ESG vs LSG: Short-term Nutritional Outcomes
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Comparison With Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Terms of Short-Term Nutritional Outcomes
1 other identifier
observational
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To assess endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in comparison to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy before and 3 months after the procedure in terms of multiple nutrition-related factors, quality of life, weight and other related parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2020
CompletedFebruary 11, 2020
February 1, 2020
5 months
January 30, 2020
February 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (39)
Weight Loss
Weight Loss in kilograms (baseline weight in kilogram - follow-up weight in kilogram)
3 months
Percentage of total weight loss (%TWL)
%TWL = \[(baseline weight in kilogram - weight at 3 months in kilogram) ÷ baseline weight in kilogram\]
3 months
Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL)
%EWL = \[percentage of weight lost compared with excess weight, which is defined as baseline weight in kilogram - the weight corresponding to a BMI of 25 kg/m\^2 in kilogram\])
3 months
Waist Circumference
Waist Circumference in centimeters
3 months
body fat percentage change
change in body fat percentage between baseline and follow-up visits as calculated by a calibrated bioelectrical impedance device
3 months
fat mass change
change in fat mass in kilograms between baseline and follow-up visits as calculated by a calibrated bioelectrical impedance device
3 months
fat mass index change
change in fat mass index in kg/m\^2 between baseline and follow-up visits as calculated by a calibrated bioelectrical impedance device
3 months
fat free mass change
change in fat free mass in kilograms between baseline and follow-up visits as calculated by a calibrated bioelectrical impedance device
3 months
fat free mass index change
change in fat free mass index in kg/m\^2 between baseline and follow-up visits as calculated by a calibrated bioelectrical impedance device
3 months
skeletal muscle mass change
change in skeletal muscle mass in kilograms between baseline and follow-up visits as calculated by a calibrated bioelectrical impedance device
3 months
Dietary habits
Assessment of dietary habits using the How Healthy Is Your Diet questionnaire, developed by the British Heart Foundation 2012 The score is from 0 minimum to 29. Higher score correlates with better dietary habits.
3 months
24-hour dietary recall
Assessment of nutritional intake with 24-hour dietary recall form
3 months
3-day dietary record
Assessment of nutritional intake with 3-day dietary record
3 months
Change in quality of life after procedure
Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II scoring using Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II Self Esteem and Activity Levels SCORING KEY minimum score is -3 and maximum score is 3 a higher score means a better outcome.
3 months
Cholesterol Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
Cholesterol in milligrams per deciliter (\< 200 Desirable)
3 months
Alanine Aminotransferase Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
Alanine Aminotransferase in units per liter (up to 33)
3 months
Gamma glutamyl transferase Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
Gamma glutamyl transferase in units per liter (\< 40)
3 months
sodium Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
sodium in millimoles/liter (136-145)
3 months
platelets Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
platelets in cmm (150.0-450.0)
3 months
MCH Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
MCH in picograms per cell (25.00-32.00)
3 months
potassium Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
potassium in millimoles/liter (3.5-5.1)
3 months
MCV Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
MCV in femtoliters per cell (76.00-97.00)
3 months
MCHC Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
MCHC in grams per deciliter (31.80-35.40)
3 months
Chloride Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
Chloride in millimoles/liter (97-111)
3 months
creatinine Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
creatinine in mg/dL (44-80)
3 months
WBC Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
WBC in × 10\^9/L (4.00-11.00)
3 months
RBC Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
RBC in million mcL (3.80-5.80)
3 months
HCT Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
HCT in % (36.00-46.00)
3 months
serum glucose Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
serum glucose in mg/dL (70-150)
3 months
serum TSH Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
serum TSH in milli-international units per liter (0.38-5.33)
3 months
hemoglobin Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
hemoglobin in grams per deciliter (12.00-16.00)
3 months
Eosinophils Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
Eosinophils in cells per microliter (0.00-6.00)
3 months
monocytes Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
monocytes in percent (0.00-13.70)
3 months
INR plasma ratio Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
INR plasma ratio (no units)
3 months
Basophils Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
Basophils in basophils per microliter (0.00-1.00)
3 months
MPV Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
MPV in fl (7.20-11.10)
3 months
RDW Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
RDW in % (12.40-16.20)
3 months
lymphocytes Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
lymphocytes in % (15.00-50.00)
3 months
neutrophils Biochemical assessment (laboratory assessment)
neutrophils in cells/µL (40.00-75.00)
3 months
Study Arms (2)
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
Patients who underwent endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
Interventions
Bariatric surgical intervention
Eligibility Criteria
27 LSG patients 30 ESG patients
You may qualify if:
- Adult (≥ 18 years old)
- Willingness and ability to participate
- Males and females
- Non-pregnant
You may not qualify if:
- Children (\<18 years old)
- Pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- King Saud Universitylead
- King Saud Medical Citycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
New You Medical Center
Riyadh, 13326, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ghadah M AlGhafees, BSc
King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Nutrition Master's Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2020
First Posted
February 11, 2020
Study Start
June 16, 2019
Primary Completion
November 25, 2019
Study Completion
November 25, 2019
Last Updated
February 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02