Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy
1 other identifier
observational
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Utero-vaginal prolapse is a common, often disabling, condition experienced by women of varying ages. The traditional surgical treatment for utero-vaginal prolapse often includes vaginal hysterectomy and anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. Growing emphasis on patient-centered medicine and patient-generated definitions of surgical success has resulted in reassessment of uterine preservation versus hysterectomy at the time of apical POP repair. Various techniques have been described for uterine preserving prolapse surgery, which may include vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy, transvaginal mesh kits, abdominal sacrohysteropexy using mesh and laparoscopic uterine suspension using sling or mesh. A modified form of uterine-preserving prolapse surgery using a combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach was introduced and a series of 70 women was reported. To date, there have been no randomized studies comparing the outcomes of vaginal assisted laparoscopic uterine suspension (hysteropexy) with conventional vaginal hysterectomy. Women attending the gynecology clinic at a tertiary referral urogynecology unit in tertiary referral training and research hospital requesting surgical treatment for STAGE 2-4 symptomatic uterine prolapse will be offered participation in a randomized trial, over a 2-year period. Subjects participating in the study were randomly assigned to either of two groups: Group A, Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Hysteropexy (VALH), or Group B, Vaginal Hysterectomy and Mc Call Culdoplasty (VH + Mc Call).1 year following surgery, vaginal prolapse will be assessed again using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) questionnaire and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Quantification (POP-Q) examination by another researcher then the operator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 3, 2020
CompletedSeptember 25, 2020
September 1, 2020
1 year
February 6, 2018
July 9, 2020
September 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Number of Participants with Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Postoperative first year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
POP-Q SYSTEM Point C MEASUREMENT
change from preoperative measurement of pop-q point c at postoperative first year
ICIQ-VS Vaginal Symptom Subscale
change from preoperative ICIQ-VS vaginal symptom subscale score at postoperative first year
Study Arms (2)
Vaginal Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy(VALH)
Patients who were performed vaginal assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (VALH)
Vaginal Hysterectomy and Vaginal vault suspension (VAH+VVS)
Patients who were performed vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal vault suspension(VAH+VVS)
Interventions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
Eligibility Criteria
Women attending the gynecology clinic at a tertiary referral urogynecology unit in our hospital requesting surgical treatment for STAGE 2-4 symptomatic uterine prolapse.
You may qualify if:
- patients who are over 35 years of age with no desire to preserve fertility. (Subjects had completed childbearing or were practicing reliable contraception)
- have a normal size uterus (\<10 cm) on examination or ultrasound
- who agree to participate in principle will be given further information about the trial and consent will be obtained either in an outpatient clinic or at the next visit for preoperative assessment.
You may not qualify if:
- cervical elongation (surgeon discretion),
- prior mesh prolapse repair,
- current foreign-body complications,
- increased risk or recent history of cervical dysplasia, chronic pelvic pain, significant uterine abnormalities, and abnormal menstruation.
- postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months
- women with a significantly enlarged fibroid uterus
- concomitant medical problems precluding general anesthesia or the use of a steep trendelenberg position
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34147, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ismail Alay
- Organization
- bakirkoy dr sadi konuk training and research hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cihan Kaya
Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2018
First Posted
February 19, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 25, 2020
Results First Posted
September 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09