NCT03436147

Brief Summary

Utero-vaginal prolapse is a common, often disabling, condition experienced by women of varying ages. The traditional surgical treatment for utero-vaginal prolapse often includes vaginal hysterectomy and anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. Growing emphasis on patient-centered medicine and patient-generated definitions of surgical success has resulted in reassessment of uterine preservation versus hysterectomy at the time of apical POP repair. Various techniques have been described for uterine preserving prolapse surgery, which may include vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy, transvaginal mesh kits, abdominal sacrohysteropexy using mesh and laparoscopic uterine suspension using sling or mesh. A modified form of uterine-preserving prolapse surgery using a combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach was introduced and a series of 70 women was reported. To date, there have been no randomized studies comparing the outcomes of vaginal assisted laparoscopic uterine suspension (hysteropexy) with conventional vaginal hysterectomy. Women attending the gynecology clinic at a tertiary referral urogynecology unit in tertiary referral training and research hospital requesting surgical treatment for STAGE 2-4 symptomatic uterine prolapse will be offered participation in a randomized trial, over a 2-year period. Subjects participating in the study were randomly assigned to either of two groups: Group A, Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Hysteropexy (VALH), or Group B, Vaginal Hysterectomy and Mc Call Culdoplasty (VH + Mc Call).1 year following surgery, vaginal prolapse will be assessed again using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) questionnaire and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Quantification (POP-Q) examination by another researcher then the operator.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2018

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 3, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 6, 2018

Results QC Date

July 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

vaginal hysterectomylaparoscopic hysteropexypelvic organ prolapse quantification

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

    Number of Participants with Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

    Postoperative first year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • POP-Q SYSTEM Point C MEASUREMENT

    change from preoperative measurement of pop-q point c at postoperative first year

  • ICIQ-VS Vaginal Symptom Subscale

    change from preoperative ICIQ-VS vaginal symptom subscale score at postoperative first year

Study Arms (2)

Vaginal Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy(VALH)

Patients who were performed vaginal assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (VALH)

Other: POP-Q

Vaginal Hysterectomy and Vaginal vault suspension (VAH+VVS)

Patients who were performed vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal vault suspension(VAH+VVS)

Other: POP-Q

Interventions

POP-QOTHER

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

Vaginal Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy(VALH)Vaginal Hysterectomy and Vaginal vault suspension (VAH+VVS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Women attending the gynecology clinic at a tertiary referral urogynecology unit in our hospital requesting surgical treatment for STAGE 2-4 symptomatic uterine prolapse.

You may qualify if:

  • patients who are over 35 years of age with no desire to preserve fertility. (Subjects had completed childbearing or were practicing reliable contraception)
  • have a normal size uterus (\<10 cm) on examination or ultrasound
  • who agree to participate in principle will be given further information about the trial and consent will be obtained either in an outpatient clinic or at the next visit for preoperative assessment.

You may not qualify if:

  • cervical elongation (surgeon discretion),
  • prior mesh prolapse repair,
  • current foreign-body complications,
  • increased risk or recent history of cervical dysplasia, chronic pelvic pain, significant uterine abnormalities, and abnormal menstruation.
  • postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months
  • women with a significantly enlarged fibroid uterus
  • concomitant medical problems precluding general anesthesia or the use of a steep trendelenberg position

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, 34147, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ismail Alay
Organization
bakirkoy dr sadi konuk training and research hospital

Study Officials

  • Cihan Kaya

    Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2018

First Posted

February 19, 2018

Study Start

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion

February 1, 2019

Study Completion

February 1, 2020

Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Results First Posted

September 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations