Closure of the Uterine Artery at Its Origin vs at the Cervix: a Randomized Trial
Closure at the Origin of the Uterine Artery vs. Closure at the Cervico-isthmic Level in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
One of the fundamental surgical steps in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy is the closure of the uterine artery, this vessel provides the greatest blood supply to the uterus. This step can be done in two ways: the surgeon can choose to interrupt the blood flow by closing the uterine artery in its last part, close to the uterus, or the surgeon can develop the anatomical spaces around the uterus into the deep pelvis, closing it to its origin, maintaining a minimally invasive approach in both cases. Scientific research has tried to establish whether one of the two modalities is the best in reducing intraoperative blood loss and possible complications, but currently there is not enough evidence to recommend an approach rather than another. The investigator has therefore decided to evaluate the results at the end of a laparoscopic hysterectomy in a scientifically rigorous manner.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2020
CompletedFebruary 8, 2021
February 1, 2021
9 months
November 6, 2019
February 5, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
estimated blood loss
ml
End of surgical procedure
Study Arms (2)
OUC
ACTIVE COMPARATOROrigin uterine artery closure
IUC
ACTIVE COMPARATORCervical-isthmic uterine artery closure
Interventions
Interruption the uterine blood flow by closing the uterine artery at its cervical-isthmic part or at its origin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- benign disease
- elective laparoscopic hysterectomy
You may not qualify if:
- malignant disease
- emergency laparoscopic hysterectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ospedale degli Infermi
Ponderano, Biella, 13875, Italy
Related Publications (5)
Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
PMID: 26264829RESULTAust T, Reyftmann L, Rosen D, Cario G, Chou D. Anterior approach to laparoscopic uterine artery ligation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):792-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.07.008.
PMID: 22024265RESULTSimpson NA, Nimrod C, De Vermette R, Leblanc C, Fournier J. Sonographic evaluation of intervillous flow in early pregnancy: use of echo-enhancement agents. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Mar;11(3):204-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11030204.x.
PMID: 9589145RESULTUccella S, Cromi A, Casarin J, Bogani G, Serati M, Gisone B, Pinelli C, Fasola M, Ghezzi F. Minilaparoscopic versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri >/= 16 weeks of gestation: surgical outcomes, postoperative quality of life, and cosmesis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 May;25(5):386-91. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0478. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
PMID: 25839384RESULTUccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Sturla D, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing >/=1 kilogram: a series of 71 cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.706. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
PMID: 24012921RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2019
First Posted
November 8, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 31, 2020
Study Completion
August 31, 2020
Last Updated
February 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share