Enhanced Palliative Care in MDS and AML
Impact of Enhanced Haematology Palliative Care Services in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of enhanced haematology palliative care services to the most symptomatic group of blood cancer patients, namely myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Hypothesis to be tested: To test whether early integration of dedicated palliative care will improve the quality of life, mood and caregiver burden in patients with MDS and AML. Design and subjects: This is a 24-month open-label randomized controlled trial. Subjects include patients with MDS and AML. Study instruments: Interventions will be carried out by a dedicated team comprising palliative care physicians, haematologists, palliative care nurse specialists, and social workers. Outcome measures will be determined using validated questionnaires and data collection tools. Interventions: In this trial, enhanced haematology palliative care integrated to conventional supportive care versus conventional supportive care alone will be compared. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures include quality of life, mood and caregiver burden. The secondary outcome measures include number of admissions to acute hospital and intensive care and overall survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedOctober 4, 2022
October 1, 2022
4 years
January 6, 2020
October 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
McGill Quality of Life (MQOL) Questionnaire Score
It is a 17-item patient-rated measure of QOL for patients receiving palliative care.This questionnaire was translated and validated in Hong Kong. The questionnaire consists of five domains: physical well-being (five items), psychological well-being (six items), existential well-being (four items), support (two items), and sexual function (one item). In addition, there is a single item to rate their perceived quality of life. The response categories are based on a numerical scale from 0-10 with verbal anchors at the end of the scale. For the final statistical analysis, all scores are transposed on a 0-10 scale, with 0 representing the least and 10 indicating the most desirable situation. The mean total QOL score is the average of all the 5 domain scores, with 0 representing the worst situation. The overall validation results of the MQOL-HK were acceptable. Cronbach's α for the MQOL-HK subscale ranged from 0.68 to 0.85.
24 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Levels of anxiety and depression were self-rated by HADS, which has been found to perform well as a test for such symptoms in the general population, in cancer patients and in primary care patients. Subjects decide on how each item applies to them on a scale ranging from no feelings of anxiety or depression (0) to severe feelings of anxiety or depression (3), with scores ranging from 0 to 21 on each subscale. A subscale score of 8 to 10 indicates a possible case of anxiety or depression, whereas a subscale score of 11 or higher indicates a definite case of anxiety or depression. Severe depression or anxiety disorders are suspected for subjects scoring 15 or higher.24 The Cantonese-Chinese version of the HADS25 has been found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.77), reasonable sensitivity (0.79) and specificity (0.80), as well as positive (0.77) and negative predictive values (0.82).
24 weeks
Zariet Burden Interview (ZBI)
The ZBI is a widely used 22-item assessment tool for measuring the caregiver's perceived burden in providing family care. The questionnaire was translated, and modified according to Hong Kong cultural standards. The ZBI scale was developed to measure burden among family caregivers of persons with dementia; however, it has been used in other populations and was selected for this study because of the high reliability and validity of the Chinese version, indicated by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.99 and a correlation coefficient of 0.81. The correlation between ZBI and general Health Questionnaire was 0.59 (p\<0.001), and the correlation between Caregiver Activity Survey was 0.057 (p\<0.001), suggesting high conceptual validity. The items were scored on a five-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Scores were calculated by summing up the total chosen statement which ranges from 0 to 88, that higher scores implying greater perceived caregiver burden.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of admissions to acute hospital
24 weeks
Number of admission to intensive care unit
24 weeks
Overall survival
24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Enhanced Haematology Palliative Care ("Fast-track") Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients who are assigned to enhanced haematology palliative care ("fast-track" group) will be seen, within 2 days of enrollment, at the out-patient clinic or in-patient setting by the haematology palliative care team that comprises a palliative medicine specialist or a haematologist with palliative care experience, a full-time palliative care nurse, and a medical social worker concentrating on haematology palliative patients.
Conventional Supportive Care Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who are assigned to the conventional supportive care group will be under care of haematologists and nurse specialists in haematology After 12 weeks of conventional supportive care, patients randomized to this group will receive services from the palliative care team and assessed every two weeks same the "fast-track" group
Interventions
Early and proactive multidisciplinary care
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) defined using the World Health Organization Classification 2016.
- Patients who are able to read and respond to questions in Chinese.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are already receiving care from a palliative care unit will be excluded. Patients who require immediate palliative care service, e.g. end-of-life care, will be excluded and receive palliative care immediately.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (25)
Thol F, Schlenk RF, Heuser M, Ganser A. How I treat refractory and early relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015 Jul 16;126(3):319-27. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-10-551911. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PMID: 25852056RESULTJuliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, Lehmann S, Mollgard L, Stockelberg D, Tidefelt U, Wahlin A, Hoglund M. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood. 2009 Apr 30;113(18):4179-87. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-172007. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
PMID: 19008455RESULTPrebet T, Gore SD, Esterni B, Gardin C, Itzykson R, Thepot S, Dreyfus F, Rauzy OB, Recher C, Ades L, Quesnel B, Beach CL, Fenaux P, Vey N. Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 20;29(24):3322-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8135. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
PMID: 21788559RESULTEpstein AS, Goldberg GR, Meier DE. Palliative care and hematologic oncology: the promise of collaboration. Blood Rev. 2012 Nov;26(6):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 5.
PMID: 22874874RESULTManitta V, Zordan R, Cole-Sinclair M, Nandurkar H, Philip J. The symptom burden of patients with hematological malignancy: a cross-sectional observational study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Sep;42(3):432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PMID: 21477979RESULTFadul NA, El Osta B, Dalal S, Poulter VA, Bruera E. Comparison of symptom burden among patients referred to palliative care with hematologic malignancies versus those with solid tumors. J Palliat Med. 2008 Apr;11(3):422-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0184.
PMID: 18363482RESULTManitta VJ, Philip JA, Cole-Sinclair MF. Palliative care and the hemato-oncological patient: can we live together? A review of the literature. J Palliat Med. 2010 Aug;13(8):1021-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0267.
PMID: 20712465RESULTFerrell BR, Temel JS, Temin S, Alesi ER, Balboni TA, Basch EM, Firn JI, Paice JA, Peppercorn JM, Phillips T, Stovall EL, Zimmermann C, Smith TJ. Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):96-112. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1474. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
PMID: 28034065RESULTBakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, Balan S, Brokaw FC, Seville J, Hull JG, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Byock IR, Ahles TA. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Aug 19;302(7):741-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1198.
PMID: 19690306RESULTBakitas MA, Tosteson TD, Li Z, Lyons KD, Hull JG, Li Z, Dionne-Odom JN, Frost J, Dragnev KH, Hegel MT, Azuero A, Ahles TA. Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Concurrent Palliative Oncology Care: Patient Outcomes in the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 1;33(13):1438-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.6362. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
PMID: 25800768RESULTDionne-Odom JN, Azuero A, Lyons KD, Hull JG, Tosteson T, Li Z, Li Z, Frost J, Dragnev KH, Akyar I, Hegel MT, Bakitas MA. Benefits of Early Versus Delayed Palliative Care to Informal Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 1;33(13):1446-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.7824. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
PMID: 25800762RESULTZimmermann C, Swami N, Krzyzanowska M, Hannon B, Leighl N, Oza A, Moore M, Rydall A, Rodin G, Tannock I, Donner A, Lo C. Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 May 17;383(9930):1721-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62416-2. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
PMID: 24559581RESULTLeBlanc TW, El-Jawahri A. When and why should patients with hematologic malignancies see a palliative care specialist? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:471-8. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2015.1.471.
PMID: 26637760RESULTCheng HW, Li CW, Chan KY, Au HY, Chan PF, Sin YC, Szeto Y, Sham MK. End-of-life characteristics and palliative care provision for elderly patients suffering from acute myeloid leukemia. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2333-x. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
PMID: 24996833RESULTCheng HW. Optimizing End-of-Life Care for Patients With Hematological Malignancy: Rethinking the Role of Palliative Care Collaboration. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):e5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 25656326RESULTRoberts C, Torgerson D. Randomisation methods in controlled trials. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1301. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1301. No abstract available.
PMID: 9804722RESULTRinck GC, van den Bos GA, Kleijnen J, de Haes HJ, Schade E, Veenhof CH. Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Apr;15(4):1697-707. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1697.
PMID: 9193371RESULTHigginson IJ, Finlay IG, Goodwin DM, Hood K, Edwards AG, Cook A, Douglas HR, Normand CE. Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Feb;25(2):150-68. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00599-7.
PMID: 12590031RESULTChan KY, Yip T, Yap DY, Sham MK, Wong YC, Lau VW, Li CW, Cheng BH, Lo WK, Chan TM. Enhanced Psychosocial Support for Caregiver Burden for Patients With Chronic Kidney Failure Choosing Not to Be Treated by Dialysis or Transplantation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Apr;67(4):585-92. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
PMID: 26549852RESULTLo RS, Woo J, Zhoc KC, Li CY, Yeo W, Johnson P, Mak Y, Lee J. Cross-cultural validation of the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese. Palliat Med. 2001 Sep;15(5):387-97. doi: 10.1191/026921601680419438.
PMID: 11591090RESULTLeung CM, Wing YK, Kwong PK, Lo A, Shum K. Validation of the Chinese-Cantonese version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999 Dec;100(6):456-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb10897.x.
PMID: 10626925RESULTZarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649. No abstract available.
PMID: 7203086RESULTArai Y, Kudo K, Hosokawa T, Washio M, Miura H, Hisamichi S. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden interview. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997 Oct;51(5):281-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1997.tb03199.x.
PMID: 9413874RESULTKo KT, Yip PK, Liu SI, Huang CR. Chinese version of the Zarit caregiver Burden Interview: a validation study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;16(6):513-8. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318167ae5b.
PMID: 18515696RESULTKimmel PL, Emont SL, Newmann JM, Danko H, Moss AH. ESRD patient quality of life: symptoms, spiritual beliefs, psychosocial factors, and ethnicity. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Oct;42(4):713-21. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00907-7.
PMID: 14520621RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harinder Singh Harry Gill, MD
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2020
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
January 9, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
October 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared.