Safety Study That Compares Perlane to Perlane With Lidocaine (Perlane-L) While Correcting Wrinkles in the Area Around Your Nose
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Safety and Tolerability of Perlane® With and Without Addition of 0.3% Lidocaine HCL During Correction of Nasolabial Folds
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Safety study that compares Perlane to Perlane with Lidocaine while correcting wrinkles in the area around your nose.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2010
CompletedNovember 30, 2010
November 1, 2010
2 months
January 14, 2009
August 25, 2010
November 1, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Difference in VAS (Perlane Side - Perlane-L Side) With Difference in VAS >= 10 mm
After Injection on Day of Treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Subjects Showing Wrinkle Improvement at Day 14
14 days after treatment when compared to baseline
Study Arms (1)
Perlane and Perlane-L
OTHERThis is a split-face design injecting both Perlane and Perlane-L injectable gels, administered once. Each subject received Perlane-L on one side of the face, and Perlane on the other. Subjects were blinded to which side of their face receive Perlane or Perlane-L. The study was randomized and treatments successive.
Interventions
This is a split face design and each subject received both Perlane-L and Perlane. Treatments were blinded, randomized, and successive.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Same Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score at both Nasolabial Folds (either both Moderate \[3\] or both Severe \[4\])
You may not qualify if:
- Active or chronic skin disease, inflammation or related conditions, near or on the Nasolabial Folds
- Subjects who had undergone procedures based on active dermal response (e.g., laser or chemical peeling procedures) within 6 months prior to study entry
- Use of any facial tissue augmenting therapy with non-permanent filler or aesthetic facial surgical therapy within 9 months prior to study entry
- Permanent implant placed in the Nasolabial Fold area
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medicis Global Service Corporationlead
- Q-Med Scandinavia, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Mount Cisco, New York, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mary Sanstead
- Organization
- Medicis
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mary Sanstead
Medicis Global Pharmaceutical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2009
First Posted
January 15, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 30, 2010
Results First Posted
November 30, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-11