Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Large Non Pedunculated Colonic Adenomas: a Randomized Comparative Trial
RESECT COLON
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Initially developed in Japan for the treatment of endemic superficial gastric cancers, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows resection of pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the digestive tract into a single fragment. It allows a perfect pathological analysis, and decreases the rate of recurrence of the adenoma to less than 2% However, this procedure, which is technically more challenging, is also more risky (perforation rate at 4% vs. 1% for WF-EMR) and longer. Submucosal dissection is also more expensive in terms of equipment, but this difference can be offset by the cost of the high number of iterative colonoscopies required in patients who have had endoscopic resection by WF-EMR. Scientific debate is agitating the Western world1,2 and Japanese experts do not perform WF-EMR anymore, whereas no comparative prospective study has compared these two procedures. We therefore propose to compare these two endoscopic resection strategies in terms of recurrence rate at 6 months and to estimate the differential cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios over a 36-month time horizon.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 19, 2025
CompletedJanuary 22, 2026
January 1, 2026
2 years
May 22, 2019
January 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy
Compare between two groups
Month 6
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Proportion of R0 resection rate
Month 1
Cumulative complications rate after treatment
Month 1
Endoscopic curative resection rate without surgery
Month 36
Quality of life over time
Month 36
Cost-effectiveness ratio
Month 36
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)
EXPERIMENTALEndoscopic Mucosal Resection (WF-piece meal EMR)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
ESD is a new endoscopic resection procedure that allows en-bloc resection for large superficial colorectal neoplasms. It used dedicated devices and consists in a deep submucosal dissection under the lesion after surelevation thanks to submucosal fluid injection and mucosal incision all around the lesion. The en bloc resection allows a perfect pathological analysis and a very low risk of recurrence (\<1.5%)
WF-piece meal EMR is an older endoscopic resection technique. After surelevation of the lesion thanks to fluid submucosal injection, the precancerous lesion is resected in several pieces using a polypectomy snare. At the end of the procedure when macroscopically visible adenoma has been totally resected a snare tip coagulation of the margin of the scar is performed to destroy potential non visible residual adenoma. This procedure is quicker, safer than ESD but result in more recurrent disease (from 10 to 30% for lesions larger than 25 mm).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient suffering from non-pedunculated polyp suspected larger than 25 mm in the colon
- Colon localization beyond 15 cm of the anal margin.
- Indication for endoscopic treatment
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years old
- Patients able to fill in questionnaires written in French
You may not qualify if:
- Prior endoscopic resection attempt
- Contra-indication to colonoscopy
- Contra-indication to general anesthesia
- Inability to stop antiplatelet agents and anti-coagulant according to the European Society of Gastro-Intestinal Endoscopy guidelines.
- Recurrent adenoma: post-endoscopic or surgical resection
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Genetic polyposis (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Lynch Syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome)
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Patient under legal protection and or deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Patient already participating in an interventional clinical research protocol
- Patient who cannot be followed for the duration of the study
- Non-pedunculated polyp ≤ 25 mm
- Suspicion of deep submucosal cancer by analysis of macroscopic appearance (Paris 0-III), vascular pattern and pit pattern (SANO IIIB, KUDO Vn)
- Non granular pseudodepressed Laterally spreading tumors due to the high risk of nonvisible submucosal cancer
- Polyp involving the appendice deeply (type 2 or 3 of classification of Toyonaga)
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
University Hospital, Limoges
Limoges, France, 87042, France
Jean Mermoz Hospital
Lyon, France, 69008, France
Edouard Herriot Hospital
Lyon, 69437, France
Nancy University Hospital
Nancy, 54500, France
Cochin Hospital
Paris, 75014, France
Pontchaillou Hospital
Rennes, 35033, France
Related Publications (1)
Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T, Rosch T, Lepilliez V, Chaussade S, Rivory J, Legros R, Chevaux JB, Leblanc S, Rostain F, Barret M, Albouys J, Belle A, Labrunie A, Preux PM, Lepetit H, Dahan M, Ponchon T, Crepin S, Marais L, Magne J, Pioche M. Endoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas : A Randomized Comparative Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):29-38. doi: 10.7326/M23-1812. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
PMID: 38079634DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2019
First Posted
May 24, 2019
Study Start
September 17, 2019
Primary Completion
September 28, 2021
Study Completion
March 19, 2025
Last Updated
January 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share