Post-traumatic Stress Injuries Among Paramedics and Emergency Dispatchers
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
As part of their work, emergency first responders, such as paramedics and emergency medical dispatchers are exposed daily to traumatic events. These traumatic events can have many impacts on mental health, such as acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Research has shown that intervening early after exposure to a traumatic event helps to identify people at risk and to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder. The Psychological First Aid approach originally developed for mass traumas, is an intervention advocated by international experts today following a traumatic event. However, this approach is still very little studied, especially when it is part of an organization of emergency first responders. It therefore still lacks scientific validity. The main objective of this research will be to assess whether the Psychological First Aid program provided by peer-support workers helps to reduce the initial distress caused by traumatic events and to foster short- and long-term adaptive functioning and coping.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedDecember 17, 2019
December 1, 2019
8 months
July 11, 2019
December 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in acute stress symptoms
The Acute Stress Disorder Scale (Bryant, Moulds et Guthrie, 2000) Scores : 1 to 5, higher scores mean worse outcome.
2 times after exposure to the traumatic event; 48-72 hours (T1), 7 to 9 days (T2)
Change in post-traumatic stress symptoms
The Post-Traumatic Checklist-5 (Ashbaugh, Houle-Johnson, Herbert, El-Hage et Brunet, 2016) Scores : 0 to 4, higher scores mean worse outcome.
Baseline (T0) + 2 times after exposure to the traumatic event; 30 to 32 days (T3), 90 to 95 days (T4)
Change in depressive symptoms
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer \& Williams, 2001) Scores : 0 to 3, higher scores mean worse outcome.
4 times after exposure to the traumatic event; 48-72 hours (T1), 7 to 9 days (T2), 30 to 32 days (T3), 90 to 95 days (T4)
Change in anxiety symptoms
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams \& Löwe, 2006) Scores : 0 to 3, higher scores mean worse outcome
4 times after exposure to the traumatic event; 48-72 hours (T1), 7 to 9 days (T2), 30 to 32 days (T3), 90 to 95 days (T4)
Change in substance abuse : alcohol
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (Saunders, Aasland, Babor, de la Fuente \& Grant, 1993) Scores : 0 to 5, higher scores mean worse outcome
4 times after exposure to the traumatic event; 48-72 hours (T1), 7 to 9 days (T2), 30 to 32 days (T3), 90 to 95 days (T4)
Change in substance abuse : drug
The Drug Abuse Screening Test (Villalobos-Gallegos, Perez-Lopez, Graue-Moreno, Marin-Navarrete \& Mendoza-Hassey, 2015) Scores : Yes or No, higher "Yes" answers mean worse outcome
4 times after exposure to the traumatic event; 48-72 hours (T1), 7 to 9 days (T2), 30 to 32 days (T3), 90 to 95 days (T4)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in heart rate variation
Baseline (T0) + each week until 90 to 95 days after the event
Absenteeism at work
90 to 95 days after the traumatic event (T4)
Study Arms (2)
Psychological first aid
EXPERIMENTALPFA responders are trained to deliver 8 core actions in the aftermath of traumatic event (: contact and engagement, safety and comfort, stabilization, information gathering, practical assistance, connection with social supports, information on coping, and linkage with collaborative services (within the first 24 hours)
Usual organisational intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne phone call by workplace psychologist (within the first 48 hours) and reference to employee aid program
Interventions
PFA responders (peer support workers) are trained to deliver 8 core actions: contact and engagement, safety and comfort, stabilization, information gathering, practical assistance, connection with social supports, information on coping, and linkage with collaborative services
Emergency intervention by workplace psychologist and limited therapeutic sessions with employee aid program
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Actively working at Urgence-Santé organization as paramedics or emergency medical dispatchers
- Exposed to a traumatic event at work (after the baseline)
You may not qualify if:
- \- at high risk of suicidal behaviour
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Urgences-santé
Montreal, Quebec, H1P 0A4, Canada
Related Publications (12)
Bryant RA. Acute stress reactions: can biological responses predict posttraumatic stress disorder? CNS Spectr. 2003 Sep;8(9):668-74. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900008853.
PMID: 15079140BACKGROUNDAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5 (5e éd.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing
BACKGROUNDBrymer, M. Jacobs, A. Layne, C., Pynoos, R., Ruzek, J., Steinberg, A., Vernberg. E. & Watson, P. (2006). Psychological First Aid: Field Operations Guide: 2nd Edition. National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Doi:10.1037/e536202011-001
BACKGROUNDRuzek, J. I., Brymer, M. J., Jacobs, A. K., Layne, C. M., Vernberg, E. M. & Watson, P. J. (2007). Psychological first aid. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29(1), 17-49.
BACKGROUNDGuidelines for the Management of Conditions Specifically Related to Stress. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK159725/
PMID: 24049868BACKGROUNDBryant RA, Moulds ML, Guthrie RM. Acute Stress Disorder Scale: a self-report measure of acute stress disorder. Psychol Assess. 2000 Mar;12(1):61-8.
PMID: 10752364BACKGROUNDAshbaugh AR, Houle-Johnson S, Herbert C, El-Hage W, Brunet A. Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0161645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161645. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27723815BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDSaunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
PMID: 8329970BACKGROUNDVillalobos-Gallegos, L., Perez-Lopez, A., Graue-Moreno, J., Marin-Navarrete, R., & Mendoza-Hassey, R. (2015). Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10. Salud Mental, 38, 2, 89-94.
BACKGROUNDSkevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
PMID: 15085902BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luc De Montigny
Urgences-santé
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephane Guay
Research Center of the Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher and Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2019
First Posted
December 17, 2019
Study Start
October 21, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share