Sequential Nephron Blockade in Acute Heart Failure
Early Sequential Nephron Blockade Versus Standard Diuretic Treatment in Acute Heart Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
310
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background - Volume overload is an important clinical target in acute heart failure management (AHF), typically addressed using loop diuretics. An important and challenging subset of heart failure patients exhibit fluid overload despite significant doses of loop diuretics. One approach to overcome loop diuretic resistance is the addition of a thiazide-type diuretic to produce diuretic synergy via "sequential nephron blockade". Although potentially able to induce diuresis in patients otherwise resistant to high doses of loop diuretics, this strategy has not been subjected to large-scale clinical trials to establish safety and clinical efficacy. Methods - Our trial is a multicentric, double blind, randomized clinical study, aiming to recruit 310 patients with AHF and clinically evident volume overload. Study participants are randomized to receive a standard diuretic therapy (intravenous loop diuretics as recommended by current guidelines plus placebo) or SNB therapy (loop diuretics plus oral metolazone at the dose of 5/10 mg once daily) on top of standard medical therapy. Mineralocorticoid antagonists will be used in association with the two regimens according to blood potassium level and kidney function at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint is defined as the change in the serum creatinine level and the change in weight, considered both as a bivariate response and with their single components, between the time of randomization and 72 hours after randomization. Secondary endpoints include global well-being and dyspnoea assessed by a visual-analogue scale, changes in body weight and net fluid loss, proportion of patients free from congestion, treatment failure, changes in biomarker levels and the composite of death, rehospitalization, or an emergency room visit within 60 days, as well as the composite of total number of days hospitalized or death during the 60 days after randomization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedNovember 19, 2019
November 1, 2019
1.1 years
October 26, 2019
November 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in the serum creatinine level and the change in weight, considered both as a bivariate response and with their single components
The bivariate response will be displayed on a two-dimensional grid with individual data points for each patient representing paired changes in both creatinine (inmg/dL) and weight (in kilograms) 76 hours after randomization. A confidence region for the average difference between treatment arms in this bivariate response can be described as an ellipse, and the 2 treatment arms will be compared statistically with the use of the Hotelling T- square, which is a multivariate analog of the 2-sample t test used with a single continuous variable (Ann Math Stat. 1931; 2:360-78). Evaluating these 2 important responses to treatment as a bivariate end point reflects clinically important responses to therapy and avoids the requirement of making adjustments in sample size to prevent a type 1 error that would be necessary if the end points were considered separately (Eur J Heart Fail. 2003; 5:717-23).
72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (9)
global well-being assessment by a visual-analogue scale
72 hours
body weight assessment
72 hours
congestion
72 hours
treatment failure
7 days
Biomarkers
72 hours, 7 days or discharge
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORintravenous loop diuretics as recommended by current guidelines plus placebo
SNB
EXPERIMENTALloop diuretics plus oral metolazone at a dose of 5/10 mg once daily
Interventions
Study participants receive loop diuretics plus oral metolazone at a dose of 5/10 mg once daily
Study participants receive a standard diuretic strategy (intravenous loop diuretics as recommended by current guidelines plus placebo)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed
- Male or female patients 18 years of age or older
- An elective or emergency hospital admission with clinical diagnosis of decompensated HF with at least one clinical sign of volume overload (e.g. oedema (score 2 or more), ascites confirmed by echography or pleural effusion confirmed by chest X-ray or echography) Plasma NT-proBNP levels \>1000 ng/mL or BNP levels \>250 ng/mL at the time of screening.
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome defined as typical chest pain in addition to a troponin rise above the 99th percentile and/or electrocardiographic changes suggestive of cardiac ischemia
- History of congenital heart disease requiring surgical correction
- History of a cardiac transplantation and/or ventricular assist device
- Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg at the moment of admission
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<20 mL/min/1.73m² at screening
- Treatment with metolazone during the index hospitalization and prior to randomization
- Exposure to nephrotoxic agents (i.e. contrast dye) anticipated within the next 3 days
- Use of any non-protocol defined diuretic agent with the exception of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.
- Current use of sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors
- Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Policlinico Casilino ASL RMBlead
- Umberto I Hospital, Nocera Inferiorecollaborator
- IRCCS San Raffaelecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Policlinico Casilino
Rome, Lazio, 00169, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gennaro Cice, MD
Policlinico Casilino
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2019
First Posted
November 15, 2019
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11