NCT04180098

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effects of ten hours C-mill training on gait adaptability in participants with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). Half of the participants start with five weeks of C-mill training (ten 1-hour sessions). The other participants are placed on a waiting list, which is followed by the same five weeks of C-mill training (ten 1-hour sessions). It is hypothesized that ten hours of context specific C-mill training is effective in improving gait adaptability in participants with pure HSP.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2019

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

hereditary spastic paraplegiaC-millgait adaptabilityrehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The mean changes in time scores of the obstacle subtask of the emory functional ambulation profile

    Patients are asked to negotiate a ten meter obstacle course. The number of seconds it takes to complete the subtask is recorded, and multiplied by a factor corresponding to the level of assistive devices used. A lower time score indicates better obstacle negotiation

    Pre-intervention (week 0) till post-intervention (week 6)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • The mean change in the time score on the ten meter walk test

    Pre-intervention (week 0) till post-intervention (week 6)

  • The mean change of the mini balance evaluation system

    Pre-intervention (week 0) till post-intervention (week 6)

  • Mean changes of activity levels measured as time spent active of passive during 24 hours

    Pre-intervention (week 0) till post-intervention (week 6)

  • The mean changes in scores of the activities specific balance confidence scale

    Pre-intervention (week 0) till post-intervention (week 6)

  • Mean changes in number of falls and near falls

    Pre-intervention (week 0) and after the follow-up period of fifteen weeks (experimental group week 21, control group week 27)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (7)

  • The mean changes in time scores of the obstacle subtask of the emory functional ambulation profile

    Pre C-mill intervention (experimental group week 0, control group week 6), post C-Mill intervention (experimental group week 6, control group week 12) and after the follow-up period of fifteen weeks (experimental group week 21, control group week 27)

  • The mean change in the time score on the ten meter walk test

    Pre C-mill intervention (experimental group week 0, control group week 6), post C-Mill intervention (experimental group week 6, control group week 12) and after the follow-up period of fifteen weeks (experimental group week 21, control group week 27)

  • The mean change of the mini balance evaluation system

    Pre C-mill intervention (experimental group week 0, control group week 6), post C-Mill intervention (experimental group week 6, control group week 12) and after the follow-up period of fifteen weeks (experimental group week 21, control group week 27)

  • +4 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Context specific C-mill training

EXPERIMENTAL

Five week C-mill training on gait adaptability.

Behavioral: C-mill intervention

Usual care

OTHER

Usual care for participants with HSP. May vary per individual.

Behavioral: C-mill interventionOther: No intervention

Interventions

A five week personalised rehabilitation program. Participants train gait adaptability via obstacle negotiation, precision stepping and unexpected accelerations and decelerations. The strategies are trained in a safe environment on the C-mill, a treadmill providing augmented reality via visual and acoustic cues. The treatment is implemented in a five week period via 10 biweekly sessions. Each treatment session lasts 60 minutes. In total, participants will receive C-mill training for a total of ten hours. The training will be carried out by a skilled physiotherapist.

Context specific C-mill trainingUsual care

Participants in the control group are placed on a waiting list.

Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of pure-HSP based on molecular diagnosis or based on inheritance pattern
  • Aged between 18-70 years old
  • Being able to walk barefoot on a level ground for 50 meters without a walking aid (use of orthopaedic devices or made-to-measure footwear is allowed).

You may not qualify if:

  • Other neurological or serious orthopaedic or psychiatric co-morbidity
  • Previous HSP-related surgical interventions of the lower extremities.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radboud universitair medisch centrum

Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Nonnekes J, van Lith B, van de Warrenburg BP, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts ACH. Pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up and management of balance impairments and falls in patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Rehabil Med. 2017 May 16;49(5):369-377. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2227.

    PMID: 28471471BACKGROUND
  • Heeren A, van Ooijen M, Geurts AC, Day BL, Janssen TW, Beek PJ, Roerdink M, Weerdesteyn V. Step by step: a proof of concept study of C-Mill gait adaptability training in the chronic phase after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):616-22. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1180.

    PMID: 23811818BACKGROUND
  • Fonteyn EM, Heeren A, Engels JJ, Boer JJ, van de Warrenburg BP, Weerdesteyn V. Gait adaptability training improves obstacle avoidance and dynamic stability in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Gait Posture. 2014;40(1):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.190. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

    PMID: 24786476BACKGROUND
  • Salinas S, Proukakis C, Crosby A, Warner TT. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinical features and pathogenetic mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7(12):1127-38. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70258-8.

    PMID: 19007737BACKGROUND
  • van de Venis L, van de Warrenburg BPC, Weerdesteyn V, van Lith BJH, Geurts ACH, Nonnekes J. Improving gait adaptability in patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia (Move-HSP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Jan 7;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04932-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spastic Paraplegia, HereditarySpastic paraplegia 3, autosomal dominant

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hereditary Sensory and Motor NeuropathyNervous System MalformationsNervous System DiseasesHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesPolyneuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesGenetic Diseases, Inborn

Study Officials

  • A.C.H. Geurts, Prof. Dr.

    Radboud University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: All participants monitor their physical activity for 1 week, and falls for 15 weeks. After the screening, participants are randomized. Gait and balance capacity will be assessed in the movement lab of Radboudumc. Participants in the intervention group receives 5 weeks of C-mill training, which is immediately followed by an assessment in the movement lab, one-week of activity monitoring and fall monitoring during a 15 week follow-up period. After follow-up they will receive a final assessment in our movement lab. Participants in the control (waiting list) intervention, continue usual care for 5 weeks, followed by an assessment in the movement lab and one-week of activity monitoring. Subsequently, they receive 5 weeks of C-mill training, followed by an assessment in the movement lab, one-week of activity monitoring and fall monitoring in a follow-up period of 15 weeks. After follow-up, they receive a final assessment in the movement lab.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Posted

November 27, 2019

Study Start

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion

April 15, 2022

Study Completion

April 15, 2022

Last Updated

April 29, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations