Effect of Lubricity of Food Gels on Satiation and Satiety
The Effects of Hydrogels Differing in Their Lubricity on Appetite Control, Satiety, Subsequent Food Intake and Salivary Biomarkers
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main aim of the study is to elucidate the influence of fibre-based hydrogels differing in their mechanical properties (characterized both instrumentally and sensorially) in terms of low/ high lubricity on satiety, satiation and salivary biomarkers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2020
CompletedAugust 14, 2020
August 1, 2020
5 months
January 15, 2020
August 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Baseline level and change in hunger ratings
A questionnaire assessing perceived hunger is completed at specific times points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks : "How hungry do you feel right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min hunger) and 100 is (max hunger).
-5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
Baseline level and change in fullness ratings
A questionnaire assessing perceived fullness is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How full do you feel right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min fullness) and 100 is (max fullness).
-5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
Baseline level and change in desire to eat ratings
A questionnaire assessing perceived desire to eat is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How strong is your desire to eat right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min desire to eat) and 100 is (max desire to eat)
-5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
Baseline level and change in prospective food consumption ratings
A questionnaire assessing perceived prospective food consumption is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How much food do you think you could eat right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min prospective food consumption) and 100 is (max prospective food consumption).
-5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
Baseline level and change in thirst ratings
A questionnaire assessing perceived thirst is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How thirsty do you feel right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min thirst) and 100 is (max thirst).
-5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
Energy Intake
The participants are provided with an ad libitum lunch of rice and vegetables, strawberry yogurt water. The amount of lunch is provided (in grams) and is weighted prior to consumption and any remains are re-weighted after consumption. Energy consumed will be calculated.
20 minutes after the preload
Baseline level and change in salivary properties
Saliva is collected on three time points on each visit. Salivary protein, amylase, mucin and statherin will be analysed and salivary lubricity will be mesaured
90 minutes, 150 minutes, 170 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Palatibility of the preloads
Immediately after eating the preload
Study Arms (3)
Low lubricity (LL) hydrogels containing fibre-based beads
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are given a preload of 30 g of low lubricity hydrogels (alginate beads in kappa-carrageenan hydrogels) after 2.5 hours after a standardized breakfast. After 30 minutes of the preload, participants are given ad libitum lunch. They are asked to eat "as much or as little as they want, until they feel comfortably full".
High lubricity (HL) hydrogels containing no fibre-based beads
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants are given a preload of 30 g of high lubricity hydrogels (no beads in kappa-carrageenan and alginate mixed hydrogels) after 2.5 hours after a standardized breakfast. After 30 minutes of the preload, participants are given ad libitum lunch. They are asked to eat "as much or as little as they want, until they feel comfortably full".
Water
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe water containing the same watermelon flavor, color and sweetness was given as control to match the gels. Participants receive the same amount of water like hydrogels - 30 g after 2.5 hours after a standardized breakfast. After 30 minutes of the preload, participants are given ad libitum lunch. They are asked to eat "as much or as little as they want, until they feel comfortably full".
Interventions
The preload is made from kappa-carrageenan and alginate beads of 450 μm size. It contains no additional macronutrient but has food-grade watermelon flavor, color, and non-nutritive sweetener.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- With a normal weight (BMI=18.5 - 24.99 kg/m²)
- Generally healthy
You may not qualify if:
- A smoker
- Having oral infections/diseases/problems in chewing and swallowing
- Anyone with a chronic or acute health condition that may affect the ability to sense, eat, digest or absorb food
- Anyone currently using prescribed or non-prescribed medication that may interfere with the ability to sense, eat, digest or absorb food
- Anyone who is pregnant or lactating
- Anyone with a food allergy or intolerance
- Anyone who are on a special diet or are taking protein/fiber supplements
- Anyone who cannot tolerate food gels
- Underweight (BMI \<18.5 kg/m²) or overweight (25 - 29.99 kg/m²) or obese (BMI=\>29.99 kg/m²)
- Suffer from any blood borne disease e.g. HIV, Hep B
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Leeds
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2020
First Posted
January 27, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Last Updated
August 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share