Evaluation of a Closed-loop Insulin Delivery System at Home With Tailored Home Care Services in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Patients (T2D)
CLOSEAP+
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Closed-loop insulin delivery system has the potential to improve the condition of many poorly controlled insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) patients. A wide acceptance of the Artificial Pancreas (AP) usage in T2D care will strongly depend on the identification of subpopulations and care settings where the AP could significantly improve the risk- and cost-benefit balances of T2D management as compared to established practice. The aim of this interventional study, therefore, is to investigate whether a therapeutic solution combining an automated insulin delivery AP system with a tailored Home Healthcare Provider (HHP) service can improve blood glucose control, reduce the rate of acute metabolic complications (hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia), improve both the patients quality of life and experience, and reduce the healthcare related costs in patients with uncontrolled T2D needing home nursing care for their daily insulin treatment versus usual care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 20, 2025
CompletedApril 20, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.4 years
January 15, 2020
March 13, 2025
April 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time in Range (TIR)
Time In Range, defined as the percentage of time spent with glucose measurements at 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) recorded by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), during the last 14 days completed CGM recording from days 70 to 90
From days 70 to 90
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Time in Range (TIR) During Diurnal Period
At baseline and From days 70 to 90
Time in Range (TIR) During Nocturnal Period
At baseline and From days 70 to 90
Time Above Range (TAR) (Above 180 mg/dL)
At baseline and From days 70 to 90
Time Above Range (TAR) (Above 250 mg/dL)
At baseline and From days 70 to 90
Time Below Range (TBR) (Below 70 mg/dL)
At baseline and From days 70 to 90
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
closed-loop and home care services
EXPERIMENTALautomated insulin delivery system (Closed-loop) with tailored Home Healthcare Provider (HHP) services
usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORmultiple daily injection insulin regimen with family nurse's daily assistance at home for performing insulin injections and/or glucose monitoring
Interventions
closed-loop in patients at home for three months
home healthcare services from Air Liquide in patients at home for three months
multiple daily injection insulin regimen with family nurse's daily assistance at home for performing insulin injections and/or glucose monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient having demonstrated ability to understand the benefits and harms of the automated insulin delivery system and to continuously and safely wear a CGM (Continuous Glucose Monitor), as per investigator's judgement,
- Family nurse having demonstrated ability to use the automated insulin delivery system, as per HHP judgement,
- Patient able to use basic technology such as a cell phone and having demonstrated ability to use the automated insulin delivery system, as per Home Healthcare Provider (HHP) judgment. In case the patient has not demonstrated ability to use the automated insulin delivery system, his (her) caregiver has to demonstrate ability to use basic technology such as a cell phone and the automated insulin delivery system instead as per Home Healthcare Provider (HHP) judgment. The caregiver has to be an adult person able to speak and read French, having demonstrated ability to use the automated insulin delivery system, with no known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol. The caregiver must have committed to maintain uninterrupted availability via personal cell phone and to provide assistance to the patient and must be knowledgeable at all times of the participant's location during the day when closed loop is in use.
- days completed (ie ≥ 70% of the daily data points non missing) CGM data from the selection period (the CGM period may be repeated only once if uncompleted data),
- Patient covered by healthcare insurance (in accordance with French regulation),
- Patient who has received verbal and written information about the study and who signed the informed consent form before any study related procedure.
- Patient under curatorship must have received the agreement of their legal guardian to participate to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman,
- Patient who experienced a severe hypoglycaemic event having led to a hospitalisation or having required a third party assistance within the past 6 months,
- Patient who experienced a diabetic ketoacidosis within the past 6 months,
- Patient who has demonstrated a marked decrease in hypoglycaemia perception defined by a Gold score \> 4,
- Patient who has disabilities which could compromise the compliance to the study, in the investigator's opinion,
- Patient with severe health impairment resulting in short life expectancy (\< 1 year) as assessed by the investigator,
- Patient participating in another interventional or observational clinical trial or who participated in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days before selection,
- Patient known allergy to any component of the automated insulin delivery system compounds,
- Proliferative retinopathy (assessed with a fundus examination or retinal photography performed within 6 months before selection or before the randomisation at the latest) with visual impairment which could compromise the safety of rapid glucose control normalisation and the compliance to the study,
- Planned initiation of a treatment that would impact the blood glucose levels (such as steroids) during the study period,
- Patient deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, patient admitted to a social institution or who is under a measure of legal protection, patient hospitalized without consent or who is in an emergency situation.
- Lack of effective contraception in women of childbearing potential,
- Subject with a history of hearing or vision impairment hindering perception of glucose display and alarms (as this point is a contra-indication stated in the user's manual of the investigational medical device),
- Severe impairment of renal function (Creatinine Clearance \< 30 mL/min),
- Patient on dialysis (as the user's manual of Dexcom G6 states that G6 readings may be inaccurate in this population)
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
CHRU Brest
Brest, Brittany Region, 29609, France
CHU Rouen
Rouen, Normandy, 76230, France
CHU Amiens
Amiens, Picardie, 80054, France
CHU Caen
Caen, 14033, France
Hopital Européen de Marseille
Marseille, 13003, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
CHU Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091, France
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059, France
CHRU Nancy-Hôpitaux de Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
APHP Lariboisière
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75475, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marie-Danielle MILCENT / Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- Air Liquide Santé International
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yves REZNIK, Pr
CHU CAEN
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2020
First Posted
January 18, 2020
Study Start
December 30, 2019
Primary Completion
May 30, 2022
Study Completion
May 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 20, 2025
Results First Posted
April 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04