Optimization of Sampling and Processing of Samples for Molecular Microbial Research on Ocular Surface Samples
EPSO
Optimization of Sampling for Molecular Microbial Research on Ocular Surface Samples and Building a Framework for Comparing Current Sequencing Results Using Different Extraction Protocols.
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of anesthetics and the processing of the retrieved samples are major confounding factors that influence the results of microbiome research.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedJuly 22, 2022
June 1, 2022
2.4 years
December 4, 2019
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference in richness of the microbial flora measured as operational taxonomic units
The difference in richness and evenness of distribution of the microbial flora of samples retrieved after a drop of topical anesthesia versus samples retrieved after a drop of artificial tears.
5 minutes per sampling session
Difference in evenness of distribution of the microbial flora measured as operational taxonomic units
The effect of the different microbial DNA extraction protocols on the richness and evenness of distribution of the microbial flora of the ocular surface will be compared.
5 minutes per sampling session
Study Arms (2)
Drop of artificial tears
PLACEBO COMPARATORA drop op Thealoz duo
Drop op anesthetic
ACTIVE COMPARATORA drop of oxybuprocaïne
Interventions
Swab of the conjunctival fornices of both eyes
One drop of topical anesthesia in one eye
One drop of artificial tears in the other eye
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willing to undergo sampling of the conjunctiva
- Fluent in written and verbal Dutch
- Capable of giving informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to oxybuprocaine
- Medication usage in one eye only
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Ophthalmology
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heleen Delbeke, MD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The nurse application the drops receives a closed envelope wherein the information about which eye receives what type of drop is included. The executor is blinded.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2019
First Posted
December 10, 2019
Study Start
August 19, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
July 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share