Comparison of the Effects of TENS and CTM on Primary Dysmenorrhea
Comparison of the Effects of High-frequency TENS and Connective Tissue Manipulation on the Primary Dysmenorrhea
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
this study was to compare the early and short-term effects of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus connective tissue manipulation (CTM) in participants with primary dysmenorrhea. Half of the participants received CTM, while the other half received TENS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2020
CompletedJanuary 22, 2020
January 1, 2020
7 months
January 13, 2020
January 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of Pain Severity
To determine the localization of pain, the participants were asked to point out and mark the place(s) they felt the most pain on a body diagram. The severity of the pain of dysmenorrhea was assessed on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Change from Pain severity at 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Assessment of Sleep Disorders and Fatigue
Change from Sleep Disorders and Fatigue severity at 3 months
Assessment of Depressive Symptoms
Change from Beck Depression Inventory score at 3 months
Assessment of Anxiety
Change from Beck Anxiety Inventory score at 3 months
Assessment of General Health Status
Change from General Health Questionnaire score at 3 months
Study Arms (2)
Connective Tissue Manipulation
EXPERIMENTALThe participants were administered CTM by a physiotherapist with 11 years of experience in the application from the point at which their menstrual cycles had ended to the beginning of the next cycle. Another assessment was made immediately after the treatment and this was repeated at the second, third and fourth menstrual cycles. The CTM took an average of 20-30 minutes to complete.
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALFollowing the assessment made in the participants' first menstrual cycle, on the most painful day of their second cycle (1st or 2nd day of the cycle), high-frequency TENS was applied at a frequency of 120 Hertz, at intervals of 100 µsn for 20 minutes. The intensity of the current was increased until the participant felt it.
Interventions
The application was delivered with the participant in a sitting position, with the entire back and sacral regions left exposed. The treatment was administered to the sacral, lower thoracic and pelvic regions.
TENS was administered with the participant lying face down with a flat cushion underneath the abdomen. TENS was administered via 2 channels of electrodes placed with the sacral region in the middle. The intensity of the current was increased until the participant felt it.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being between the ages of 18-30
- having a diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea
You may not qualify if:
- having used an oral contraceptive in the last 3 months,
- having an active sexual life,
- pregnancy,
- having gone through childbirth,
- having a neurological deficit,
- any kind of systemic condition,
- a diagnosed gynecological condition (pelvic inflammatory diseases, endometriosis, uterus cancers, ovarian cysts, etc.),
- taking psychotherapeutic drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nesrin Yağcı
Pamukkale University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2020
First Posted
January 22, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 15, 2016
Study Completion
August 30, 2016
Last Updated
January 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share