A Clinical Trial of Caterna Virtual Reality Facilitating Treatment in Children With Amblyopia
VRTA
A Phase 3 Randomized, Single-blind, Multicenter, Clinical Control Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Caterna Virtual Reality Facilitating Treatment Patients With Amblyopia in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
4
Brief Summary
It aims to find the effectiveness and the safety of Virtual Reality (Caterna, DOBOSO, item code: SJ-VRS2018) to facilitate amblyopia treatment combining spectacles and occlusion. And it also aims to test whether amblyopia treatment outcomes with spectacles, occlusion and VR are significant better than those without VR, but with spectacles and occlusion. The experiment arm is designed to use the Caterna VR to treat amblyopia for total consistent 13 weeks, 3 times per week, while the control arm is not. Both arms are best optical correction and with patch the non-amblyopia eye 2 hours or 6 hours per day. All eyes are followed up for total 13 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.3 years
January 18, 2020
February 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness of amblyopia treatment with VR
General Effectiveness=Number of both cured eyes and effective eyes from total number×100%
13 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Effectiveness of 8 weeks' VR amblyopia treatment
8 weeks
Effectiveness of 4 weeks' VR amblyopia treatment
4 weeks
Stereopsis: distance and near, respectively
13 weeks
Contrast sensitivity function(CSF)
13 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Severe Adverse Event Number
13 weeks
Study Arms (2)
VR treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe arm will use the virtual reality headset reproduces dynamic video content with perceptual learning and binocular perception (including stereopsis) that is visually perceived a little bit faster, brighter, and higher contrast to the amblyopia eyes . The each VR therapy length is 30 minutes with 5 minute break after 15 minutes' therapy sequence, 3 times per week, total 13 weeks. All amblyopia eyes are best optical correction or combining patching non-amblyopia eyes if there're more than 2 lines difference best corrected vision acuity.
control
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis arm of amblyopia eyes are all best optical correction or combining patching non-amblyopia eyes if there're more than 2 lines difference best corrected vision acuity. No VR therapy.
Interventions
Vivid interactive games of perceptual learning content, with artificial intelligent sound and scores to feedback vision and actions results, which can be connected to the supervision of cellphone software"Wechat" to upload vision acuity and choose 2 eyes' video output automaticly.
Each eye has best corrected vision spectacles with best corrected optical lens.
2 hours patch to the non-amblyopia eye if the other amblyopia eye is mild or moderate amblyopia; 6 hours patch to the non-amblyopia eye if the other amblyopia eye is severe abmlyopia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages from 4\~12 years old (including 4 years or 12 years old);
- According to the Chinese Medical Association Ophthalmology branch: Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology Experts "Consensus of Amblyopia Diagnosis " (2011) as the standard to be diagnosed as amblyopia with abnormal vision than that of age-based norms, that is, caused by abnormal visual development due to strabismus, uncorrected refractive error or form deprivation, the best corrected vision acuity of single eye or both eyes below age-based norms; Or 2 eyes' vision acuity difference larger than 2 lines or more. The normal minimum limit of vision acuity for children of different ages are as the followings: The normal minimum limit of vision acuity for children aged 4 to 5 years is 0.5 (decimal vision acuity); And the normal minimum limit of vision acuity for children aged 6 and over is 0.7(decimal vision acuity).
- The subject's supervision is fully understand the purpose of the trial and sign an informed consent form; And the subject can cooperate with the whole treatment and related eye examinations。 -
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects suffered from tumors, heart disease, hypertension (blood pressure top limitation of children aged 4 to 6 years: 110/70 mmHg, blood pressure top limitation of children aged 7 to 12 years: 120/80 mmHg), or epilepsy;
- The subject has implanted electronic devices, such as pacemakers, etc.
- The subject had or has a mental illness;
- Any eye of the subject due to keratitis, conjunctivitis, internal turning eyelashes and other diseases leading to photophobia or continuing tears;
- Subject suffered from vertigo, acrophobia or traumatic brain lesions;
- The subject's eye has congenital glaucoma, congenital ptosis, dacryocystitis, trauma and other significant vision related lesions;
- Subject received a masking therapy or a treatment instrument for amblyopia treatment before joining this study;
- The subject participated in other clinical trials before joining this study;
- For safety reasons or for the benefit of patients, the researchers believe that the patient should not participate in other conditions, such as suffering from a certain severe heart, liver or kidney disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
the first affiliated hospital of Beijing University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100045, China
Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software Co., Ltd.
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Zhongshan Ophthalmic center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guanzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China
Related Publications (6)
Repka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cotter SA, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Moke PS, Quinn GE, Scheiman MM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May;121(5):603-11. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.603.
PMID: 12742836RESULTHolmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Repka MX, Scheiman MM, Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2075-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.001.
PMID: 14597512RESULTScheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW, Edwards AR, Birch E, Cotter SA, Crouch ER Jr, Cruz OA, Davitt BV, Donahue S, Holmes JM, Lyon DW, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Suh DW, Tamkins SM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):437-47. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.4.437.
PMID: 15824215RESULTYazdani N, Sadeghi R, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Zarifmahmoudi L, Ehsaei A, Barrett BT. Part-time versus full-time occlusion therapy for treatment of amblyopia: A meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 6;29(2):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.01.006. eCollection 2017 Jun.
PMID: 28626815RESULTJin H, Yi JL, Xie H, Xiao F, Wang WJ, Shu XM, Xu YL, Chen SL, Ye WX. [A study on visual development among preschool children]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;47(12):1102-6. Chinese.
PMID: 22336120RESULTHe MG. [The quality of epidemiological research on pediatric refractive error and amblyopia in China needs to be improved]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 11;53(1):3-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.01.002. Chinese.
PMID: 28162193RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xiaohong Liu
Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software
- STUDY CHAIR
Mosheng Zhou
Guangzhou Shijing Medical Software
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Research centers are used as a stratification factor. The researchers include subjects in the trial group or control group based on randomized envelopes.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2020
First Posted
January 23, 2020
Study Start
September 4, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share