Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
Comparison of Postoperative Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Patients With Uterine Prolapse.
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedJanuary 5, 2021
December 1, 2020
12 months
November 24, 2019
December 31, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score
a system for assessing the degree of prolapse of pelvic organs
12 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire (PQoL) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse
12 months after intervention
Change from baseline Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse
12 months after intervention
Change from baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain
12 months after intervention
Failure (%)
12 months after intervention
Complications
12 months after intervention
Study Arms (3)
Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy,
Under general anesthesia,laparoscopic approach is used to enter the abdomen.Following this, visceral peritoneum is held with forceps from the point where the sacro-uterine ligaments adhere to the uterus. cut with unipolar scissors to the sacrouterin ligaments approximately 2-4 cm in the midline a transverse incision is made and the posterior wall of the cervix is reached. Approx. 10-15 x2 cm polypropylene mesh 5 mm trocar is inserted into the abdomen with the help of grasper and one end three points with 2/0 non-absorbable prolene sutures in the midline cervix Intracorporeal suture technique. After the sacral promontorium on peritona about 2 The transverse incision is made to the normal anatomical position and the appropriate mesh length is determined and the other end is fixed to the area prepared on the sacral promontorium at 3 points with 2-0 prolene. Bleeding reperitonization according to intracorporeal suture technique with 2/0 vicry
Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension
A 10 cm diameter trocar is passed through a 1 cm infraumbical incision. In addition, two 5 mm diameter trocar are placed on 4 cm on both sides of the spinal iliac crest, and a 5 mm diameter trocar is placed laterally in the rectus muscle at the left lateral level of the umbilicus. A Prolene network of 25 cm in length is prepared. Dissection of the uterine cavity is performed to expose a mustache. The bottom of the web is secured by suturing the web in the midline and sides of the web with 2-0 prolene. The left and right modified lateral ports are then removed by moving under the bottom of the planet with the help of the planet until the isthmus reaches the bottom of the round ligament. The lateral ports are again slid onto the mesh, placed and sutured with peritoneal 2-0 vicryil, the mesh ends are cut at the skin level and the procedure is terminated.
Laparoscopic Pectopexy
First, the peritoneal layer on the top and side of the bladder opens parallel to the round ligament toward the right pelvic sidewall. The iliopectineal ligament is then located under the guidance of the obliterated umbilical artery, lateral to the obliterated umbilical artery and medially of the outer iliac vein. iliopectineal (Cooper) ligament exposing a segment of approximately 3-4 cm is formed. After completion of the dissections, the ends of the mesh are sutured to both iliopectineal ligaments by intracorporeal suture using nonabsorbable sutures. The middle of the net is fixed with three sutures to the lower anterior segment of the uterus. The peritoneum on the mesh is sutured with an absorbable suture material.
Interventions
medical examination
Eligibility Criteria
patients who underwent surgical prolapse uteri operation in our hospital
You may qualify if:
- patients requiring surgical treatment for the symptomatic stage of pelvic organ prolapse ≥ 2
You may not qualify if:
- Age \> 70 years
- Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Diyarbakır Women's and Children's Hospital
Diyarbakır, 21100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson JB, Gayet-Ageron A, Lange S, Eperon I, Dubuisson J. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1685-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3327-2. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
PMID: 28417156BACKGROUNDBojahr B, Tchartchian G, Waldschmidt M, Ohlinger R, De Wilde RL. Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of the subjective outcome in 310 cases. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:538426. doi: 10.1155/2012/538426. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
PMID: 21912552BACKGROUNDNoe KG, Schiermeier S, Alkatout I, Anapolski M. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy-postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study. J Endourol. 2015 Feb;29(2):210-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0413. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PMID: 25350228BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Şerif Aksin
Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2019
First Posted
November 26, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
January 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12