NCT04254926

Brief Summary

The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial is conducted. The study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva at 3 outpatient units.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
71

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 6, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 18, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 18, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

December 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

resource-basedself-esteemlife review intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Self-esteem

    Self-esteem will be measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE, 10 items) developed in 1965 (French version). Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 4. A score above 30 points corresponds to a high level of self-esteem, between 20 and 30 points indicates a moderate self-esteem, and a score of less than 20 points reflects a low self-esteem.

    Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Spiritual well-being

    Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months

  • Personal development

    Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months

  • Satisfaction with life

    Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months

  • The patient's perception of their interaction with the nurse

    Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months

Study Arms (2)

Revie ⊕ intervention early

EXPERIMENTAL

participants randomized into (i) the intervention group (IG) receive the Revie ⊕ intervention early on.

Behavioral: Revie ⊕

Revie ⊕ intervention later

EXPERIMENTAL

The control group (CG) receives the same intervention Revie ⊕ but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).

Behavioral: Revie ⊕

Interventions

Revie ⊕BEHAVIORAL

Revie ⊕ is a positive approach centered on the resources and strengths of the patient, and it consists of an intervention that focuses on the individual's life review. Revie ⊕ allows specialist nurses to discuss life events with cancer patients, to identify the significant elements, and to explore how the diagnosis has changed their values and preferences. The intervention is geared toward working with the patient to discover their potential, to identify their strategies for coping with the events of their life, and to thereby accompany them in achieving a better understanding of themselves and what defines their identity. The intervention also allows their concerns surrounding death to be addressed, in addition to providing clarity in regard to the life projects. In the end, as a conclusion to the intervention, the patient is provided a booklet recounting the salient features of their life review along with photographs, quotes, or images.

Revie ⊕ intervention earlyRevie ⊕ intervention later

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults 18 years with and advanced cancer,
  • whose general health status is adequate for participation in the study based on a clinical assessment by the nurse / doctor; and
  • who consent to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • documented cognitive impairment that compromises capacity for discernment,
  • command of French is insufficient for reading, writing, or conversing.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève

Geneva, 1200, Switzerland

Location

Haute école de santé

Geneva, 1206, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Pautex S, Zumstein-Shaha M. Revie plus sign in circle: An intervention promoting the dignity of individuals with advanced cancer: A feasibility study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;39:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

    PMID: 30850142BACKGROUND
  • Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Colin S, Shaha M, Pautex S. [The acceptability of the intervention Revie plus sign in circle : the nurses' perceptions and experiences]. Rech Soins Infirm. 2016 Dec;(127):55-70. doi: 10.3917/rsi.127.0055. French.

    PMID: 28186482BACKGROUND
  • Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Pautex S, Shaha M. Revie plus sign in circle: the influence of a life review intervention including a positive, patient-centered approach towards enhancing the personal dignity of patients with advanced cancer-a study protocol for a feasibility study using a mixed method investigation. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 19;2:63. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0101-z. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27965878BACKGROUND
  • Da Rocha Rodrigues G, Warne DW, Scuderi L, Lilla D, Stanic J, Pautex S. Revie plus sign in circle: Impact of a resource-based life review intervention on patients with advanced cancer: A waitlist controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Feb;68:102506. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102506. Epub 2024 Jan 6.

Study Officials

  • Sophie Pautex, Professor

    University Hospital, Geneva

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2019

First Posted

February 5, 2020

Study Start

April 6, 2019

Primary Completion

August 18, 2021

Study Completion

August 18, 2021

Last Updated

June 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

this has to be specified later

Locations