Extension Study for 43USSA1705
Open Label Extension Study for 43USSA1705 (A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Sculptra Aesthetic for Correction of Nasolabial Folds)
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
4
Brief Summary
To evaluate the long-term safety of Sculptra Aesthetic as a single regimen for correction of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) contour deficiencies after changes in reconstitution and injection procedures compared to the approved label.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 29, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 12, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.2 years
December 4, 2019
February 2, 2023
February 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96
The WAS is a validated photograph-based outcome instrument that is designed specifically for quantifying facial folds. Scoring of NLF wrinkle severity (grades 0-5, with 0 representing no wrinkles and 5 representing very deep wrinkles, redundant fold) was based on visual live assessment by the Blinded Evaluator at defined timepoints. Lower scores indicate better outcome. Effectiveness is defined as change from baseline on both sides of the face using WAS at 72 and 96 weeks after the first treatment session. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244), Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Based on the Participants Live Assessment
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the GAIS Based on the Investigator Live Assessment
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Lines Rasch Transformed Total Scores: NLF Questionnaire
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Recommend the Treatment to a Friend?
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You do the Treatment Again?
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Sculptra Aesthetic
EXPERIMENTALParticipants who completed 48 weeks of Sculptra Aesthetic reconstituted with 8 milliliters (mL) of sterile water for injection (SWFI) in study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244) were followed into this long-term extension study at Week 72 and Week 96 after baseline (i.e., Day 1/first treatment session with Sculptra Aesthetic in Study 43USSA1705 \[NCT03780244\]). No investigational product was provided during this extension study.
Interventions
No intervention was administered during this extension study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Randomized to Sculptra Aesthetic 8ml reconstitution and successfully completed study 43USSA1705
You may not qualify if:
- Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
- Participation in any interventional clinical study throughout the duration of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (4)
Galderma Study Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255, United States
Galderma Study Site
Bradenton, Florida, 34209, United States
Galderma Study Site
Austin, Texas, 78746, United States
Galderma Study Site
Spring, Texas, 77388, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- QMedAB
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2019
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
December 3, 2019
Primary Completion
January 29, 2021
Study Completion
January 29, 2021
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Results First Posted
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share