Efficacy and Safety of Precut-EMR for Resecting of Colonic Polyp
Comparison Between EMR and Precut-EMR for Colorectal Polyp; Randomized Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was attempted to determine the efficacy and complication of precut EMR comparing with convetional EMR for resecting of 10 \~ 20 mm colon polyp through prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.1 years
February 1, 2020
February 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Histologic complete resection rate
baseline ( enrollment of all planned patient)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Procedure time
procedure
Complication such as perforation, bleeding
baseline ( enrollment of all planned patient)
Study Arms (2)
Precut-EMR
EXPERIMENTALFor treating of 10\~20mm colon polyp, patient will be randomly divided into two groups, a Precut-EMR group and a EMR group. In Precut-EMR, endoscopist submucosally inject with saline around a polyp. Subsequently, circumferential incision/precutting was made with the tip of the snare around 2 mm outside the tumor. After that, the snare was positioned in the cut groove and tightend, and the tumor was resected using electrical current.
Conventional EMR
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor treating of 10\~20mm colon polyp, patient will be randomly divided into two groups, a Precut-EMR group and a EMR group. Conventional EMR had been widely used technique. Endoscopist submucosally inject with saline around a polyp. After that, snare is positioned around a polyp, and polyp was resected using electrical current
Interventions
For treating of 10\~20mm colon polyp, patient will be randomly divided into two groups, a Precut-EMR group and a EMR group. In Precut-EMR, endoscopist submucosally inject with saline around a polyp. Subsequently, circumferential incision/precutting was made with the tip of the snare around 2 mm outside the tumor. After that, the snare was positioned in the cut groove and tightend, and the tumor was resected using electrical current.
EMR had been widely used technique. Endoscopist submucosally inject with saline around a polyp. After that, snare is positioned around a polyp, and polyp was resected using electrical current.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients older than 20 years old who had 10\~20 mm colon polyp and agreed to participate a research
You may not qualify if:
- Medication history of antiplatelet agent within a week of procedure.
- Medical history of coagulopathy
- More than American Society of Anesthesiology class III
- Medical history of liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, severe inflammatory disease.
- pedunculated polyp and polyp with malignant potential.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, Songpa-Gu, 05505, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Dong-hoon Yang
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share