Study Stopped
Recruitment was unable to be obtained in a timely fashion, so the study was stopped.
Continuous Nerve Block Block vs Combination of Single Block Plus Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.
A Prospective, Randomized, Active-Comparator, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study of the Efficacy of Continuous Nerve Block vs Single Block Plus Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A multimodal analgesic regimen including regional anesthesia is used at UPMC Shadyside for primary thoracic and major abdominal surgeries. The current standard-of-care regional anesthesia techniques include Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block for video assisted thorascopic surgery (VATS) and Quadratus Lumborum (QL) block for major abdominal surgery. These blocks are routinely administered as a continuous catheter technique in order to extend the duration of postoperative analgesia. Although rare, continuous nerve block techniques carry risks and limitations, including catheter dislodgement, migration, kinking and leaking at the site, bleeding, and infection. They are also much more expensive to perform and maintain than single-injection nerve blocks at this institution. Perioperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine is one of the safest local anesthetics, and its use has been shown to provide analgesia and reduce opioid requirements. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that part of the analgesic efficacy of continuous peripheral nerve blocks may be due to the systemic effects of the local anesthetic infused at the site. Therefore, it is possible that the combination of a single block followed by an infusion of IV lidocaine may provide the same benefits as a continuous nerve block at a lower cost. The purpose of this study is to show that a single block technique plus IV lidocaine is non-inferior to a continuous block technique. For the purpose of this study we chose two surgical models--VATS and major abdominal surgery--and ESP and QL blocks, respectively. The study will be conducted as a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, active-comparator, noninferiority trial. The study will prospectively investigate the efficacy of continuous block versus single block plus IV lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing primary unilateral VATS or primary major abdominal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 18, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 13, 2023
CompletedSeptember 13, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.2 years
December 19, 2019
August 2, 2023
August 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opioid Consumption After Surgery
Opioids will be converted to oral morphine equivalents
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Opioid Consumption After Surgery
48 hours after surgery
Opioid Consumption After Surgery
72 hours after surgery
Pain After Surgery
6 hours after surgery
Pain After Surgery
12 hours after surgery
Pain After Surgery
24 hours after surgery
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Continuous nerve blocks
ACTIVE COMPARATORA total of 30 subjects equally distributed to either continuous Erector Spinae Plane block for unilateral thoracic surgery , or continuous Quadratus Lumborum block for major abdominal surgery. Patients in this group will receive 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine per block performed after positioning of the needle followed by continuous perineural infusion of 0.25% lidocaine (10ml/hr) beginning in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and continued for 72 hours or until 12 hours prior to patient discharge, whichever comes first, which is standard of care at this institution.
Single nerve blocks plus IV lidocaine infusion
EXPERIMENTALA total of 30 subjects equally distributed to either Erector Spinae Plane block for unilateral thoracic surgery, or Quadratus Lumborum block for major abdominal surgery, will be included . Patients in this group will receive 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine, 4mg dexamethasone, and 20mcg dexmedetomidine (30mcg if only one block is performed) per block after proper positioning of the Tuohy needle. Upon patient arrival in the recovery room a continuous infusion of IV lidocaine 50 mg /hr will be started and continued for 72 hours or until 12 hours prior to patient discharge, whichever comes first, which is standard of care at this institution.
Interventions
To be administered to subjects in the active comparator group receiving primary unilateral thoracic surgery.
To be administered to subjects in the active comparator group receiving primary major abdominal surgery.
To be administered to subjects in the experimental group receiving primary unilateral thoracic surgery.
To be administered to subjects in the experimental group receiving primary major abdominal surgery.
To be given postoperatively as a continuous infusion at a dose of 50 mg/hr in the experimental group.
To be used in both treatment arms as nerve block initial bolus injection.
To be used in the experimental arm as a nerve block adjuvant to promote prolonged single block duration, as is standard of care in this institution.
To be used in the experimental arm as a nerve block adjuvant to promote prolonged single block duration, as is standard of care in this institution.
To be used perineurally as a 0.25% solution in the active comparator group at a rate of 10 ml/hr per perineural catheter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- Primary unilateral VATS or major abdominal surgery
- BMI 20-36, weight ≥ 50kg
- Male and Female
- All races
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Inpatient status at the time of surgery
- ASA class 4 or greater
- Pregnancy
- Non-English speaking or inability to participate in the study
- Patients with coagulopathy or on therapeutic anticoagulation
- Chronic steroid use
- Opioid use disorder
- Contraindication to performing any of the proposed blocks - active infection at the block site, systemic infection, allergy to local anesthetic medications
- Patients undergoing second surgery or urgent/emergent surgery
- Patients weighing \< 50kg
- History of chronic pain and/or opioid tolerant
- Anticipated requirement for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)
- Allergy or intolerance to any medication specified in the study protocol or postoperative pain management regimen
- Liver disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jeremy Kearnslead
Study Sites (1)
UPMC Shadyside Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Related Publications (9)
Akerman M, Pejcic N, Velickovic I. A Review of the Quadratus Lumborum Block and ERAS. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 26;5:44. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00044. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29536008BACKGROUNDFang B, Wang Z, Huang X. Ultrasound-guided preoperative single-dose erector spinae plane block provides comparable analgesia to thoracic paravertebral block following thoracotomy: a single center randomized controlled double-blind study. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Apr;7(8):174. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.53.
PMID: 31168455BACKGROUNDTsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
PMID: 30292068BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison With Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581.
PMID: 27749354BACKGROUNDMacFater WS, Rahiri JL, Lauti M, Su'a B, Hill AG. Intravenous lignocaine in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):879-885. doi: 10.1111/ans.14084. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
PMID: 28677829BACKGROUNDMasic D, Liang E, Long C, Sterk EJ, Barbas B, Rech MA. Intravenous Lidocaine for Acute Pain: A Systematic Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Dec;38(12):1250-1259. doi: 10.1002/phar.2189. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
PMID: 30303542BACKGROUNDNjathi CW, Johnson RL, Laughlin RS, Schroeder DR, Jacob AK, Kopp SL. Complications After Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Blockade for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):446-450. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000589.
PMID: 28277419BACKGROUNDShanthanna H, Moisuik P, O'Hare T, Srinathan S, Finley C, Paul J, Slinger P. Survey of Postoperative Regional Analgesia for Thoracoscopic Surgeries in Canada. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Aug;32(4):1750-1755. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
PMID: 29402627BACKGROUNDWeibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, Helf A, Eberhart LH, Hahnenkamp K, Hollmann MW, Poepping DM, Schnabel A, Kranke P. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.
PMID: 29864216BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We were not able to enroll enough subjects in a timely manner and our enrollment numbers did not reach the goal of our pilot study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeremy Kearns, MD
- Organization
- UPMC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacques E Chelly, MD, PhD, MBA
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- For study participants, the investigator placing the block will record in the narrative that "this patient is a study participant and received Paravertebral block with ESP approach" or "this patient is a study participant and received TAP block with QL approach". By documenting blocks in this way, the research team member collecting the data will be blinded to whether the patient received continuous block with 0.5% ropivacaine, or single block with 0.5% ropivacaine, dexamethasone, and dexmedetomidine.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2019
First Posted
December 23, 2019
Study Start
May 26, 2021
Primary Completion
August 18, 2022
Study Completion
August 18, 2022
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Results First Posted
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share