patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2019
First Posted
June 20, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share