NCT04190784

Brief Summary

A multitude of stretching parameters are used in the clinical setting. However, there is no convincing evidence to suggest which parameters are most effective in the management of chronic myofascial pain syndrome .In this regard, although the stretching duration is considered one of the most important variables that can affect the treatment outcome, to date there is little agreement on the most effective stretching duration.Accordingly ,we will conduct this study to investigate the effect of different stretching duration on nerve root function ,central conduction time, and chronic myofascial pain management outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
132

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 5, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 14, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 15, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

9 days

First QC Date

December 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialMyofascial Pain SyndromeStretching exercisesnerve root function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The change in peak-to-peak amplitudes of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials for C4,C5,C6,C7,&C8

    Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials will be elicited by repetitive, square wave (0.5 ms) electrical pulses (at 3 Hz) from standard clinical surface gel electrodes (20 mm) overlying cervical sensory dermatomes. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential will be collected at a stimulus intensity well above perception threshold.Complete recording runs will be undertaken during each session with averages of 250 to 1200 cortical responses from scalp surface recording electrodes (C3'-C4' in a 10-20 electrode configuration) of the contralateral scalp to the C4 to C8 dermatomes being stimulated

    will be measured at two intervals ;pre-treatment and immediately after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • The change in central conduction time

    will be measured at two intervals ;pre-treatment and immediately after treatment.

  • The change in Neck Disability Index

    will be measured at two intervals ;pre-treatment and immediately after treatment.

  • The change in Cervical range of motion

    will be measured at two intervals ;pre-treatment and immediately after treatment

  • The change in Neck pain intensity

    will be measured at two intervals ;pre-treatment and immediately after treatment

  • The change in Pressure-pain threshold , algometric measurement

    will be measured at two intervals ;pre-treatment and immediately after treatment.

Study Arms (6)

60 seconds stretching group

EXPERIMENTAL

Stretching exercises for upper Trapezius and Levator scapula . From supine position , the examiner will passively place the participant's head into flexion, side-bending away and rotation towards the side to be stretched (for upper trapezius muscle) and flexion, side-bending away and rotation away from the side to be stretched (for levator scapula ). The patient introduces a light resisted effort to take the stabilized shoulder towards the ear and the ear towards the shoulder. The contraction is sustained for 10 seconds and, upon complete relaxation of effort, the therapist gently eases the head/ neck into an increased degree of side-bending and rotation, where it is stabilized, as the shoulder is stretched caudally. The examiner will depress the participant's shoulder with 100 Newton's of force measured with pressure dynamometer. Once the examiner achieved this level of force, he maintains the stretch for 60 seconds . The procedure is repeated three times.

Other: Stretching exercises

30 seconds stretching group

EXPERIMENTAL

The same procedures while the therapist will maintain the stretch for 30 seconds.

Other: Stretching exercises

15 seconds stretching group

EXPERIMENTAL

The same procedures while the therapist will maintain the stretch for 15 seconds.

Other: Stretching exercises

60 seconds placebo stretching group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The therapist will maintain the same manual contact without stretching force for 60 seconds

Other: Placebo stretching

30 seconds placebo stretching group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The therapist will maintain the same manual contact without stretching force for 30 seconds

Other: Placebo stretching

15 seconds placebo stretching group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The therapist will maintain the same manual contact without stretching force for 15 seconds

Other: Placebo stretching

Interventions

Post-facilitation stretch is a technique involves a maximal contraction of the muscle at mid-range with a rapid movement to maximal length followed by a static stretch.

Also known as: Janda's post facilitation stretch method
15 seconds stretching group30 seconds stretching group60 seconds stretching group

The therapist maintains the same manual contact without stretching force.

15 seconds placebo stretching group30 seconds placebo stretching group60 seconds placebo stretching group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Major criteria:
  • Regional pain complaint in the neck.
  • Pain complaint or altered sensation in the expected distribution of referred pain from a myofascial trigger point.
  • Taut band palpable in an accessible muscle.
  • Excruciating spot tenderness at one point along the length of the taut band.
  • Some degree of restricted range of motion , when measurable.
  • Minor criteria:
  • Reproduction of clinical pain complaint, or altered sensation, by pressure on the tender spot.
  • Elicitation of a local twitch response by transverse snapping palpation at the tender spot or by needle insertion into the tender spot in the taut band.
  • Pain alleviated by elongating (stretching) the muscle or by injecting the tender spot (trigger point).

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be excluded if any signs or symptoms of medical "red flags" were present: tumor, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, and prolonged steroid use. Additionally, subjects will be excluded with previous spine surgery and any exam findings consistent with neurological diseases and vascular disorders.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ibrahim Moustafa

Sharjah city, United Arab Emirate, 27272, United Arab Emirates

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Backes WH, Nijenhuis RJ (2008): Advances in spinal cord MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 29(4):619-31. Biglioli, Paolo; et alia (2004): Upper and lower spinal cord blood supply: the continuity of the anterior spinal artery and the relevance of the lumbar arteries. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 127 (4): 1188-1192. Challis, J.H. (1995): A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. J Biomech 28, 733-737. Cheung, Karoline, Patria A. Hume, and Linda Maxwell. (2003): Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: Treatment Strategies and Performance Factors.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

Interventions

Muscle Stretching Exercises

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Ibrahim M Moustafa, Assoc prof

    University of Sharjah

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The treating therapist, for both the control and intervention groups, was unblinded to the treatment method but the subjects and assessor who conducted the measurements were blinded. Assessor blinding was obtained through an independent research assist; not knowing the study design and not specifically involved in any aspect of the trial
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A prospective, double blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted at one of our university's research departments,
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor-chair of Physiotherapy Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2019

First Posted

December 9, 2019

Study Start

May 5, 2020

Primary Completion

May 14, 2020

Study Completion

May 14, 2020

Last Updated

May 15, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

There is a plan to make individual participant data and related data dictionaries available

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
After 6 months and will become available for one year
Access Criteria
not identified yet

Locations