Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Hybrid Ceramic Versus E-Max Superstructures
Esthetic Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Crystal Ultra Hybrid Ceramic Compared to E-Max Superstructures in Esthetic Zone
1 other identifier
interventional
22
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In patients receiving implants in the esthetic zone, would the use of new Nano hybrid ceramic crown material (Crystal Ultra) improve esthetic patient satisfaction and peri-implant tissue success when compared with Lithium Disilicate crown (E-max)?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 21, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.2 years
October 18, 2016
October 19, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Esthetic Patient satisfaction
Measurement unit is Binary
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Peri-implant tissue success (A-Marginal Bone Loss, B-Relative attachment level, C-Peri-Implant Probing depth, D-Sulcus bleeding)
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplant superstructure crown: All ceramic, IPS Emax
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALImplant superstructure crown: Hybrid ceramic, crystal Ultra crown
Interventions
Crystal Ultra: is a resin nano-ceramic material, that combines both advantages of ceramics and composites.
IPS Emax: is an all ceramic crown that has proven superior aesthetics and strength properties.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age above 18 years with at least one tooth missing in the esthetic area.
- Available bone for implant placement:
- A. Labial and Palatal Plate of bone not less than 2mm. B. Mesio- distal dimension not less than 6.5mm. C. Bone length not less than 9mm.
- Patient with good oral hygiene.
- Class 1 occlusion.
- Lack of excessive parafunctional activity leading to implant failure.
- Tooth extracted not less than 6 month.
You may not qualify if:
- Young patients in whom the jaws are still growing. (Less than 18 years).
- Jaw pathology.
- Smokers.
- Uncontrolled Diabetic or particularly insulin-dependent.
- Radiotherapy to the neck or face.
- Multiple loss of teeth which may be indicated for more complicated procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jylian El Guindy, Professor
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer Assistance
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2016
First Posted
October 21, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share