IOP Device Comparison Study
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Icare PRO, Icare ic200, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
1 other identifier
observational
101
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intraocular pressure measurement (IOP) is part of a routine eye examination. High and low eye pressure may be linked to certain eye conditions such as glaucoma. The current gold standard for IOP measurement is a technique called Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT requires the use of a Goldmann applanation tonometer mounted on a slit lamp. Apart from GAT, there are many other devices that can be used to measure IOP, including the iCare tonometers. In this prospective study, investigators will be measuring participant's IOP with GAT, Icare PRO, and Icare ic200 tonometers to see if there is an agreement in IOP between the different devices. Investigator will also look if there is a concordance between different tonometers in low, moderate and high IOP range. Given the postural requirements for performing GAT, patients with higher body mass index (BMI) tend to have difficulties with proper positioning at the slit lamp that may lead to inaccurate GAT measurements. To this end, investigators will analyze the effect of BMI on IOP measurements with different devices. Additionally, comfort level of the patients with different tonometry devices will be recorded using a visual analog scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2021
CompletedSeptember 2, 2021
June 1, 2020
1.4 years
December 21, 2019
August 31, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concordance in IOP between GAT and Icare ic200
Primary objective of this study is to compare overall Mean IOP between GAT and Icare ic200
It's a single visit study and it is anticipated that study procedures will increase the duration of the clinic visit by 20 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Concordance in IOP between GAT and Icare PRO
It's a single visit study and it is anticipated that study procedures will increase the duration of the clinic visit by 20 minutes.
Concordance among tonometers in low IOP range
It's a single visit study and it is anticipated that study procedures will increase the duration of the clinic visit by 20 minutes.
Concordance among tonometers in medium IOP range
It's a single visit study and it is anticipated that study procedures will increase the duration of the clinic visit by 20 minutes.
Concordance among tonometers in high IOP range
It's a single visit study and it is anticipated that study procedures will increase the duration of the clinic visit by 20 minutes.
Proportion of Icare IOP measurements with GAT recordings
It's a single visit study and it is anticipated that study procedures will increase the duration of the clinic visit by 20 minutes.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Glaucoma suspect or patients
Patients who has or suspected Glaucoma will be approached for the recruitment into this study. IOP will be measured in the sitting position with Icare tonometers in a random order in both the eyes. IOP measurements by GAT will be taken after Icare measurements followed by CCT recording with ultrasound pachymeter.
Interventions
Icare tonometers are a new class of rebound tonometers for IOP measurements. The Icare series of tonometers are hand-held tonometers, which are easy to operate and generally do not require topical anaesthesia for IOP measurements.
Eligibility Criteria
Glaucoma suspects or patients who are older than 18 years are invited to participate in this study.
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than 18 years
- Willingness to participate in all study procedures, along with signed written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age younger than 18 years
- Participants with corneal defects (edema, scarring, cicatrix, opacity)
- Participants with epithelial lesions, prior refractive surgery and keratoplasty surgery
- Participants having corneal astigmatism ≥ 3D
- Participants who wear contact lenses
- Participants with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Uveitis
- Participants who are unable to have IOP measured by Goldmann Tonometry
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Participants with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Uveitis
- Participation in a clinical trial with investigational products
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ivey Eye Institute at St Joseph hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada
Related Publications (13)
Nakakura S. Icare(R) rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 12;12:1245-1253. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S163092. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30034218RESULTKass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology. 1996 Jan;103(1):183-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30741-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 8628552RESULTPakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):43-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318133fb32.
PMID: 18303384RESULTKim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;91(5):e392-6. doi: 10.1111/aos.12109. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
PMID: 23521889RESULTYildiz A, Yasar T. Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results. Med Glas (Zenica). 2018 Aug 1;15(2):152-157. doi: 10.17392/960-18.
PMID: 30047543RESULTPoostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, Purdie G, Wells A. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;37(7):687-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02109.x.
PMID: 19788665RESULTGrewal DS, Stinnett SS, Folgar FA, Schneider EW, Vajzovic L, Asrani S, Freedman SF, Mruthyunjaya P, Hahn P. A Comparative Study of Rebound Tonometry With Tonopen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Following Vitreoretinal Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;161:22-8.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
PMID: 26408266RESULTRateb M, Abdel-Radi M, Eldaly Z, Elmohamady MN, Noor El Din A. Comparison of IOP Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare Rebound Tonometer, and Tono-Pen in Keratoconus Patients after MyoRing Implantation. J Ophthalmol. 2019 May 9;2019:1964107. doi: 10.1155/2019/1964107. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31210982RESULTNakakura S, Mori E, Fujio Y, Fujisawa Y, Matsuya K, Kobayashi Y, Tabuchi H, Asaoka R, Kiuchi Y. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2019 Feb;28(2):172-177. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001138.
PMID: 30689609RESULTMunkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Thieme H. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;246(6):875-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0758-3. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
PMID: 18196259RESULTBrusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2006 Jun;15(3):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212208.87523.66.
PMID: 16778643RESULTRodter TH, Knippschild S, Baulig C, Krummenauer F. Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare(R) PRO-based rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;30(2):245-252. doi: 10.1177/1120672119866067. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
PMID: 31466475RESULTSchweier C, Hanson JV, Funk J, Toteberg-Harms M. Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep 5;13:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-44.
PMID: 24006952RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tony Lin, MD
Ivey Eye Institute- St Joseph's hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2019
First Posted
December 26, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
July 31, 2021
Study Completion
July 31, 2021
Last Updated
September 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-06