Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention - Tandem OCclusion Trial
EASI-TOC
A Multi-centre, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) Controlled Trial Comparing Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Stenting to no Stenting During Thrombectomy for Tandem Occlusion Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
458
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with tandem occlusion or tandem lesion (TL), that is, stroke with an acute intracranial anterior circulation occlusion and an ipsilateral cervical ICA (c-ICA) high-grade stenosis or occlusion, constitute about 15-20% of patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). However, the optimal treatment of acute stroke patients with TL remains uncertain, as relatively few patients with TL were included in the major randomized controlled trials of EVT and management of the c-ICA was generally not specified by protocol nor analyzed post-hoc. Recent large multi-centre retrospective cases series suggest that acutely stented patients may have more favorable outcomes than patients treated with angioplasty alone or those with no acute ICA intervention, but high quality randomized trial data are lacking. EASI-TOC, a phase 3, academic multi-centre, controlled trial (PROBE design) with embedded pilot phase, will seek to determine if in patients undergoing acute intracranial thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke with concurrent ipsilateral symptomatic high-grade (≥70%) atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion of the extracranial ICA, endovascular ICA revascularization with stenting is superior to intracranial thrombectomy alone with regards to functional outcome at 90 days. Patients will be randomized to Acute stenting or No acute stenting (1:1 allocation).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 31, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
November 18, 2023
November 1, 2023
5.8 years
February 3, 2020
November 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical efficacy outcome: proportion of patients achieving a favorable modified Rankin scale score (mRS 0-2)
The proportion of patients achieving a favorable modified Rankin scale score (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (dichotomized) The Modified Rankin Score (mRS) is a 7 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability and 6 indicating death.
90 days ± 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Clinical efficacy outcome: Proportion of patients achieving a favorable modified Rankin scale score (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (dichotomized) according to sex
90 days ± 14 days
Clinical efficacy outcome: Ordinal logistic regression for functional improvement on the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (shift analysis)
90 days ± 14 days
Clinical efficacy outcome: Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score
24 hours ± 8 hours
Clinical efficacy outcome: Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score
90 days ± 14 days
Clinical efficacy outcome: Median Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score
90 days ± 14 days
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (13)
Safety outcome: Proportion of patients with any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)
24 hours ± 8 hours
Safety outcome: Proportion of patients with a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH)
24 hours ± 8 hours
Safety outcome: Proportion of patients with death of any cause
90 days ± 14 days
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Acute Stenting
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients in this arm will receive standard of care with regards to intracranial thrombectomy and use of intravenous thrombolysis. In this arm, the cervical carotid artery stenosis will be revascularized with a stent during the acute thrombectomy procedure.
No Acute Stenting
NO INTERVENTIONAll patients in this arm will receive standard of care with regards to intracranial thrombectomy and use of intravenous thrombolysis. In this arm, the cervical carotid artery stenosis will be not revascularized with a stent during the acute thrombectomy procedure.
Interventions
The type of stent should be one commonly used for ICA stenting. Balloon angioplasty before and/or after stent placement will be allowed as required. Stenting should be performed after intracranial thrombectomy unless specific technical circumstances suggest that access to the intracranial circulation requires anterograde stenting. Embolic protection devices should not be used routinely during ICA stent placement.
The following antiplatelet regimen should be used: For patients having received IV thrombolysis, immediate post-procedural oral or intrarectal single antiplatelet agents, (Aspirin 325mg PO or 650mg PR). A second agent (usually Clopidogrel 300mg PO) is added after follow-up brain imaging at 12-24 hours confirms absence of significant ICH. For patients having not been treated with IV thrombolysis, dual antiplatelet therapy (Aspirin 325mg PO or 650mg PR and Clopidogrel 300-600mg PO) is given immediately post-procedure. Routine use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, periprocedural IV Heparin is discouraged.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute ischemic anterior circulation stroke eligible for endovascular therapy according to local guidelines, with or without prior intravenous thrombolysis:
- Occlusion of the carotid terminus, M1 or M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery (MCA)
- A neurological deficit judged to be disabling by the patient and/or treating physician
- Any acute imaging judged by the treating physician to demonstrate salvageable brain tissue possibly amenable to EVT
- Groin puncture within 24-hours of onset or last known normal
- Tandem ipsilateral high-grade (≥70%) cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic etiology on initial non-invasive vascular imaging
- Informed consent from patient or surrogate or deferral of consent, according to local ethics policies
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing neurological impairment (modified Rankin score ≥3)
- Any underlying disease or condition making protocol adherence and/or 3-month follow-up unlikely
- Any known contra-indication to EVT, angioplasty/stenting, or antiplatelet therapy
- Tandem ipsilateral high-grade (≥70%) cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion NOT confirmed on conventional angiography
- Ipsilateral ICA stenosis or occlusion attributable to clinically or radiologically confirmed arterial dissection
- Isolated cervical carotid occlusion without intracranial occlusion
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)lead
- McGill Universitycollaborator
- Laval Universitycollaborator
- Queen's Universitycollaborator
- University of Ottawacollaborator
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
- University of Calgarycollaborator
- University of British Columbiacollaborator
- Dalhousie Universitycollaborator
- Health Sciences North Research Institutecollaborator
- University of Torontocollaborator
- University of Albertacollaborator
- Canadian Stroke Consortium (CSC)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0C1, Canada
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandre Y Poppe, MD CM
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2020
First Posted
February 7, 2020
Study Start
August 31, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
November 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- These data files will be made available to researchers with validated requests only after all major manuscripts (including secondary analysis papers) of the Trial are accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
- Access Criteria
- These data files will be made available to researchers with validated requests only after all major manuscripts (including secondary analysis papers) of the Trial are accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Upon completion of the EASI-TOC Trial, a public use database will be prepared by stripping any and all personal identifiers. The public use database, consisting of several data files, should contain: (1) baseline and demographic characteristics; (2) outcomes assessments; (3) imaging data; (4) serious adverse events. These data files will be made available to researchers with validated requests only after all major manuscripts (including secondary analysis papers) of the Trial are accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.