NCT02581475

Brief Summary

Segmental examination twice of the proximal colon might be helpful to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
386

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 19, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 19, 2015

Results QC Date

May 27, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Adenoma detection rateColonoscopyWithdrawal time

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference of Adenoma Detection Rate in the Proximal Colon Among 2 Group.

    Adenoma detection rate in the proximal colon was the proportion of participants wiht more than one adenomas in proximal colon.

    During routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy, for up to 1 hour, number of adenomas was recorded. About 1 month after this study, adenoma detetion rates were calculated.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Withdrawal Time in the Proximal Colon Among 2 Group.

    During routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy, for up to 1 hour, withdrawal time was recorded. About 1 month after this study, mean withdrawal time was calculated.

  • Duration of the Total Colonoscopy Among 2 Group.

    During routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy, for up to 1 hour, the duration of colonoscopy was recorded. About 1 month after this study, mean duration of the colonoscopy was calculated.

  • Adenomas Per Patient in the Proximal Colon Among 2 Group.

    During routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy, for up toafter 1 hour, the number of adenomas was recorded. About 1 month after this study, mean number of adenomas in proximal colon was calculated.

Study Arms (2)

Group A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Extending withdrawal time in the proximal colon: After cecal intubation, the colonoscopy is withdrawn to the hepatic flexure and then to the splenic flexure with an extended withdrawal time during colonoscopy. From cecum to hepatic flexure, 1.5-2 min is required and 2.5-3 min is required from heptic flexure to splenic flexure.

Procedure: Extending withdrawal time in the proximal colon

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

Segmental examination twice of the proximal colon: After cecal intubation, the colonoscopy is withdrawn to the hepatic flexure and then the colonoscopy is intubated to the cecum again. The same procedure is performed in the colonic segment from hepatic flexure to splenic flexure. The withdrawal time in each colonic segment is similar to the group A.

Procedure: Segmental examination twice of the proximal colon

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score ≥2, such as patients ≥ 50 years, patients with a family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative or male patients with current or past smoking.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with prior resection of the proximal colon, advanced colonic cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or polyposis syndrome.
  • The cecum could not be intubated.
  • Inadequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score \<2 in any segment of the colon).
  • Biopsies were not available.
  • Unable to provide informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Jiang R, Ahnen DJ, Bond JH, Church TR, Robertson DJ, Smith-Warner SA, Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Greenberg ER. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):832-41. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.007. Epub 2008 Dec 9.

    PMID: 19171141BACKGROUND
  • Butterly L, Robinson CM, Anderson JC, Weiss JE, Goodrich M, Onega TL, Amos CI, Beach ML. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;109(3):417-26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.442. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

    PMID: 24394752BACKGROUND
  • Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P, Sautereau D, Boustiere C, Grimaud JC, Barthelemy C, See J, Serraj I, D'Halluin PN, Branger B, Ponchon T. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):284-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995618.

    PMID: 18389446BACKGROUND
  • Guo CG, Zhang F, Ji R, Li Y, Li L, Zuo XL, Li YQ. Efficacy of segmental re-examination of proximal colon for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):243-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122013. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal PolypsPolypsPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Yanqing Li
Organization
Shandong University Qilu Hospital

Study Officials

  • Yanqing Li, PhD, MD

    Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2015

First Posted

October 21, 2015

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 19, 2016

Results First Posted

October 19, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations