Patient-caregiver Communication Intervention for Prognostic Understanding
A Communication-based Intervention for Advanced Cancer Patient-caregiver Dyads to Increase Engagement in Advance Care Planning and Reduce Caregiver Burden
2 other identifiers
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to: (1) develop a communication-based intervention to improve advanced cancer patients' and caregivers' prognostic understanding using communication strategies (e.g., acknowledgment, validation of fears) and distress management techniques (e.g., deep breathing, muscle relaxation); (2) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention among advanced cancer patients and their caregivers; and (3) test the preliminary efficacy of the intervention on patients' and caregivers' prognostic understanding (primary outcome); completion of DNR order, living will, and health care proxy; psychological distress; communication quality; caregiver burden; and healthcare utilization (secondary outcomes).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 18, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2022
CompletedJanuary 31, 2023
July 1, 2022
9 months
February 5, 2019
June 22, 2022
January 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Prognostic Understanding
Change in prognostic understanding is assessed at baseline and post-intervention with two items on prognostic understanding: (1) Terminal illness acknowledgement with the item "How would you describe your current health status?" Answer choices include: 1) Relatively healthy, 2) relatively healthy but terminally ill, 3) seriously ill but not terminally ill, and 4) seriously ill and terminally ill, and (5) I don't know\]. Responses 2 and 4 are coded as accurate and responses 1, 3, and 5 are coded as inaccurate. (2) Life-expectancy \[Months, Years, and "I don't know"\]. Months are coded as accurate and years and I don't know are coded as inaccurate. Each variable is coded as 0=inaccurate or 1=accurate, for a total summary score range of 0 to 2. Differences between baseline and post-intervention assessments are calculated (possible range, -2 to +2) to determine changes in prognostic understanding.
Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to Post-intervention
Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
Baseline, follow-up (3 months)
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to Post-intervention
Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
Baseline, follow-up (3 months)
Change in Caregivers' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Van Scoy and Sudore Measure Which Adapts the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey, From Baseline to Post-Intervention
Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patient intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention arm contains the patients from this single arm study in which patients and caregivers will be given the experimental intervention (TAC intervention) with assessments pre and post intervention. The intervention will consist of six 45-minute telephone-delivered sessions. Session topics will include: (a) Distress management/tolerance (Sessions 1 and 2); (b) communication skills (Sessions 3 and 4); (c) guided review of prognostic information (Session 5); and (d) Intervention review and future plan (Session 6). Sessions will be completed by the individual (Sessions 1 and 3) and dyad (Sessions 2, and 4-6).
Caregiver (of patient) intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention arm contains the caregivers of patients from this single arm study in which patients and caregivers will be given the experimental intervention (TAC intervention) with assessments pre and post intervention. The intervention will consist of six 45-minute telephone-delivered sessions. Session topics will include: (a) Distress management/tolerance (Sessions 1 and 2); (b) communication skills (Sessions 3 and 4); (c) guided review of prognostic information (Session 5); and (d) Intervention review and future plan (Session 6). Sessions will be completed by the individual (Sessions 1 and 3) and dyad (Sessions 2, and 4-6).
Interventions
The TAC intervention is a six session intervention designed to teach the techniques of distress tolerance and communication skills in order to assist patients and their caregivers in discussing the patients' prognoses.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of poor prognosis advanced cancer defined as locally advanced or metastatic cancer (e.g., pancreaticobiliary, esophagogastric, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung, or gynecological cancer) and/or disease progression following at least first line chemotherapy.
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Identification of an informal caregiver
- Oncologist reported discussion of prognosis with the patient and/or caregiver.
You may not qualify if:
- Not fluent in English
- Severely cognitively impaired (as measured by Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire scores of \< 6)
- Too ill or weak to complete the interviews (as judged by the interviewer)
- Currently receiving palliative care/hospice at the time of enrollment
- Children and young adults under age 18
- Deemed inappropriate for the study by their treating oncologist.
- In addition, patient-caregiver dyads in which both members have an accurate understanding of prognosis (terminal status and life-expectancy) will be excluded due to the lack of need for an intervention.
- The person (family member or friend) whom the patient indicates provides their informal (unpaid) care
- English speaking
- Able to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, 10065, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The statistical analysis plan (and associated statistical power) was based on an expected sample size of 30 evaluable dyads. Due to COVID-19 and restrictions around data collection, only 14 dyads were consented and 8 dyads were evaluable (with n=9 patients, n=8 caregivers). This reduced sample size was not sufficient for the statistical analysis plan as written, and, therefore, only descriptive statistics for the response proportions can be presented for the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Megan Shen
- Organization
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Megan J Shen, PhD
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2019
First Posted
February 7, 2019
Study Start
September 20, 2020
Primary Completion
June 17, 2021
Study Completion
January 18, 2022
Last Updated
January 31, 2023
Results First Posted
August 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share