Study Stopped
Study impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic: * slow recruitment rate * budget constrains
RENOVATE Fibrosis:HFNC Versus NIPPV in Acute Respiratory Failure in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis
Fibrosis
Multicentric Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Comparing High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus NonInvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis (RENOVATE Fibrosis)
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
6
Brief Summary
A pilot multicentric randomized controlled study investigating the feasibility of recruiting 50 pulmonary fibrosis patients in acute respiratory failure within18 months. Additionally, exploratory efficacy and safety outcomes will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 9, 2021
CompletedAugust 16, 2021
August 1, 2021
8 months
January 31, 2020
August 9, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recruitment feasibility
Recruitment of 50 pulmonary fibrosis patients in acute respiratory failure in 18 months
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Dyspneia variation (Borg scale)
7 days
Respiratory frequency variation
7 days
oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) variation
7 days
Carbon dioxide arterial partial pressure (PaCO2) variation
7 days
Other Outcomes (4)
Comfort visual analog scale variation
7 days
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) rate
7 days
Mortality
28 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe HFNC (Airvo2 Fisher \& Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) consists of an apparatus that allows adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100% and delivers flow up to 60 L/ min.
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)
ACTIVE COMPARATORNIPPV will be performed using the devices available on centers. Both a dedicated NIPPV device or an invasive mechanical ventilator with NIPPV mode are accepted. The interface should be an oronasal or full face mask.
Interventions
HFNC will be delivered through AIRVO2. FiO2 from 21 to 100% and heated humidified gas flow up to 60 l / min with temperature of the circuit maintained at 37 degrees. Oxygen flow will be offered through a humidified nasal catheter. Flow and FiO2 will be titrated according to the protocol to maximize the patient´s comfort and SpO2
NIPPV will be performed using a facial mask (either oronasal or full face). NIPPV will deliver pressures and FiO2 according to the protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A. Pulmonary fibrosis will be defined by all of the criteria below:
- presence of Velcro-type crackles on physical examination
- imaging compatible with pulmonary fibrosis
- diffuse disease on imaging
- B. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) will be defined by hypoxemia evidenced by SpO2 \<90% or PaO2 \<60 mmHg in room air and at least two of the criteria below within the last four weeks:
- worsening dyspnea
- worsening breathing effort
- worsening gas exchange (worsening SpO2 or paO2)
- worsening respiratory rate, above 25 irpm
You may not qualify if:
- Pulmonary fibrosis secondary to progressive massive fibrosis (silicosis), or any other tumor form of fibrosis;
- Significant pulmonary arterial hypertension characterized by: Right ventricular failure on Doppler echocardiogram or Cardiac index \<2L / min / m2 in catheterization of right chambers;
- Pneumothorax or extensive pleural effusion as the main determinant of ARF in the assessment of the attending physician;
- Cardiogenic pulmonary congestion as the main determinant of IRPA in the assessment of the attending physician;
- Presence of delirium or non-cooperation at the time of randomization;
- Anatomical facial abnormalities;
- Incoercible vomiting or hypersecretion of the airways;
- Use of continuous VNIPP or HFNC for more than 8h before randomization;
- pregnancy;
- Refusal to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital do Coracaolead
- Ministry of Health, Brazilcollaborator
- Fisher and Paykel Healthcarecollaborator
Study Sites (6)
Hospital UNIMED Vitória
Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
Hospital de Brasilia (HOBRA)
Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
Hospital Nereu Ramos
Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Instituto de Cardiologia Dante Pazanese
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Hospital do Coracao
São Paulo, Brazil
InCor - Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
São Paulo, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leticia Kawano-Dourado, MD
Hospital do Coração
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Israel Maia, MD
Hospital do Coração
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
December 10, 2020
Primary Completion
August 9, 2021
Study Completion
August 9, 2021
Last Updated
August 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- In 8 months
- Access Criteria
- Publication
Data sharing plan - under construction