Development and Evaluation of a Web-based Programme on Relapse Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis
POWER@MS2
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will evaluate a web-based relapse management programme, which is easily accessible for people with multiple sclerosis. The trial is accompanied by a mixed-methods process evaluation and a health economic evaluation. It is expected that the programme will positively change patients' relapse management and strengthen their autonomy and participation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 5, 2023
CompletedSeptember 13, 2023
September 1, 2023
3.2 years
January 2, 2020
September 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of change in relapse treatment (relapses not treated or treated with oral steroids).
Standardized questionnaire to assess change of relapses and their treatment. The questionnaire will be applied during 3-monthly phone interviews.
Telephone interview at month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36 after patient inclusion and after final patient reaches month 12
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Annual relapse rate
Telephone interview at month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36 after patient inclusion and after final patient reaches month 12
Relapse Risk Knowledge
Month 3 and 12 after patient inclusion
Planned Behaviour in MS Scale (PBMS relapse)
Month 3 and 12 after patient inclusion
Control Preference Scale relapse (CPS relapse)
Month 3 after patient inclusion
Patient Activation Measure (PAM)
Baseline, month 3, 12, 24, 30, 36 after patient inclusion and after final patient reaches month 12
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to the intervention group will receive access to the multi-component, web-based intervention programme. The intervention programme will be developed in line with principles of patient empowerment and based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to the control group will receive access to the web-based control programme with optimized standard care.
Interventions
The intervention will be designed as an individualized, dialogue-based system that will provide PwMS coordinated, individually tailored information based on the software platform broca®. The intervention programme will consist of three sections: 1. EBPI/decision aid (five modules plus decision aid in case of an acute relapse) provided by the broca® programme. The key element of the EBPI/decision aid is the information on glucocorticosteroids for the treatment of acute relapses. 2. A webinar led via WebEx by a trained MS nurse with questioning/chat session (approx. 60-75min). 3. A supervised chat room provided via the DMSG (https://www.dmsg.de/ms-connect). In addition, email reminders will be used to enhance involvement of participants.
Participants in the control group will have access to web-based information material offered via the same platform (broca®) in addition to usual care. The control group intervention will be based on material of the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG) on relapse management. The programme will accompany the participants over a period of 4 weeks and a reminder system with neutral e-mail reminders will be used to promote the use of the programme.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- signed informed consent
- clinically isolated syndrom, suspected or diagnosed relapsing remitting MS
- at least 1 relapse in the last year and/or at least 2 relapses in the last 2 years
- access to the internet and ability to use websites
You may not qualify if:
- primary progressive MS
- secondary progressive MS
- acute relapse
- severe visual impairment
- severe psychiatric disorder (judged based on clinical impression)
- allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids
- participation in the EBSIMS training programme (the relapse management training programme was offered in Hamburg and Bad Segeberg)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorflead
- University of Colognecollaborator
- University Medical Center Goettingencollaborator
- Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorfcollaborator
- Gaia AGcollaborator
- Deutsche Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft (DMSG), Bundesverband e.V.collaborator
- MS-Stiftung Triercollaborator
- BBK Dachverband e.V.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Related Publications (17)
Kopke S, Kasper J, Muhlhauser I, Nubling M, Heesen C. Patient education program to enhance decision autonomy in multiple sclerosis relapse management: a randomized-controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2009 Jan;15(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/1352458508095921. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
PMID: 18845657BACKGROUNDKopke S, Richter T, Kasper J, Muhlhauser I, Flachenecker P, Heesen C. Implementation of a patient education program on multiple sclerosis relapse management. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
PMID: 21507595BACKGROUNDHeesen C, Kasper J, Segal J, Kopke S, Muhlhauser I. Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2004 Dec;10(6):643-50. doi: 10.1191/1352458504ms1112oa.
PMID: 15584489BACKGROUNDAjzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. 2011 Sep;26(9):1113-27. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.
PMID: 21929476BACKGROUNDKopke S, Kern S, Ziemssen T, Berghoff M, Kleiter I, Marziniak M, Paul F, Vettorazzi E, Pottgen J, Fischer K, Kasper J, Heesen C. Evidence-based patient information programme in early multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;85(4):411-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306441. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
PMID: 24104856BACKGROUNDHawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):454-66. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn004. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
PMID: 18349033BACKGROUNDKasper J, Kopke S, Fischer K, Schaffler N, Backhus I, Solari A, Heesen C. Applying the theory of planned behaviour to multiple sclerosis patients' decisions on disease modifying therapy--questionnaire concept and validation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 2;12:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-60.
PMID: 22747904BACKGROUNDZill JM, Dwinger S, Kriston L, Rohenkohl A, Harter M, Dirmaier J. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM13). BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 30;13:1027. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1027.
PMID: 24172020BACKGROUNDStepleman L, Rutter MC, Hibbard J, Johns L, Wright D, Hughes M. Validation of the patient activation measure in a multiple sclerosis clinic sample and implications for care. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(19):1558-67. doi: 10.3109/09638280903567885.
PMID: 20590506BACKGROUNDKurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444.
PMID: 6685237BACKGROUNDGold SM, Heesen C, Schulz H, Guder U, Monch A, Gbadamosi J, Buhmann C, Schulz KH. Disease specific quality of life instruments in multiple sclerosis: validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS). Mult Scler. 2001 Apr;7(2):119-30. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700208.
PMID: 11424632BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDCraig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PMID: 18824488BACKGROUNDWenzel L, Heesen C, Peper J, Grentzenberg K, Fasshauer E, Scheiderbauer J, Thale F, Meyer B, Kopke S, Rahn AC. An interactive web-based programme on relapse management for people with multiple sclerosis (POWER@MS2) - development, feasibility, and pilot testing of a complex intervention. Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 23;13:914814. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.914814. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36212638DERIVEDWenzel L, Heesen C, Scheiderbauer J, van de Loo M, Kopke S, Rahn AC. Evaluation of an interactive web-based programme on relapse management for people with multiple sclerosis (POWER@MS2): study protocol for a process evaluation accompanying a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):e046874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046874.
PMID: 34598981DERIVEDRahn AC, Wenzel L, Icks A, Stahmann A, Scheiderbauer J, Grentzenberg K, Vomhof M, Montalbo J, Friede T, Heesen C, Kopke S. Development and evaluation of an interactive web-based decision-making programme on relapse management for people with multiple sclerosis (POWER@MS2)-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Feb 14;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05059-1.
PMID: 33583424DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sascha Köpke, Prof.
Institute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne C Rahn, Prof.
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study will be conducted as an investigator blinded trial and participating physicians as well as MS centres in general will not be provided with any information about group assignment. Randomization will take place only after baseline documentation. Blinding of the trial participants is pursued, but only possible to a limited extent. Furthermore, it cannot be prevented that patients discuss the intervention contents with their physician. Thus participants and neurologists might realize their group assignment. While blinding in complex educational interventions including a webinar is virtually not possible, the only strategy to increase similarity of groups is to have an active control group, which we aim for with the optimized standard care group. Furthermore, the outcome assessors are blinded.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2020
First Posted
January 18, 2020
Study Start
February 17, 2020
Primary Completion
April 30, 2023
Study Completion
May 5, 2023
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
An anonymised data set will be published in major journals in order to disseminate the study results. In addition, all trial results will be communicated at scientific conferences and meetings (e.g. at the yearly DGN congress) by the investigators and presented on the DMSG website and other relevant patient websites.