WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap
Pivotal Trial of WaveLight® EX500 Excimer Laser System for the Correction of Myopia With and Without Astigmatism Using InnovEyes™ in Conjunction With InnovEyes™ Sightmap
1 other identifier
interventional
272
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system for the correction of myopia with and without astigmatism using InnovEyes in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 6, 2025
CompletedApril 6, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.7 years
January 3, 2020
March 19, 2025
March 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) of 20/40 or Better (in Eyes With Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 or Better) at Refractive Stability
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 4 meters and reported in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Preoperatively, VA was assessed with correction in place. Postoperatively, VA was assessed with no correction in place. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within +/- 0.50 Diopter (D) at Refractive Stability
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive Stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With MRSE Within +/- 1.00 D at Refractive Stability
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes That Achieve Refractive Stability Assessed as Change From Baseline in MRSE of Equal to or Less Than 1.0 D
A manifest refraction (manual refraction) was performed using a phoropter. The spherical equivalent was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power and reported in diopters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Preoperative Visit (Day -30 to Day -1), Month 1, Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Worse Than 20/40 (With BCDVA 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability
VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place. BCDVA was measured in Snellen, where 20/20 indicates normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With BCDVA Loss of 2 Lines (10 Letters) or More From Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
VA was assessed using ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters with correction in place and measured in logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution, where each line on the letter chart represents 0.1 Snellen and 0.0 logMAR equates to 20/20 Snellen, or normal distance eyesight. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With Increase of Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 Diopter (D) of Absolute Cylinder Compared to Preoperative Visit at Refractive Stability
Manifest refractive astigmatism is the cylindrical portion of the subjective refraction. It is measured with ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 meters. Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Day -30 to -1 (preoperative), up to Month 3
Percentage of Eyes With Non-flap Related Ocular Serious Adverse Events at Refractive Stability
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). Refractive stability was defined as the latter of two postoperative manifest refractions performed at least 3 months apart (or at Month 3 after surgery when compared with the Month 1 visit) that meets all the protocol-specified stability requirements. Refractive stability was considered to be achieved at the Month 3 visit. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome. Both eyes contributed data to this analysis. No hypothesis testing was pre-specified for this endpoint. This is a co-primary endpoint.
Up to Month 3
Study Arms (1)
WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system
EXPERIMENTALLaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser with InnovEyes software in conjunction with InnovEyes sightmap
Interventions
FDA approved stationary scanning-spot excimer laser system used during refractive surgery for the treatment of myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism. For this clinical study, the WaveLight EX500 software will be upgraded to include the InnovEyes treatment.
Procedure that reshapes the front part of the eye (cornea) so that light traveling through it is properly focused on the back part of the eye (retina). The procedure will be performed using the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system and data obtained from the InnovEyes sightmap.
Non-contact ophthalmic diagnostic device that captures images of the eye and collects ocular data preoperatively to generate a patient-specific ablation profile for refractive correction surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Myopia up to and including -11.00 D with or without astigmatism up to -4.50 D, with MRSE no more than -12.00 D
- Best corrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better
- Uncorrected photopic distance visual acuity of 20/40 or worse
- Stable refraction (within ± 0.50 D) as determined by MRSE for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery
You may not qualify if:
- History or evidence of active or inactive corneal disease or retinal vascular disease, keratoconus or glaucoma (or suspect)
- Previous intraocular or corneal surgery
- Intent to have monovision treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
Study Sites (9)
Alcon Investigative Site
San Diego, California, 92122, United States
Price Vision Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815-7018, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64154, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63017, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68135, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75243, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Projects Director, Surgical
- Organization
- Alcon Research, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, Surgical
Alcon Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2020
First Posted
January 7, 2020
Study Start
March 9, 2020
Primary Completion
November 9, 2022
Study Completion
November 9, 2022
Last Updated
April 6, 2025
Results First Posted
April 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share