Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Myofascial Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral erector spina plane block application in myofascial pain syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedMay 15, 2026
May 1, 2026
3.4 years
August 5, 2022
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of the effectiveness of the two interventions (trigger point injection versus Erector spinae plane block) assessed by Visual analog scale (VAS):
The classic interventional treatment of myofascial back pain is trigger point injection. In addition, erector spina plan block has been applied in recent years as an interventional procedure that provides analgesia in the same region and is thought to have a long duration of action. Visual analog scale (VAS): Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Baseline
Comparison of the effectiveness of the two interventions (trigger point injection versus Erector spinae plane block) assessed by Visual analog scale (VAS):
The classic interventional treatment of myofascial back pain is trigger point injection. In addition, erector spina plan block has been applied in recent years as an interventional procedure that provides analgesia in the same region and is thought to have a long duration of action. Visual analog scale (VAS): Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
1. month
Study Arms (2)
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORBilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block
Trigger Point Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORTrapezius muscle Trigger Point Injection
Interventions
Bilateral upper thoracal erector spinae plane block with ultrasound
Trapezius muscle trigger point injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Get a myofascial pain syndrome diagnosis
- No invasive procedure for myofascial pain syndrome in the last 1 month
- Signing the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical disc herniation
- Neck/shoulder, thoracal trauma or operation history
- Malignancy
- Kyphoscoliosis
- Inflammatory diseases (Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis...)
- Congenital vertebral anomalies
- Pregnancy
- Mental, psychogenic disorder
- Hematological diseases that cause bleeding and coagulation disorders
- Use of antiplatelet, anticoagulant and drugs that cause bleeding tendency
- Severe systemic infection such as sepsis and local infection at the intervention site
- Having an allergy to any of the drugs to be used
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
Istanbul, 34104, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Halil Çetingök
Istanbul University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ass. Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2022
First Posted
October 4, 2022
Study Start
July 25, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share