Comparing Efficacy of Microwave Vs Embolization Treatment for Adenomyosis
ADENOMIC
Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Study of Symptom Improvement After Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) Versus Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous/transvaginal Microwave Ablation, Evaluated by Validated Questionnaires
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Single blinded randomized controlled study of symptom improvement after uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus ultrasound guided percutaneous/transvaginal microwave ablation, evaluated by validated questionnaires. Adenomyosis is a benign condition causing pain and bleeding disorders in many women. Hysterectomy has historically been the golden standard for treatment as well as (postoperatively) diagnosis of the disease. In accordance with refined diagnostic tools such as ultrasound and/or MRI, minimally invasive treatments for adenomyosis are being explored. We plan to compare two minimally invasive techniques: embolization of the uterine artery (a commonly used procedure) and microwave ablation of adenomyotic tissue (previously only in clinical use in China).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
November 20, 2024
October 1, 2024
5.8 years
December 16, 2019
November 18, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. Symptom improvement 6 months post treatment (+/-21 days) compared to pre treatment, evaluated by UFS-QOL - The score on Symptom Severity Scale
Symptom improvement evaluated by the validated questionnaire UFS-QOL, which is subdivided into Symptom Severity Scale (0-100, where higher number represent worsened symptoms) and HRQL items (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness and sexual function, range 0-100 where higher numbers represent better Quality of Life)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Reduction of adenomyosis by imaging
6 months
Hospitalization
Up to 8 weeks post treatment
Sick leave
Up to 8 weeks post treatment
Pain medication
Up to 8 weeks post treatment
Acceptability
2 months and 6 months post treatment
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Microwave treatment
EXPERIMENTALPercutaneous or vaginal application of microwave antenna with microwave treatment for adenomyosis
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORUterine artery embolization; percutaneous application of a catheter into the femoral artery or branches thereof
Interventions
Microwave treatment via needle antenna, (Emprint Covidien microwave ablation system) either percutaneous or vaginally administrated
Embolization via percutaneous catheter
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy women aged 30-55 with symptomatic adenomyosis
- Premenopausal
- Adenomyosis diagnosted by TVUS
- Willing to comply with protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Body Mass Index \>35
- Treatment with anticoagulant/bleeding disorder
- Contraindication for UAE or general anesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Danderyd Hospital
Stockholm, 182 88, Sweden
Related Publications (18)
Struble J, Reid S, Bedaiwy MA. Adenomyosis: A Clinical Review of a Challenging Gynecologic Condition. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):164-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PMID: 26427702BACKGROUNDPinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, Centini G, Orlandini C, Luisi S, Zupi E, Exacoustos C, Petraglia F. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;46(6):730-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.14834.
PMID: 25728241BACKGROUNDDueholm M. Uterine adenomyosis and infertility, review of reproductive outcome after in vitro fertilization and surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jun;96(6):715-726. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13158.
PMID: 28556124BACKGROUNDLi X, Liu X, Guo SW. Clinical profiles of 710 premenopausal women with adenomyosis who underwent hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):485-94. doi: 10.1111/jog.12211. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
PMID: 24148010BACKGROUNDVan den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;51:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
PMID: 29506961BACKGROUNDSheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, Lu D. The LNG-IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis. Contraception. 2009 Mar;79(3):189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
PMID: 19185671BACKGROUNDde Bruijn AM, Smink M, Lohle PNM, Huirne JAF, Twisk JWR, Wong C, Schoonmade L, Hehenkamp WJK. Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Dec;28(12):1629-1642.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.07.034. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
PMID: 29032946BACKGROUNDde Bruijn AM, Lohle PN, Huirne JA, de Vries J, Twisk M; QUESTA-Trial Group; Hehenkamp WJ. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Protocol for the Randomized QUESTA Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):e47. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8512.
PMID: 29496654BACKGROUNDGuo Q, Xu F, Ding Z, Li P, Wang X, Gao B. High intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: a comparative study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):505-509. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1509238. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
PMID: 30306813BACKGROUNDHai N, Zhang J, Xu R, Han ZY, Liu FY. Percutaneous microwave ablation with artificial ascites for symptomatic uterine adenomyosis: initial experience. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017 Sep;33(6):646-652. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1285444. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28118773BACKGROUNDXu RF, Zhang J, Han ZY, Zhang BS, Liu H, Li XM, Ge HL, Dong XJ. Variables associated with vaginal discharge after ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 Aug;32(5):504-10. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2016.1150523. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
PMID: 27087631BACKGROUNDYang Y, Zhang J, Han ZY, Ma X, Hao YL, Xu CT, Xu RF, Zhang BS. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis: efficacy of treatment and effect on ovarian function. Sci Rep. 2015 May 5;5:10034. doi: 10.1038/srep10034.
PMID: 25942631BACKGROUNDXia M, Jing Z, Zhi-Yu H, Jian-Ming C, Hong-Yu Z, Rui-Fang X, Yu Y, Yan-Li H, Bao-Wei D. Feasibility study on energy prediction of microwave ablation upon uterine adenomyosis and leiomyomas by MRI. Br J Radiol. 2014 Aug;87(1040):20130770. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130770. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
PMID: 24947033BACKGROUNDZhang J, Han ZY, Feng L, Wang F, Hu DM, Wen B, Li ZC. [Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation in the treatment of diffuse adenomyosis]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Oct 25;91(39):2749-52. Chinese.
PMID: 22322052BACKGROUNDReid PC, Coker A, Coltart R. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study. BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):320-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13225.x.
PMID: 10740326BACKGROUNDSpies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
PMID: 11814511BACKGROUNDHarding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Spies JB. The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Nov 12;6:99. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-99.
PMID: 19014505BACKGROUNDCoyne KS, Margolis MK, Murphy J, Spies J. Validation of the UFS-QOL-hysterectomy questionnaire: modifying an existing measure for comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.1387. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PMID: 22867776BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helena Kopp Kallner, MD PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Consultant, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2019
First Posted
December 23, 2019
Study Start
September 16, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
November 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share