NCT04189341

Brief Summary

Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasily due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and logissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under US guidance. Therefore, modified-TLIP (mTLIP) block was defined as a new approach. It has been reported that mTLIP block may provide effective analgesia management after lumbar spine surgery. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. It has been reported that ESPB provides lumbar analgesia at T10-12, L3. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided mTLIP block and ESPB pain management after multi-level lumbar spinal instrumentation surgery.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 6, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 10, 2020

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 21, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Modified-thoracolumbar interfascial plane blockErector spina plane blockPostoperative analgesia managementLumbar spinal instrumentation surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Opioid consumption

    The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption

    Change from Baseline Postoperative Visual Analogue Score at 48 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analogue scores (VAS)

    Postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours

Study Arms (3)

Group E = ESPB group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group E, ESP block will be performed. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the L3 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 2 ml saline will be enjected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for block in each side (total 40 mL).

Drug: Erector spinae plane block (Group E)

Group T = mTLIP group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group T, mTLIP block will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and iliocostal muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a medial-to-lateral direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL).

Drug: Modified-thoracolumbar interfascial plane block

Group C = Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.

Interventions

Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.

Group E = ESPB group

Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.

Group T = mTLIP group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • history of bleeding diathesis,
  • receiving anticoagulant treatment,
  • known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
  • infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • patients who do not accept the procedure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Selvitopi K, Yayik AM. Ultrasonography-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block: a new approach. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):775-776. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0851-y. Epub 2017 Feb 27. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28243853BACKGROUND
  • Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

    PMID: 30853517BACKGROUND
  • Li C, Jia J, Qin Z, Tang Z. The use of ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block for multi-level lumbar spinal surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2018 May;46:49-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Mar 26. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29414616BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal StenosisIntervertebral disc disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patient, investigators and the pain nurse who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: There are three models for this study. The first group is erector spinae plane block group. The second one is thoracal paravertebral block group. The third one is the no intervention control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2019

First Posted

December 6, 2019

Study Start

January 10, 2020

Primary Completion

December 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 30, 2022

Last Updated

February 21, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The investigator's will not share IPD

Locations