Comparison of EMR-P With Conventional EMR
Comparison of Precutting vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common cancer in women.There are about 14 million cases of colonoscopy in the United States every year. In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer in China has risen sharply, becoming a serious threat to people's health.For small(≤ 9mm) lesions, endoscopic biopsy forceps and cold snare polypectomy can be used to remove.For larger lesions, especially laterally spreading tumor,endoscopic mucosal resection is a classic method of treatment.With the increasing diameter of the lesion size(\> 20mm),we also need to adopt endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. As IT, Hook knife, BB, and other devices appear constantly, foreign researchers recently adopted a variation of conventional EMR(CEMR), namely endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting(EMR - P).The technology is superior to conventional EMR for 10 to 20 mm polyps.Moreover, preliminary studies suggest that it has good safety and efficacy, and may be a better method for treatment of 10-20mm polyps under colonoscopy. This clinical trial is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of two methods of polypectomy, CEMR and EMR-P, for 10-20mm colorectal polyps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
December 1, 2019
5 months
December 5, 2019
June 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
R0 rate
en bloc resection with a histologically confirmed negative resection margin
7 days
En bloc rate
endoscopically assessed removal of the lesion in one piece
immediately
Study Arms (2)
group P
EXPERIMENTALgroup C
OTHERInterventions
After submucosal injection, we use ESD knife or the tip of the entrapment device to loop around the lesion, and then overlapped the loop tangent with the entrapment device. After tightening the entrapment device, all the tumor tissues were confirmed to enter the entrapment device, and the tissues were removed.
A liquid pad was formed by injecting 0.9% normal saline with meilan solution into submucosa,and then overlapped the loop tangent with the entrapment device. After tightening the entrapment device, all the tumor tissues were confirmed to enter the entrapment device, and the tissues were removed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- One polyp or lesion of 10-20mm at the most proximal of colorectal
- Adult patients (≥18 years old)
- Polyps other than pedicled polyps
You may not qualify if:
- There was submucosal infiltration under endoscope
- Residual lesions after endoscopic resection
- Inflammatory bowel disease, familial polyps, electrolyte abnormalities, coagulation disorders, or severe organ failure
- Pregnant or nursing
- No informed consent has been signed
- Patients taking NSAIDs or other anticoagulants
- sedated colonoscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
Jinhua, Zhejiang, China
The Central Hospital of Lishui City
Lishui, Zhejiang, China
Ningbo First Hospital
Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital
Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province
Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
Renmin Hospital of Yuyao City
Yuyao, Zhejiang, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2019
First Posted
December 9, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-12