NCT03833817

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to: (1) develop a communication-based intervention to improve advanced cancer patients' and caregivers' prognostic understanding using communication strategies (e.g., acknowledgment, validation of fears) and distress management techniques (e.g., deep breathing, muscle relaxation); (2) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention among advanced cancer patients and their caregivers; and (3) test the preliminary efficacy of the intervention on patients' and caregivers' prognostic understanding (primary outcome); completion of DNR order, living will, and health care proxy; psychological distress; communication quality; caregiver burden; and healthcare utilization (secondary outcomes).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 7, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 20, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 17, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 18, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 18, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 5, 2019

Results QC Date

June 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

advance care planningprognostic understandingcommunication

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Prognostic Understanding

    Change in prognostic understanding is assessed at baseline and post-intervention with two items on prognostic understanding: (1) Terminal illness acknowledgement with the item "How would you describe your current health status?" Answer choices include: 1) Relatively healthy, 2) relatively healthy but terminally ill, 3) seriously ill but not terminally ill, and 4) seriously ill and terminally ill, and (5) I don't know\]. Responses 2 and 4 are coded as accurate and responses 1, 3, and 5 are coded as inaccurate. (2) Life-expectancy \[Months, Years, and "I don't know"\]. Months are coded as accurate and years and I don't know are coded as inaccurate. Each variable is coded as 0=inaccurate or 1=accurate, for a total summary score range of 0 to 2. Differences between baseline and post-intervention assessments are calculated (possible range, -2 to +2) to determine changes in prognostic understanding.

    Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to Post-intervention

    Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)

  • Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up

    Baseline, follow-up (3 months)

  • Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to Post-intervention

    Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)

  • Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up

    Baseline, follow-up (3 months)

  • Change in Caregivers' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Van Scoy and Sudore Measure Which Adapts the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey, From Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Baseline, post-intervention (within 30 days)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Patient intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This intervention arm contains the patients from this single arm study in which patients and caregivers will be given the experimental intervention (TAC intervention) with assessments pre and post intervention. The intervention will consist of six 45-minute telephone-delivered sessions. Session topics will include: (a) Distress management/tolerance (Sessions 1 and 2); (b) communication skills (Sessions 3 and 4); (c) guided review of prognostic information (Session 5); and (d) Intervention review and future plan (Session 6). Sessions will be completed by the individual (Sessions 1 and 3) and dyad (Sessions 2, and 4-6).

Behavioral: Talking about Cancer (TAC)

Caregiver (of patient) intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This intervention arm contains the caregivers of patients from this single arm study in which patients and caregivers will be given the experimental intervention (TAC intervention) with assessments pre and post intervention. The intervention will consist of six 45-minute telephone-delivered sessions. Session topics will include: (a) Distress management/tolerance (Sessions 1 and 2); (b) communication skills (Sessions 3 and 4); (c) guided review of prognostic information (Session 5); and (d) Intervention review and future plan (Session 6). Sessions will be completed by the individual (Sessions 1 and 3) and dyad (Sessions 2, and 4-6).

Behavioral: Talking about Cancer (TAC)

Interventions

The TAC intervention is a six session intervention designed to teach the techniques of distress tolerance and communication skills in order to assist patients and their caregivers in discussing the patients' prognoses.

Caregiver (of patient) intervention armPatient intervention arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of poor prognosis advanced cancer defined as locally advanced or metastatic cancer (e.g., pancreaticobiliary, esophagogastric, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung, or gynecological cancer) and/or disease progression following at least first line chemotherapy.
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Identification of an informal caregiver
  • Oncologist reported discussion of prognosis with the patient and/or caregiver.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not fluent in English
  • Severely cognitively impaired (as measured by Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire scores of \< 6)
  • Too ill or weak to complete the interviews (as judged by the interviewer)
  • Currently receiving palliative care/hospice at the time of enrollment
  • Children and young adults under age 18
  • Deemed inappropriate for the study by their treating oncologist.
  • In addition, patient-caregiver dyads in which both members have an accurate understanding of prognosis (terminal status and life-expectancy) will be excluded due to the lack of need for an intervention.
  • The person (family member or friend) whom the patient indicates provides their informal (unpaid) care
  • English speaking
  • Able to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, 10065, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Communication

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Limitations and Caveats

The statistical analysis plan (and associated statistical power) was based on an expected sample size of 30 evaluable dyads. Due to COVID-19 and restrictions around data collection, only 14 dyads were consented and 8 dyads were evaluable (with n=9 patients, n=8 caregivers). This reduced sample size was not sufficient for the statistical analysis plan as written, and, therefore, only descriptive statistics for the response proportions can be presented for the study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Megan Shen
Organization
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Study Officials

  • Megan J Shen, PhD

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restriction Type
LTE60

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2019

First Posted

February 7, 2019

Study Start

September 20, 2020

Primary Completion

June 17, 2021

Study Completion

January 18, 2022

Last Updated

January 31, 2023

Results First Posted

August 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations