NCT04244929

Brief Summary

Prospective, multicenter study on the Total Knee Prosthesis available on the market "Persona Medial Congruent® knee". Primary endpoint

  • Evaluation of the survival of the implant after 5 years of follow-up Secondary endpoints
  • Evaluation of the survival of the implant at 10 years of follow up.
  • Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes in Italian patients undergoing total knee replacement with the Persona Medial Congruent® implant with sacrifice or retention of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 20, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 28, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 20, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the safety based on implant survivorship at 5 years follow up

    Implant survival will be evaluated by radiographic parameters on standard and long leg standing radiographs that indicate prosthesis mobilization (radiolucency lines, fracture, osteolysis)

    72 months

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Evaluate the safety based on implant survivorship at 10 years follow up

    132 months

  • Evaluation of pain

    132 months

  • Evaluation of medication taken by the patient

    132 months

  • Evaluation of muscle strength

    132 months

  • Return to work

    132 months

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PCL removal

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will undergo surgery by sacrificing the PCL

Procedure: Total knee arthroplastyDevice: Persona Medial Congruent Knee Prosthesis implantation with Posterior Cruciate Ligament sacrifice

PCL preservation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will undergo surgery with retaining the PCL

Procedure: Total knee arthroplastyDevice: Persona Medial Congruent Knee Prosthesis implantation with Posterior Cruciate Ligament retaining

Interventions

Patients will be implanted with this medial pivoting knee prosthesis. Posterior Cruciate Ligament will be retained

PCL preservation

Total knee arthroplasty using standard anterior approach.

PCL preservationPCL removal

Patients will be implanted with this medial pivoting knee prosthesis. Posterior Cruciate Ligament will be sacrificed

PCL removal

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient qualifies for a primary total knee arthroplasty based on physical exam and medical history, including diagnosis of severe knee pain and disability due to at least one of the following:
  • Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis
  • Collagen disorders and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle
  • Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy
  • Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities
  • The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts that did not include partial or total knee arthroplasty of the ipsilateral knee
  • Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled study procedures and follow-up evaluations
  • Independent of study participation, patient is a candidate for commercially available Persona MC knee implants. Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the Informed Consent.
  • Patient has participated in the Informed Consent process and has signed the Ethics Committee approved 'Informed Consent'.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is currently participating in any other surgical intervention studies or pain management studies
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to give consent or to comply with the follow-up program.
  • Previous history of infection in the affected joint and/or other local/systemic infection that may affect the prosthetic joint
  • Insufficient bone stock on femoral or tibial surfaces
  • Skeletal immaturity
  • Neuropathic arthropathy
  • Osteoporosis or any loss of musculature or neuromuscular disease that compromises the affected limb
  • Stable, painless arthrodesis in a satisfactory functional position
  • Severe instability secondary to the absence of collateral ligament integrity
  • Rheumatoid arthritis accompanied by an ulcer of the skin or a history of recurrent breakdown of the skin
  • Patient has a known or suspected sensitivity or allergy to one or more of the implant materials

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, 40136, Italy

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Sabatini L, Risitano S, Parisi G, Tosto F, Indelli PF, Atzori F, Masse A. Medial Pivot in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Literature Review and Our First Experience. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 4;11:1179544117751431. doi: 10.1177/1179544117751431. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29326531BACKGROUND
  • Van Overschelde PP, Fitch DA. Patient satisfaction at 2 months following total knee replacement using a second generation medial-pivot system: follow-up of 250 consecutive cases. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Sep;4(18):339. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.41.

    PMID: 27761443BACKGROUND
  • Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.

  • Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):96-100. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34152.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prosthesis Failure

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Study Officials

  • Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, MD, PhD

    IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The Co-Investigator who assesses the outcomes will be blind to the treatment group's allocation
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Prospective, two arms, multicenter study that aims to involve up to 10 hospitals in Italy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2020

First Posted

January 28, 2020

Study Start

December 20, 2019

Primary Completion

December 20, 2020

Study Completion

March 1, 2021

Last Updated

May 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations