Effects of Internet-based ERITA Added to TAU in Young People With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (TEENS) Feasibility Trial
Treatment Effects of Internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) Added to Treatment as Usual in Young People With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury - (TEENS) Feasibility Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There has been a significant increase in non-suicidal self-injury the last decades especially among young people and treatment initiative are sparse. We aim to assess the feasibility of methods, procedures, and safety of internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) as add on to treatment as usual (TAU) in 13-17-year-old patients with non-suicidal self-injury referred to psychiatric services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 22, 2021
CompletedMay 24, 2021
May 1, 2021
9 months
January 16, 2020
May 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Completion of follow-up
Completion of follow-up will be defined as completing at least one clinical outcome (non-suicidal self-injury events) at end of intervention. If the number participants with completed outcomes is 26 out of 30, the fraction will be 87%, 95% CI 75% to 99%. A follow-up fraction of 87% or more will be acceptable for a future trial while a fraction below 75% will impose serious problems of interpreting the trial result in a future large pragmatic trial.
End of treatment at 12 weeks
The fraction of eligible participants who consent to inclusion and randomization
We will determine the fraction of potential participants as the number of eligible persons compared to the number of randomized persons. If the number of participants randomized out of the number of eligible persons is 30 out of 75, the fraction will be 40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) will be: 29% to 51%. A randomization fraction of 29% or more will be acceptable for a future trial, while a fraction below 29% will impose serious problems of recruitment for a future large pragmatic trial.
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Compliance
Compliance with the experimental intervention will be defined as completing at least six of 12 ERITA sessions. ERITA will automatically register time for login and save the exercises that have been completed. If the number of compliant experimental participants is 11 out of 15, the fraction will be 73%, 95% CI 51% to 96%. A compliance fraction of 51% or more will be acceptable for a future trial while a fraction below 51% will impose serious problems of interpreting the trial result in a future large pragmatic trial.
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Non-suicidal self-injury as explorative primary clinical outcome
Non-suicidal self-injury, assessed at baseline and end of therapy (12 weeks) by blinded outcome assessment by phone with Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI-Y)
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quality of life as explorative secondary clinical outcomes
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress as explorative secondary clinical outcomes
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Non-suicidal self-injury as dichotomous variables as explorative secondary clinical outcome
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Number of sick days the last month as explorative secondary clinical outcome
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Other Outcomes (8)
Difficulties in emotion regulation as further explorative clinical outcome
At end of treatment and once a week for 12 weeks
Indirect self-destructive behaviours as further explorative clinical outcome
End of treatment at 12 weeks
Suicidal ideations, plans and actions as further explorative clinical outcome
End of treatment at 12 weeks
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Internet-based ERITA-DK
EXPERIMENTALERITA is a youth-adapted version of Emotion Regulation Group Therapy (ERGT), based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), which encounters emotional recognition and regulation, crisis strategies and skills training. The ERITA intervention is provided as add-on to TAU and consists of 12 weeks, manualized, therapist guided internet-based therapy. The intervention also provides six modules for the parents focusing on NSSI and other risk-taking behaviors, emotional awareness, and validation skills. The participants must complete one module every week while the parents must complete a module every second week. A mobile app is available to complement the online treatment. The app includes reminders of homework and skills and allows to report on both self-destructive behaviors and impulses daily.
Treatment as Usual (TAU)
ACTIVE COMPARATORChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) offer specialized treatment for children and adolescents. TAU encounters a variety of clinical treatment and assessment offers, representing a highly inhomogeneous group of treatments, for instance: Pharmacological treatment, Family-Based Treatment (FBT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, supportive counselling and psychoeducation. Throughout the trial course the treatment responsibility is handled by clinicians providing TAU.
Interventions
Please see description of experimental arm (arm one)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 5 non-suicidal self-injury episodes in the past year and ≥ 1 non-suicidal self-injury episodes in the past month (DSM-5 criteria for a diagnosis of non-suicidal self-injury disorder in terms of frequency of NSSI).
- Age-appropriate literacy.
- Having at least one parent committing to participate in the parent program.
- Informed consent from parents/legal caretakers.
You may not qualify if:
- Imminent suicidal risk assessed by clinicians during routine screening procedure (rated as no risk, elevated risk, imminent risk) in need of admission or other life saving strategies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Team for Self-injury, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, B195
Copenhagen, Ø, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Olsen MH, Morthorst B, Pagsberg AK, Heinrichsen M, Mohl B, Rubaek L, Bjureberg J, Simonsson O, Lindschou J, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2021 Jul 16;22(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2.
PMID: 34271984DERIVEDWitt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 7;3(3):CD013667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013667.pub2.
PMID: 33677832DERIVEDMorthorst B, Rubaek L, Lindschou J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Bjureberg J, Hellner C, Mohl B, Pagsberg AK. An internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for nonsuicidal self-injury in adolescents: study protocol for a feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Feb 6;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00785-4.
PMID: 33549128DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anne Katrine Pagsberg, Professor
Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services Capital Region of Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the intervention, a blinding of participants and therapists (intervention providers) is not possible. Blinded outcome assessment and data management will be performed. Statistical analyses will be performed by two blinded statisticians presenting independent reports. Based on the two blinded conclusions, two abstracts will be written and published (on a website).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2020
First Posted
January 28, 2020
Study Start
May 11, 2020
Primary Completion
January 22, 2021
Study Completion
January 22, 2021
Last Updated
May 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share